Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPlease Don’t Forsake the Gray Wolf!
Last edited Sun Jun 9, 2013, 10:05 AM - Edit history (1)
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/08/opinion/dont-forsake-the-gray-wolf.html?ref=todayspaper&_r=1&Dont Forsake the Gray Wolf
By JIM DUTCHER, JAMIE DUTCHER and GARRICK DUTCHER
Published: June 7, 2013
KETCHUM, Idaho IT has been celebrated as one of the great victories of the Endangered Species Act of 1973. After several decades of federal protection, gray wolves once nearly wiped out in the continental United States have reached a population of roughly 6,100 across three Great Lakes states and seven Western states.
But this success has been only partial. The centuries-old war against wolves continues to rage, particularly in states where the species has lost federal protection in recent years, as management of wolf populations was turned over to the states.
On Friday, the federal Fish and Wildlife Service put forward a proposal that would make matters even worse. It proposed stripping the remaining federal protections for the gray wolf in the rest of the United States (with the exception of the extremely rare Mexican gray wolf in Arizona and New Mexico). Removing gray wolves from the national endangered species list in the areas where they are still protected would be a mistake. The protections should remain, so that the species can continue its recovery and expand its range, just as the bald eagle and the alligator were allowed to do.
The new proposal, which will be open for a 90-day public comment period, is the latest step in the federal governments effort to turn wolf management entirely over to the states and wash its hands of the animal, which has long been in the cross hairs of powerful hunting and livestock interests.
[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1284 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Please Don’t Forsake the Gray Wolf! (Original Post)
G_j
Jun 2013
OP
In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)1. Save the Gray Wolf!
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,593 posts)2. K&R for a timely and well-written post.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)3. k&r thanks for posting.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)4. Someone should start an online petition. It might help. nm
life long demo
(1,113 posts)5. Thanks for posting the article
Most of us know this is so wrong. But why are they doing it? The wolf hasn't "recovered" yet. There are many petitions up on the web about this decision. thepetitionsite.com, change.org, care2.com, forcedchange.com are a few sites that have petitions for the wolf.
G_j
(40,367 posts)6. Why the Beaver Should Thank the Wolf
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/29/opinion/the-world-needs-wolves.html
Why the Beaver Should Thank the Wolf
By MARY ELLEN HANNIBAL
Published: September 28, 2012
<>
Many Americans, even as they view the extermination of a species as morally anathema, struggle to grasp the tangible effects of the loss of wolves. It turns out that, far from being freeloaders on the top of the food chain, wolves have a powerful effect on the well-being of the ecosystems around them from the survival of trees and riverbank vegetation to, perhaps surprisingly, the health of the populations of their prey.
An example of this can be found in Wyomings Yellowstone National Park, where wolves were virtually wiped out in the 1920s and reintroduced in the 90s. Since the wolves have come back, scientists have noted an unexpected improvement in many of the parks degraded stream areas.
<>
Why the Beaver Should Thank the Wolf
By MARY ELLEN HANNIBAL
Published: September 28, 2012
<>
Many Americans, even as they view the extermination of a species as morally anathema, struggle to grasp the tangible effects of the loss of wolves. It turns out that, far from being freeloaders on the top of the food chain, wolves have a powerful effect on the well-being of the ecosystems around them from the survival of trees and riverbank vegetation to, perhaps surprisingly, the health of the populations of their prey.
An example of this can be found in Wyomings Yellowstone National Park, where wolves were virtually wiped out in the 1920s and reintroduced in the 90s. Since the wolves have come back, scientists have noted an unexpected improvement in many of the parks degraded stream areas.
<>
WyLoochka
(1,629 posts)7. Many people in this state - Wyoming
Would like to take us back a few decades to when there were almost no wolves anywhere. I don't understand the visceral hatred they have for these creatures.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)8. not a wolf fan, but i will kick nonetheless
G_j
(40,367 posts)9. Tell Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell: Put a Stop to this Delisting Catastrophe