Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tex-wyo-dem

(3,190 posts)
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 05:36 PM Jun 2013

Wired article from 03-2012: James Bamford: Inside the Matix (NSA Data Centers)

The NSA Is Building the Country’s Biggest Spy Center (Watch What You Say)

BY JAMES BAMFORD03.15.127:24 PM



...

Under construction by contractors with top-secret clearances, the blandly named Utah Data Center is being built for the National Security Agency. A project of immense secrecy, it is the final piece in a complex puzzle assembled over the past decade. Its purpose: to intercept, decipher, analyze, and store vast swaths of the world’s communications as they zap down from satellites and zip through the underground and undersea cables of international, foreign, and domestic networks. The heavily fortified $2 billion center should be up and running in September 2013. Flowing through its servers and routers and stored in near-bottomless databases will be all forms of communication, including the complete contents of private emails, cell phone calls, and Google searches, as well as all sorts of personal data trails—parking receipts, travel itineraries, bookstore purchases, and other digital “pocket litter.” It is, in some measure, the realization of the “total information awareness” program created during the first term of the Bush administration—an effort that was killed by Congress in 2003 after it caused an outcry over its potential for invading Americans’ privacy.

But “this is more than just a data center,” says one senior intelligence official who until recently was involved with the program. The mammoth Bluffdale center will have another important and far more secret role that until now has gone unrevealed. It is also critical, he says, for breaking codes. And code-breaking is crucial, because much of the data that the center will handle—financial information, stock transactions, business deals, foreign military and diplomatic secrets, legal documents, confidential personal communications—will be heavily encrypted. According to another top official also involved with the program, the NSA made an enormous breakthrough several years ago in its ability to cryptanalyze, or break, unfathomably complex encryption systems employed by not only governments around the world but also many average computer users in the US. The upshot, according to this official: “Everybody’s a target; everybody with communication is a target.”

For the NSA, overflowing with tens of billions of dollars in post-9/11 budget awards, the cryptanalysis breakthrough came at a time of explosive growth, in size as well as in power. Established as an arm of the Department of Defense following Pearl Harbor, with the primary purpose of preventing another surprise assault, the NSA suffered a series of humiliations in the post-Cold War years. Caught offguard by an escalating series of terrorist attacks—the first World Trade Center bombing, the blowing up of US embassies in East Africa, the attack on the USS Cole in Yemen, and finally the devastation of 9/11—some began questioning the agency’s very reason for being. In response, the NSA has quietly been reborn. And while there is little indication that its actual effectiveness has improved—after all, despite numerous pieces of evidence and intelligence-gathering opportunities, it missed the near-disastrous attempted attacks by the underwear bomber on a flight to Detroit in 2009 and by the car bomber in Times Square in 2010—there is no doubt that it has transformed itself into the largest, most covert, and potentially most intrusive intelligence agency ever created.

In the process—and for the first time since Watergate and the other scandals of the Nixon administration—the NSA has turned its surveillance apparatus on the US and its citizens. It has established listening posts throughout the nation to collect and sift through billions of email messages and phone calls, whether they originate within the country or overseas. It has created a supercomputer of almost unimaginable speed to look for patterns and unscramble codes. Finally, the agency has begun building a place to store all the trillions of words and thoughts and whispers captured in its electronic net. And, of course, it’s all being done in secret. To those on the inside, the old adage that NSA stands for Never Say Anything applies more than ever.

<much more: http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/03/ff_nsadatacenter/ >

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wired article from 03-2012: James Bamford: Inside the Matix (NSA Data Centers) (Original Post) tex-wyo-dem Jun 2013 OP
Recommended. H2O Man Jun 2013 #1
Thanks, H2O Man... tex-wyo-dem Jun 2013 #2
Shameless self kick n/t tex-wyo-dem Jun 2013 #3
Just the phrase 'Total Information Awareness" creeps me out nt octoberlib Jun 2013 #4
Doesn't matter. Americans are okay with being treated as suspects. magellan Jun 2013 #5
With all that computing power and storage, why don't they just offer Internet service? IDemo Jun 2013 #6

tex-wyo-dem

(3,190 posts)
2. Thanks, H2O Man...
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 05:44 PM
Jun 2013

I thought for sure I had read an article by Bamford very relevant to the discussions going on now. Did a Google search and, voila!

Of course, now my Google search has been logged in to some NSA data center somewhere...as well as this post.

magellan

(13,257 posts)
5. Doesn't matter. Americans are okay with being treated as suspects.
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 10:57 PM
Jun 2013

They don't mind having their private emails and phone calls collected by a massive intelligence apparatus that's in the hands of corporations with zero oversight. (Oh, pardon me -- they need a warrant to actually look and are duty bound to self-report if they accidentally pull the wrong records.) Even better if the guy they voted for is in charge. As long as they're being kept safe from the terrorists, and they don't do or say anything wrong, they trust it's fine.

IDemo

(16,926 posts)
6. With all that computing power and storage, why don't they just offer Internet service?
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 11:05 PM
Jun 2013

NSA Online: Our cloud can't be topped. Trust us.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wired article from 03-201...