On the current state of American politics in general:

[Decoy of Fenris]

“Even the humblest Party member is expected to be competent, industrious, and even intelligent within narrow limits, but it is also necessary that he should be a credulous and ignorant fanatic whose prevailing moods are fear, hatred, adulation, and orgiastic triumph. In other words it is necessary that he should have the mentality appropriate to a state of war. It does not matter whether the war is actually happening, and, since no decisive victory is possible, it does not matter whether the war is going well or badly. All that is needed is that a state of war should exist.”
― George Orwell, 1984


This is in regards to no singular issue, just American politics in general. What say you, D.U.?

[graham4anything]

1. 1984 was Reagan/Bush. I am for Hillary/Booker 2016

[NYC_SKP]

2. Hillary is a globalist corporatist (not that that's a BAD thing). Warren/Feingold 2016...

Between NAFTA and Tata and support for Walgreen and the wars, Hillary for me has worn out her welcome.

Bring on Elizabeth Warren and Russ Feingold.

Greyson would be OK, too, but Russ is more seasoned.

And Warren is 110% behind the 99%.

[monmouth3]

3. I'm still trying to get over the suggestion of Booker......Wow..n/t

[blkmusclmachine]

4. Constant war/Constant profits

Carnage be damned