Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 06:50 PM Jun 2013

***NSA LEAKERS COMPANY, BOOZ ALLEN, OWNED BY CARLYLE GROUP***

Yeap, no FUDr going on here...why would anyone think that there would be seeing the WAPO story has some gaping holes and that Obama didn't even NEED a warrant to collect the Meta Data!!


Looked at this crap sideways when it came out but no DOUBT I am going to give WAY LESS deference to the leaker knowing how and where he got his info from...I think these guys can spread some light on the issue


http://www.blogtalkradio.com/lesersense/2013/06/09/making-sense-with-steve-leser--nsa-spying-war-on-women


nah, no need to question motives of Carlye Group affliates....

none at all

116 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
***NSA LEAKERS COMPANY, BOOZ ALLEN, OWNED BY CARLYLE GROUP*** (Original Post) uponit7771 Jun 2013 OP
You're right. It's all a conspiracy. neverforget Jun 2013 #1
Yeah, you're right...lets trust the Carlyle Group...those guys have TONS of credibility uponit7771 Jun 2013 #2
So, the Carlyle Group, through Booz Allen employee, Snowden, had him leak information neverforget Jun 2013 #8
Are we supposed to assume that every employee of BA is a Rovian operative? Think about that one. leveymg Jun 2013 #25
Nope, again...just give their accounts the deference they deserve=NONE uponit7771 Jun 2013 #29
So, you think all the docs are fakes because BA is a defense contractor owned by a bigger one? leveymg Jun 2013 #41
They could be treestar Jun 2013 #86
the Bush's thrive on dirty tricks. This is exactly like the fake MiamiDade country recount riot graham4anything Jun 2013 #3
Bushies shock you? Just now? RobertEarl Jun 2013 #10
How is it a dirty trick when Obama is *proud* of the program LondonReign2 Jun 2013 #38
Its a dirty trick because the original story flat out fucking LIED about how the program works. phleshdef Jun 2013 #57
+1 uponit7771 Jun 2013 #74
People shouldn't pass judgment so quick treestar Jun 2013 #85
It has been a scandal a week for a month now BeyondGeography Jun 2013 #4
Scandal after scandal. timdog44 Jun 2013 #96
Feeling a little stressy this afternoon? DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2013 #5
...nah, no need to question the motives of a Bushie Group,...none at all why don't we just uponit7771 Jun 2013 #7
So the spy program has been stopped? Great news. DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2013 #9
After this I hope not, I'll wait for me info now....wasn't supportin it befoee uponit7771 Jun 2013 #11
That's not true. You said exactly the opposite. Need the link again? DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2013 #14
Yes, so everyone can see how you're note accurate about what I said...sure, people can read and dont uponit7771 Jun 2013 #35
Right. We're suppose to just shut up about the Carlyle group.. Cha Jun 2013 #13
Shoot the messenger all you want LondonReign2 Jun 2013 #48
...and if the messenger is a winger affliate we're supposed to take what they say at face value?! uponit7771 Jun 2013 #54
No, PBO didn't make it worse. Cha Jun 2013 #55
WOW!! He ran off to China?! WTF?! You can't right his shit in a book uponit7771 Jun 2013 #65
No shit! Cha Jun 2013 #77
Good info here...this should be it's own TP uponit7771 Jun 2013 #80
Proud of Ted Kennedy's program. Blue State Bandit Jun 2013 #107
Kindly prove that Mr. Snowden's betrayal of his employer Maven Jun 2013 #39
You're right...no need to question agenda of winger group like Carlyles...nah...no need at all uponit7771 Jun 2013 #42
Yes I am right. Until you can prove that his employer is secretly behind this breach Maven Jun 2013 #47
I don't give people who work for those with winger agendas the benefit of the doubt and never have.. uponit7771 Jun 2013 #50
So you can't prove it then Maven Jun 2013 #53
...and for me it doesn't have to be, don't know how clear I can make it. They have a winger... uponit7771 Jun 2013 #59
That is very revealing. zeemike Jun 2013 #97
Carlyle Groups = Left Wing organization?! REALLY?! People are defending the Carlyle GROUP!!??!?!?!? uponit7771 Jun 2013 #98
No, Carlyle group=left wing = false dichotomy. zeemike Jun 2013 #103
Correction, in this case, they were working for Obama's NSA, are Obama and the NSA a GOP front? Dragonfli Jun 2013 #108
... Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #6
since you posted this after I noted this fact RainDog Jun 2013 #12
It DOES instantly prove something...DON'T TRUST THE FUDr!! I also posted supportin FACTS on why I uponit7771 Jun 2013 #16
A Democrat also accepted bribes from a subsidary of the Carlyle Group RainDog Jun 2013 #22
True, that doesn't negate the fact that they nor their minions should be given the benefit of the uponit7771 Jun 2013 #24
You rescinded your dislike again? DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2013 #34
President Obama nominated a Carlyle Group partner to the Federal Reserve Board YoungDemCA Jun 2013 #15
...yeap, and if he started leaking classified "non stories" then I wouldn't trust the stories then.. uponit7771 Jun 2013 #17
You wouldn't trust leaks of classified info from Pres. Obama (because he nominated Jerome Powell)? deurbano Jun 2013 #106
NO FREAKING WAY AnalystInParadise Jun 2013 #18
The Carlyle Groups just a "defense contractor" REALLY?! SERIOUSLY Postin this crap?! uponit7771 Jun 2013 #27
Yeah they are. AnalystInParadise Jun 2013 #30
We disagree, I don't think they're "JUST" another contractor group they have a winger agenda & that uponit7771 Jun 2013 #36
Got it AnalystInParadise Jun 2013 #45
No I don't think this is a "massive conspiracy" and it doesn't have to NOT take what this guy says.. uponit7771 Jun 2013 #64
I just wiped my butt with tp owned by the Koch Brothers... Cooley Hurd Jun 2013 #19
...and if it leaked non story classified info the we'll act accordingly seeing what wipes it... uponit7771 Jun 2013 #28
The jury's still out about this being a "non-story" Cooley Hurd Jun 2013 #33
...not according to 1979 ussc, Obama didn't even NEED warrant for meta data uponit7771 Jun 2013 #58
It has gone from ProSense Jun 2013 #20
+1, ...the "strange" thing might be to smoke out a leaker...seems like they set him up no doubt uponit7771 Jun 2013 #23
What is truly frightening is that BushCo. may have never Vinnie From Indy Jun 2013 #21
I know. ananda Jun 2013 #26
+1, what is reeking more is the acceptance of this companies leeker as non partial uponit7771 Jun 2013 #31
Now that people are waflling and equivocating over privacy losses in a Dem admin Dreamer Tatum Jun 2013 #32
I don't think so, CGroups has a winger agenda so any story from them is fruit of poisnous tree uponit7771 Jun 2013 #40
& when "Carlyle Group" is mentioned, I remind a co-founder (RUBENSTEIN) = Jimmy CARTER's staffer UTUSN Jun 2013 #37
...and that makes their agenda LESS of note? GOP was found by Lincoln, they'd hate the guy now uponit7771 Jun 2013 #43
I have no truck with Carlyle, just shy from buzzwords. & to be clear, here's what I think ofSNOWDEN UTUSN Jun 2013 #51
I do, I don't trust them...they're Bushies and that's enough for me uponit7771 Jun 2013 #72
The way to be EFFECTIVE against our wingnut enemies is to be SMART and not like johnwaynes. n/t UTUSN Jun 2013 #75
Unnn, I don't think one has to be "smart" about not trusting Bushies uponit7771 Jun 2013 #81
My last try: It's about being EFFECTIVE in fighting (the Shrubs, or whoever), not buzzwords or UTUSN Jun 2013 #89
IF people with no such scruples wanted to understand, they'd read that Snowden, elleng Jun 2013 #44
Carlyle Group = winger agenda...screw that, I don't trust them no more than I can throw them with uponit7771 Jun 2013 #46
Snowden is not a corporation, elleng Jun 2013 #56
...of course not, he works for a winger organization and COULD ... COULD be influenced by them seein uponit7771 Jun 2013 #68
IS THAT SO???! Then I applaud him even more Maven Jun 2013 #49
Please outline the "abuses" of this admin on these subjects or do just take what a CG minion says... uponit7771 Jun 2013 #52
In this case AnalystInParadise Jun 2013 #61
I don't hate America's government nor do I have a deep intrenched hateful mistrust of them uponit7771 Jun 2013 #67
This message was self-deleted by its author NightWatcher Jun 2013 #60
That's not ALL their agenda, they're wingers...staunch wingers too. They want to make money and put uponit7771 Jun 2013 #63
This message was self-deleted by its author NightWatcher Jun 2013 #66
...that's not my understanding of them....their ties to the Bushies is notable uponit7771 Jun 2013 #70
Your understanding is incorrect AnalystInParadise Jun 2013 #73
I googled carlyle group and Bush, too many ties for me uponit7771 Jun 2013 #78
Personal Ties and big business AnalystInParadise Jun 2013 #87
This message was self-deleted by its author NightWatcher Jun 2013 #79
...again it wasn't just "connections", it was their winger agenda ALONG with those connections to... uponit7771 Jun 2013 #82
Good god AnalystInParadise Jun 2013 #88
not to some uponit7771 Jun 2013 #90
To Defense contractors it does AnalystInParadise Jun 2013 #92
They want to make money AnalystInParadise Jun 2013 #69
..so will I but I'm partisan to the nth degree, I wont start a lie about a kkkon but damn well I'll uponit7771 Jun 2013 #71
Yes, the timing of the "leak" and the initial hyperbolic "error" are suspect siligut Jun 2013 #62
Executive Order 12333 by Reagan made privatization of intelligence possible. /nt jakeXT Jun 2013 #76
Now that's interesting treestar Jun 2013 #83
That works for Obama's NSA, Why is this Administration so happy to hire them? Dragonfli Jun 2013 #110
This is as stupid as AnalystInParadise Jun 2013 #84
So you're bottom line is they do NOT have a winger agenda?!? REALLY?! tia uponit7771 Jun 2013 #91
No my agenda AnalystInParadise Jun 2013 #93
Good, ...I have a left wing agenda and will work with wingers at any time so that doesn't move my uponit7771 Jun 2013 #95
cause the right wing would never sigmasix Jun 2013 #111
+1, cause the GOP has helped OBama at every step...there's no way I would take anything at face valu uponit7771 Jun 2013 #112
My guess: steve2470 Jun 2013 #94
So he moved to Hong Kong? KrazyinKS Jun 2013 #99
GREAT POINT! "moving" to Hong Kong aint cheep and he'd have to have some long enough money to uponit7771 Jun 2013 #100
EEK! Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #101
This thang got Stank-O-Rama (R) all over it Berlum Jun 2013 #102
Some believe the Carlyle Groups is a bunch of non partisan good fellas uponit7771 Jun 2013 #113
BOMBSHELL: BRADLEY MANNING WORKED FOR THE ARMY!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Enrique Jun 2013 #104
I don't know damnedifIknow Jun 2013 #105
Paul supporter in 2012, another reason I don't take the guy at face value...this whole thing stanks uponit7771 Jun 2013 #109
So why is this supposed to reflect poorly on the leaker? JoeyT Jun 2013 #114
And Ellsberg worked for the Rand Corporation when he leaked the Pentagon Papers to the NY Times . . markpkessinger Jun 2013 #115
k&r avaistheone1 Jun 2013 #116

neverforget

(9,436 posts)
8. So, the Carlyle Group, through Booz Allen employee, Snowden, had him leak information
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 06:57 PM
Jun 2013

about spying after an election to embarrass the President for a program that the President is defending? Wouldn't the Carlyle Group want a Republican in charge of the Executive Branch to get all those lucrative intelligence contracts?

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
25. Are we supposed to assume that every employee of BA is a Rovian operative? Think about that one.
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:09 PM
Jun 2013

Shheeet, even I applied for a job there a while back.

Come back and tell us about it when you have more than THAT.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
41. So, you think all the docs are fakes because BA is a defense contractor owned by a bigger one?
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:19 PM
Jun 2013

How else could a private sector whistleblower obtain such documents unless he worked for a defense contractor?

The line of argument you're spinning is totally illogical.

If the docs were fake, don't you think BA, the NSA, the White House, and everyone else with an interest in this would be pointing that out? Or is Obama part of the conspiracy as well?

Cheez-itz, man. Think before you make such claims.

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
3. the Bush's thrive on dirty tricks. This is exactly like the fake MiamiDade country recount riot
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 06:54 PM
Jun 2013

and the other smears like the way they took down Dan Rather who had true info

with Jeb/Rand wanting to be the next ticket, I'm shocked, shocked that the Bush's friends would resort to dirty tricks now

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
10. Bushies shock you? Just now?
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 06:57 PM
Jun 2013

They are nothing but dirty tricks.

Good to see you leaned something, finally.

timdog44

(1,388 posts)
96. Scandal after scandal.
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 08:18 PM
Jun 2013

When do we sit up and take note that all these are the product of an orchestrated repuke operation. I know that sounds like a conspiracy, but the facts are beginning to speak for them selves. Keep things like this in the news and nothing will ever get done. It is absolutely manufactured. The administration needs to be more forceful. And then needs to be believed, especially by the likes of us on Democratic Underground. We have to keep the, and here I go again, faith.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
5. Feeling a little stressy this afternoon?
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 06:55 PM
Jun 2013

Is Rand Paul running this whole operation from low earth orbit? Oh and, kindly direct me to the link showing that the President has stopped spying on hundreds of millions of Americans.

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
7. ...nah, no need to question the motives of a Bushie Group,...none at all why don't we just
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 06:56 PM
Jun 2013

...beleive their motives they've been so pure in the past no?

tia

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
35. Yes, so everyone can see how you're note accurate about what I said...sure, people can read and dont
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:14 PM
Jun 2013

...leave out jot or tittle

regards

LondonReign2

(5,213 posts)
48. Shoot the messenger all you want
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:27 PM
Jun 2013

Obama is proud of the program and has defended it. He took an awful Bush program and made it worse, and he's defending it.

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
54. ...and if the messenger is a winger affliate we're supposed to take what they say at face value?!
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:30 PM
Jun 2013

REALLY!?

Cha

(296,679 posts)
55. No, PBO didn't make it worse.
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:31 PM
Jun 2013

And, just because FACTS are brought to light that doesn't mean anyone is "shooting" the guy who ran off to China.

Cha

(296,679 posts)
77. No shit!
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:49 PM
Jun 2013

Michael Hargrove @MichaelHargrov1

Smells strange, worked for BAH less that 3 months, gathers classified info, passes to Guardian and Greenwald, flee to HK, living it up.

Bob Cesca @bobcesca_go

A Ron Paul supporter and privacy supporter working for the NSA is like a vegan PETA supporter working for McDonald's. I don't get this guy.

http://theobamadiary.com/2013/06/09/after-newtown-shooting-mourning-parents-enter-into-the-lonely-quiet/#comments

Blue State Bandit

(2,122 posts)
107. Proud of Ted Kennedy's program.
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 09:59 PM
Jun 2013

Let's be clear here. FISA was written by Ted Kennedy, and signed by Jimmy Carter.

Maven

(10,533 posts)
39. Kindly prove that Mr. Snowden's betrayal of his employer
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:18 PM
Jun 2013

(a corporation hired by the government to run this shameful invasion of its citizens' privacy) with the actual approval of said employer, in a secret plot to discredit Obama using Snowden as their "operative".

Otherwise your deliberate and desperate attempt to misdirect has been duly noted.

Thanks

Maven

(10,533 posts)
47. Yes I am right. Until you can prove that his employer is secretly behind this breach
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:23 PM
Jun 2013

of their own policy, then you're just talking out of your ass.

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
50. I don't give people who work for those with winger agendas the benefit of the doubt and never have..
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:28 PM
Jun 2013

...I could care less if the winger organization was DIRECTLY involved or not.

Work for GOP, get no trust from me!!!

Maven

(10,533 posts)
53. So you can't prove it then
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:29 PM
Jun 2013

Therefore the implausible scenario you're trying to sell as fact is completely based on a fabrication by you.

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
59. ...and for me it doesn't have to be, don't know how clear I can make it. They have a winger...
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:32 PM
Jun 2013

...agenda and that rules IN their bias IMHO

...why shouldn't it?

regards

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
97. That is very revealing.
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 08:26 PM
Jun 2013

McCarthyism is based on that exact same thinking.

If you went to a meeting of a group that McCarthy said had a communist agenda then you were one....and McCarthy knew a communist agenda when he saw one.

And I should not have to tell you why it shouldn't

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
98. Carlyle Groups = Left Wing organization?! REALLY?! People are defending the Carlyle GROUP!!??!?!?!?
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 08:28 PM
Jun 2013

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
103. No, Carlyle group=left wing = false dichotomy.
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 08:39 PM
Jun 2013

I no longer accept false dichotomy as a valid argument.

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
12. since you posted this after I noted this fact
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 06:59 PM
Jun 2013

allow me to share, here, what I shared with you on the other thread related to the idea that this instantly proves anything...

we don't know enough about what's going on to know what's happened.

that's how I see it, anyway.

But, yes, this group does defense contracting.

That would include NSA sorts of work, I would imagine, since it's a company that specializes in computer applications.

I think it's probably one of the intel agency's fronts.

I don't know what that has to say about Snowden and I think you're making a mistake to act like this is the money shot in a political porn vid.. tho, who knows, maybe that will turn out to be the case.

or maybe Snowden is Deep Throat.

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
16. It DOES instantly prove something...DON'T TRUST THE FUDr!! I also posted supportin FACTS on why I
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:02 PM
Jun 2013

...now recende my dislike of the program for now.

Screw that, I don't trust ANY..>ANY winger group....they're stupid and vapid

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
22. A Democrat also accepted bribes from a subsidary of the Carlyle Group
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:07 PM
Jun 2013

so, you know, this goes both ways in the parties, regarding contractors and bribes and dirty dealings.

Check out Kwame Kilpatrick. Maybe that was all a giant conspiracy theory and someone coerced Kilpatrick to spend over three-fourths of a million dollars over his mayoral salary...

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
24. True, that doesn't negate the fact that they nor their minions should be given the benefit of the
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:09 PM
Jun 2013

...doubt.

They shouldn't and ESPECIALLY them

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
34. You rescinded your dislike again?
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:14 PM
Jun 2013

2 days ago, you were in favor of spying.
Yesterday, you weren't.
Today, you've changed again.

Bear in mind, I have the links if ou really want to see 'em again. But you might want to spend the time retooling instead.

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
17. ...yeap, and if he started leaking classified "non stories" then I wouldn't trust the stories then..
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:02 PM
Jun 2013

...either

deurbano

(2,894 posts)
106. You wouldn't trust leaks of classified info from Pres. Obama (because he nominated Jerome Powell)?
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 09:44 PM
Jun 2013

Or you wouldn't trust leaks of classified info from Powell?

 

AnalystInParadise

(1,832 posts)
18. NO FREAKING WAY
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:02 PM
Jun 2013

Defense company owned by another Defense Company had a Defense Contract with the government? ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME....THAT"S FUCKING UNPOSSIBLE....SOMEONE CALL THE NEW YORK TIMES, WE MIGHT HAVE A FUCKING STORY HERE.

WOW the stupid burns on this........

 

AnalystInParadise

(1,832 posts)
30. Yeah they are.
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:13 PM
Jun 2013

Of course they have an agenda, but who on this planet does not have an agenda that is involved with Big Business.

They are in defense, do you deny that is one of their investments?

And thank you for noting......I noted your notation.

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
36. We disagree, I don't think they're "JUST" another contractor group they have a winger agenda & that
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:15 PM
Jun 2013

...is enough for me to scream loud and wide about this guy

 

AnalystInParadise

(1,832 posts)
45. Got it
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:22 PM
Jun 2013

you believe this is some massive conspiracy to taint President Obama and his administration even though it could cost Carlyle billions of dollars in revenue.....Or more likely nothing at all like that is happening and your are more paranoid than our government right now.

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
64. No I don't think this is a "massive conspiracy" and it doesn't have to NOT take what this guy says..
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:35 PM
Jun 2013

...at face value

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
28. ...and if it leaked non story classified info the we'll act accordingly seeing what wipes it...
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:11 PM
Jun 2013

...I think that's fair no?

tia

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
20. It has gone from
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:05 PM
Jun 2013

the leak of classified information related to a program, legally conduct and that everyone has known about, to cheering the leaker.

All the facts are still unknown, and those that are coming out are being dismissed.

Fact: The program was legally conducted.

It's a little strange that someone leaks information on something that was done according to law.

Vinnie From Indy

(10,820 posts)
21. What is truly frightening is that BushCo. may have never
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:05 PM
Jun 2013

given up the ability to use these awesome powers when they left office. For all we know, the reason Diane Feinstein and Saxby Chambliss are such ardent defenders of the spying is because they have been compromised using these tools and now do BushCo.'s bidding or face personal destruction. Far out, but certainly possible.

Dreamer Tatum

(10,926 posts)
32. Now that people are waflling and equivocating over privacy losses in a Dem admin
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:13 PM
Jun 2013

I don't think anyone has a right to howl over who owns what corporation.

When your own government captures more information than the corporations you fear, maybe you need to re prioritize your fears.


"The government is watching me? Meh. Monsanto has a way to grow soy in an armpit? ZOMG!!!!!!!! THE HUMANITYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!"


uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
40. I don't think so, CGroups has a winger agenda so any story from them is fruit of poisnous tree
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:18 PM
Jun 2013

...and not to be trusted.

I'll wait for more info now

UTUSN

(70,635 posts)
37. & when "Carlyle Group" is mentioned, I remind a co-founder (RUBENSTEIN) = Jimmy CARTER's staffer
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:17 PM
Jun 2013

Yaas, CARTER had a nest of vipers at his breast: Tweety and Pat CADDELL. However, RUBENSTEIN is a great philanthropist, bought/donated a copy of the Magna Carta, and fired Shrub when Shrub got a trophy job with Carlyle, when Shrub contributed nothing to the board meetings beyond hangovers and dirty jokes.

UTUSN

(70,635 posts)
51. I have no truck with Carlyle, just shy from buzzwords. & to be clear, here's what I think ofSNOWDEN
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:29 PM
Jun 2013

(from another thread: )

*************QUOTE*************

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022979420
[font size=5]PRISM was an effective program and a good balance with civil liberties. Snowden should go to jail.[/font]

*************UNQUOTE*************

UTUSN

(70,635 posts)
89. My last try: It's about being EFFECTIVE in fighting (the Shrubs, or whoever), not buzzwords or
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 08:00 PM
Jun 2013

conspiracy theorizing.

I was going to check out here, but on second thought, am I understanding that your position is: 1) SNOWDEN worked for a CG entity; 2) SNOWDEN disrupted CG; therefore, 3) SNOWDEN is on the side of the angels?

I thought we were on the same page, but to repeat, the other DUer said it for me:

(from another thread: )

*************QUOTE*************

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022979420
[font size=5]PRISM was an effective program and a good balance with civil liberties. Snowden should go to jail.[/font]

*************UNQUOTE*************

elleng

(130,646 posts)
44. IF people with no such scruples wanted to understand, they'd read that Snowden,
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:20 PM
Jun 2013

'a 29-year-old former technical assistant for the CIA and current employee of the defence contractor Booz Allen Hamilton. Snowden has been working at the National Security Agency for the last four years as an employee of various outside contractors, including Booz Allen and Dell. . .

In a note accompanying the first set of documents he provided, he wrote: "I understand that I will be made to suffer for my actions," but "I will be satisfied if the federation of secret law, unequal pardon and irresistible executive powers that rule the world that I love are revealed even for an instant."

Despite his determination to be publicly unveiled, he repeatedly insisted that he wants to avoid the media spotlight. "I don't want public attention because I don't want the story to be about me. I want it to be about what the US government is doing."'

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/09/edward-snowden-nsa-whistleblower-surveillance


uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
46. Carlyle Group = winger agenda...screw that, I don't trust them no more than I can throw them with
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:22 PM
Jun 2013

... a broke arm.

elleng

(130,646 posts)
56. Snowden is not a corporation,
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:31 PM
Jun 2013

he, like others we may have heard from, and like many of us in fact, is one small worker-bee, 'lucky' enough to have seen information which, when made public, might help Americans understand how decisions are/were made in the government. We might want to change the way decisions were made, as a consequence of learning these things.

It is ABSURD to attribute 'Carlyle' motives to such a person as Snowden.

I worked for the Federal Government during reagan's tenure, as well as Jimmy Carter's and Bush1 and 2, and Bill Clinton. Wanna pick and choose whose agenda I 'chose' to exercise?

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
68. ...of course not, he works for a winger organization and COULD ... COULD be influenced by them seein
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:38 PM
Jun 2013

...they're extremist wingers.

The "could" is good enough for me to take what he says with a block of salt

Maven

(10,533 posts)
49. IS THAT SO???! Then I applaud him even more
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:27 PM
Jun 2013

He gets to fuck over the Carlyle Group (just what is the administration doing paying them $$$ anyway?) AND expose the abuses of privacy by this administration in one shot!

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
52. Please outline the "abuses" of this admin on these subjects or do just take what a CG minion says...
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:29 PM
Jun 2013

...at face value?

tia

 

AnalystInParadise

(1,832 posts)
61. In this case
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:33 PM
Jun 2013

I take the words of a 29 year old Defense Contractor over the spin issuing from Washington right now. He hasn't lied to me yet, my government has lied to me several times this week.

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
67. I don't hate America's government nor do I have a deep intrenched hateful mistrust of them
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:37 PM
Jun 2013

...either.

I think Americas govern, though not anywhere near perfect, is pretty dog on good for the most part

Response to uponit7771 (Original post)

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
63. That's not ALL their agenda, they're wingers...staunch wingers too. They want to make money and put
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:33 PM
Jun 2013

...wingers into office = not taking what their minions says about a dem at face value.

They say the sky is blue I go outside and check

Response to uponit7771 (Reply #63)

 

AnalystInParadise

(1,832 posts)
73. Your understanding is incorrect
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:48 PM
Jun 2013

They will work with any President to continue making money. That is how defense contractors work.....CG would work with Roseanne Barr if she was President to keep their contracts going. It is literally that simple.

 

AnalystInParadise

(1,832 posts)
87. Personal Ties and big business
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:55 PM
Jun 2013

neither shall the two meet..carlyle would sell the Bush family down the river if it meant huge profits....the fact that you are not even acknowledging this is stupefying.......

Response to uponit7771 (Reply #70)

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
82. ...again it wasn't just "connections", it was their winger agenda ALONG with those connections to...
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:52 PM
Jun 2013

...wingers ...

That's the reason not to trust them, they DO have a winger agenda

 

AnalystInParadise

(1,832 posts)
92. To Defense contractors it does
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 08:04 PM
Jun 2013

Did you know that in each year of President Obama's Presidency that Booz Allen Hamilton's revenue has gone up, and next year is set to be their biggest ever....and yet CG is going to sacrifice over 6 billion a year to get in a dig at this President.....Again are you for freaking real?

 

AnalystInParadise

(1,832 posts)
69. They want to make money
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:38 PM
Jun 2013

and will work with a Republican, a Democrat or a Martian to make more money. You know very little about Defense companies. They want to make money, not bring anyone down, it is very bad for business when one of their top intelligence companies is going to be punished for this. CG could lose billions.....and yet you think they would do that to get at President Obama.....pass that shit you are smoking over here I need a hit of that stuff.....

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
71. ..so will I but I'm partisan to the nth degree, I wont start a lie about a kkkon but damn well I'll
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:40 PM
Jun 2013

...start the truth and I don't see that's what Greenwald et al did in this case

siligut

(12,272 posts)
62. Yes, the timing of the "leak" and the initial hyperbolic "error" are suspect
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:33 PM
Jun 2013

Just a little disconcerting that some people cannot connect the dots and see the big picture.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
83. Now that's interesting
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:52 PM
Jun 2013

A corporate BFEE entity that would normally be condemned on DU. And anyone for working for it.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
110. That works for Obama's NSA, Why is this Administration so happy to hire them?
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 10:27 PM
Jun 2013

Is this admin a secret BFEE front group? I think you may be onto something!!

 

AnalystInParadise

(1,832 posts)
84. This is as stupid as
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 07:54 PM
Jun 2013

the thread about Snowden giving money to Ron Paul. The Caryle Group sold weapons and defense services when President Clinton was in office, they did so when Bush was in office and they are doing so while President Obama is in office. They will continue to do so as long as they are given contracts because that is what they do, make billions of dollars in defense sales. They have no agenda beyond making money. I won't deny they have right wing leadership, because it is true, but they will not sacrifice such a large cash cow like Booz allen to go after a sitting President. That's fucking stupid, they want to make money no matter who is in office and will work to keep their contracts with anyone who is elected as President and any Congress no matter which party controls it.

Booz allen made almost 6 billion dollars in 2012.......yeah they (CG)are going to endanger that cash cow to take a swipe at President Obama...... Are you for real?

 

AnalystInParadise

(1,832 posts)
93. No my agenda
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 08:08 PM
Jun 2013

is that we have proof that CG worked with Clinton, Bush and now President Obama and have increased their sales in the last four years of defense related items and services. And since we have proof of that, it stands as wildly paranoid to suggest that CG would cut their own throats for no gain. Further my agenda is you have offered nothing beyond "they haz a wingerz agendaz"* even though their sales figures show they don't care who is in charge.

*Z's added to demonstrate the monotonous nature of your repetitive yet unfounded opinion

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
95. Good, ...I have a left wing agenda and will work with wingers at any time so that doesn't move my
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 08:14 PM
Jun 2013

...opinion at all.

I just some winger groups have a REALLY hard agenda and Carlyle Group fits in that category regardless of who they work for.

I don't put it past wingers to be this grimy

sigmasix

(794 posts)
111. cause the right wing would never
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 10:30 PM
Jun 2013

The extreme right wing would never spend billions(small pocket change) to attack this president and be assured of future trillions after the extreme right wing has finished destroying our country from the inside.
The right has already shown it's hatred for America and the liberties we enjoy- why would anyone need to be reminded of this fact?

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
112. +1, cause the GOP has helped OBama at every step...there's no way I would take anything at face valu
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 11:26 PM
Jun 2013

...come from anyone affliated with the GOP

steve2470

(37,457 posts)
94. My guess:
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 08:11 PM
Jun 2013

Note I said guess , because it's too early to know all the facts.

The guy supposedly doesn't even have a high school degree. He's great with computers. He was patriotic and maybe still is.

He eventually got up to (supposedly) $200,000 a year doing something "for his country". Remember this guy doesn't even have a HS degree. Key fact.

He got sicker and sicker of what he saw, despite the money and the patriotic appeal.

He eventually cracked and maybe deep down inside he wants to be a hero/famous/infamous.

Time will tell. If I'm wrong, I'll be happy to say so.

KrazyinKS

(291 posts)
99. So he moved to Hong Kong?
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 08:29 PM
Jun 2013

The whistleblower guy, they said on the news tonight he had to move to Hong Kong permanently. That he can't come back. So...isn't that like... expensive? Where did that money come from? I personally think that is a good question. Makes me wonder, hmmmm.

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
100. GREAT POINT! "moving" to Hong Kong aint cheep and he'd have to have some long enough money to
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 08:30 PM
Jun 2013

...live for a sec without a job..

Good point

damnedifIknow

(3,183 posts)
105. I don't know
Sun Jun 9, 2013, 09:34 PM
Jun 2013

" Snowden voted for a third party in 2008, he told the Guardian, but believed in Obama to put an end to some of the surveillance practices. Instead, after a review, Obama continued the program according to administration officials, adding in additional layers of review to prevent abuse. He told the Guardian he “got hardened” after he “watched as Obama advanced the very policies that I thought would be reined in.”

http://swampland.time.com/2013/06/09/four-things-to-know-about-surveillance-leaker-edward-snowden/

JoeyT

(6,785 posts)
114. So why is this supposed to reflect poorly on the leaker?
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 02:33 AM
Jun 2013

If anything it should reflect poorly on the dumbasses that contracted the Carlyle Group.

The conspiracy theories have actually passed 9/11 CT level and are rapidly approaching Moon Landing Denial level of nutty.

markpkessinger

(8,392 posts)
115. And Ellsberg worked for the Rand Corporation when he leaked the Pentagon Papers to the NY Times . .
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 02:44 AM
Jun 2013

. . . So what? The nature of whistleblowing is such that whistleblowers typically are folks who have worked in the "inside."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»***NSA LEAKERS COMPANY, B...