Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsQuelle Surprise! US and UK to File Criminal Charges Against Small Fry for Barclay’s Libor Abuses
from Naked Capitalism:
Quelle Surprise! US and UK to File Criminal Charges Against Small Fry for Barclays Libor Abuses
Now before anyone gets excited about the specter of bankers doing a perp walk, the early word in a Wall Street Journal story on criminal charges being readied against former Barclays bankers says that the prosecutions will target midlevel traders. This exercise thus continues the established pattern of small fry serving as human shields for managers and executives.
As anyone in finance knows, just going after the little guys, while better than nothing, is hardly adequate. Senior executives get paid on the profits (or more accurately, the apparent profits) of the activities in their purview. And as weve also discussed (long form in ECONNED, but also often here on this blog) risk management and other control functions are too often politically weak by design. Even if the staff in those areas are making an honest effort at doing their job, their real function is often to serve as a fig leaf for management (look, we had all the box checking stuff required by the law in place. Its not our fault if some rogue employees were savvy enough to game our systems). And on top of that, the incentives for the staffers in these units is frequently to curry favor with the producers. For instance, risk managers have technical skills but make less money than traders and often the folks who do trading analytics. So they have every reason to try to impress trading managers in the hopes of getting plucked out of risk management rather than riding herd on those producers.
Similarly, at Standard, the order by New York States Benjamin Lawsky revealed that the banks legal department was working aggressively to circumvent money laundering rules rather than enforce them, even when outside counsel told them they needed to clean up their act.
Things have gotten so topsy-turvy that a colleague has joined a major financial firm in a compliance role working for the head of a major product area. His job is to tell his boss what he can and cant do and be firm about it. And based on his experience so far (more than a year) his boss seems to be tough about compliance. Why would a producer type be so concerned? Normally, youd expect a guy like him to be fighting with firm-wide compliance. Apparently this top manager is concerned that if anything bad happened in his unit, hed be thrown under the bus by top management. So while this is something of an improvement on the old status quo (of anything goes if you can blame low level staff), it still shows that top level management arent doing their jobs at these firm, of having serious controls in place, because they know they wont be the ones who suffer much if a scandal arises. ..................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2013/06/quelle-surprise-us-and-uk-to-file-criminal-charges-against-small-fry-for-barclays-libor-abuses.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 463 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post