Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Found on Facebook; Posted without comment... (Original Post) CaliforniaPeggy Jun 2013 OP
nice artwork. Whisp Jun 2013 #1
The recent NSA stories have nothing to do with wiretapping Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #2
Yeah, officials say they don't eavesdrop. Lionel Mandrake Jun 2013 #4
Yes...they need to get a warrant. That's the key. Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #5
There is a warrant for this data mining, tavalon Jun 2013 #6
I don't like it at all..... a kennedy Jun 2013 #3
agree... AsahinaKimi Jun 2013 #7
disagree... Lionel Mandrake Jun 2013 #8
See #2 AsahinaKimi Jun 2013 #9
See #3 Lionel Mandrake Jun 2013 #10
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
2. The recent NSA stories have nothing to do with wiretapping
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 09:15 PM
Jun 2013

So a picture of Obama wearing headphones doesn't make much sense in the context of the recent NSA stories.

Lionel Mandrake

(4,076 posts)
4. Yeah, officials say they don't eavesdrop.
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 10:20 PM
Jun 2013
The data collected include the phone numbers involved, the time, date and duration of calls and the route a call takes through telephone networks. Officials emphasized that the effort did not include listening to conversations. The National Security Agency stores the data and can use it to detect patterns of calls that might provide intelligence about terrorist activity, officials said.

In addition, if investigators have "reasonable, articulable suspicion" that a phone number is part of a terrorist network, the government can seek a court warrant to search the database for calls connected to that number, according to several senators who have been briefed on the highly classified program.

Read more:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-secret-surveillance-20130607%2C0%2C5263648.story

But what happens after they get that court warrant? Maybe not the NSA, but some agency certainly would listen in if they have reasonable grounds to suspect that a terrorist plot is unfolding. So the headphones might make sense after all.
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
5. Yes...they need to get a warrant. That's the key.
Mon Jun 10, 2013, 10:25 PM
Jun 2013

Law enforcement and US government agencies have been wiretapping people for decades, but they need to have a warrant for it to be considered legal. The judge who signs off on the warrant needs to determine there's probable cause.

tavalon

(27,985 posts)
6. There is a warrant for this data mining,
Tue Jun 11, 2013, 08:13 PM
Jun 2013

so we must all be under suspicion. Or they have probable cause to believe we should be under suspicion.

Lionel Mandrake

(4,076 posts)
10. See #3
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 04:34 PM
Jun 2013

Yep. We'll have to agree to disagree.

I thought the cartoon in the OP was visually clever
It doesn't bear too much analysis.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Found on Facebook; Posted...