Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHey, look, there are laws about when the government can snoop metadata. Let's see what they are
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-II/chapter-206http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-36/subchapter-III
The SCOTUS case Smith v. Maryland said that users of a phone do not have a Constitutional expectation of privacy about the numbers they call and receive calls from, because those numbers have been given to a third party to route them. So the privacy we have in that data is statutory.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_v._Maryland
Just to make it clear: according to SCOTUS for over 30 years now, you do not have a Constitutional expectation of privacy in a number you dial.
The ECPA was an attempt to regulate the snooping of these metadata by law enforcement.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Communications_Privacy_Act
The ECPA required law enforcement to get a court order to use an electronic device that captured the numbers dialed to and from a trunk or phone.
Just to make it clear: by statute since 1986, law enforcement must have a court order to find out what numbers you dial.
The PATRIOT act by statute expanded the same status to Internet traffic data, though apparently this had been more or less taken for granted by many courts before that.
FISA further extends the use of devices that track this meta-data by establishing a new clandestine court to grant the surveillance writs.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 795 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hey, look, there are laws about when the government can snoop metadata. Let's see what they are (Original Post)
Recursion
Jun 2013
OP
pipoman
(16,038 posts)1. And all can be remedied by
public outcry and statutory changes. Certainly you don't expect the general public to know all of this without public access? Why is this considered a leak if it is all above reproach? Why is the public outcrying? Maybe because we wish to trust those we elect to act in our best interest with liberal interpretations of our civil rights/liberties and calling out even veiled violations of those rights/liberties instead of passively continuing programs secretly established by previous congresses and presidents, eh?
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)2. What about the rest of the metadata?
The tower connection data, etc.?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)3. Cellular technology isn't my wheelhouse
I'll defer to somebody else on that