Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 10:30 AM Jun 2013

The more I read about Snowden, the more I think of my brother in law.

GED Certificate.

Short military time and some sort of Intelligence work.

Went to work for a private military contractor, where he is seemingly overpaid for his duties and skills.

Libertarian.

Likes women with 'issues' so that he can dominate them.

He's about ten years older than Snowden, and has been divorced twice, because eventually the women figure it out.


My brother in law is a self important dick, who believes his every action sets a standard for his fellow man. He views this as 'generosity.'


That's all I got.

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The more I read about Snowden, the more I think of my brother in law. (Original Post) onehandle Jun 2013 OP
The NSA is probably looking him up as we speak! boston bean Jun 2013 #1
Dear NSA overlords, He has guns. Be vewy vewy careful. Love, onehandle. nt onehandle Jun 2013 #2
I have 4 brother in laws graham4anything Jun 2013 #3
Why are you attacking him? BlueStreak Jun 2013 #4
I think I'm attacking my brother in law. onehandle Jun 2013 #5
Yeah, that's like focusing on rumors of Al Gore groping massage therapists instead of global warming cascadiance Jun 2013 #6
Exactly. It is intentional, and exposes the true agenda of many people here. BlueStreak Jun 2013 #7
Exactly. They don't want us talking about Google for Tyrants... backscatter712 Jun 2013 #30
"Google for Tyrants" :) BlueStreak Jun 2013 #33
Snowden made the ludicrous claim that he can spy on anyone in the world at any time. randome Jun 2013 #13
The Guardian quietly walks back their PRISM overreach without correcting previous reporting George Gently Jun 2013 #15
Illuminating BeyondGeography Jun 2013 #29
So what? What does that have to do with anything? BlueStreak Jun 2013 #16
His central claim, to me, is that any NSA employee can spy on anyone in the world. randome Jun 2013 #18
OK, then focus on that. The man is irrelevant. BlueStreak Jun 2013 #23
There is plenty of question about the value of the information treestar Jun 2013 #24
Nor are those who want to paint the man as a villain. The man is irrelevant. BlueStreak Jun 2013 #31
I don't think there is anyone trying to paint him as a villain treestar Jun 2013 #34
I heard he's going to be in the reboot of The Swan on Fox Floyd_Gondolli Jun 2013 #8
I bet he has a droid phone, too. nt Romulus Quirinus Jun 2013 #9
I hear he has this weird facial tic. sibelian Jun 2013 #12
No, that's bacon. Romulus Quirinus Jun 2013 #20
His father, on the other hand, smells of elderberries. 11 Bravo Jun 2013 #22
So what? you have issues with your brother-in-law. cali Jun 2013 #10
All you've got is petty smears on a man you've never met. backscatter712 Jun 2013 #11
What about the lavish praise of a man people never met? treestar Jun 2013 #25
And all you'll ever have. Pathetic n/t Catherina Jun 2013 #14
I've quit more things than I have completed Puzzledtraveller Jun 2013 #17
Dude. You should be working at the NSA. randome Jun 2013 #19
lol treestar Jun 2013 #26
Your BIL sounds like a teabagger I recently I argued with eissa Jun 2013 #21
But does your BIL quote Steve Scum Bag Jobs? HangOnKids Jun 2013 #27
Sounds like you don't know shit about either of them. nt Dreamer Tatum Jun 2013 #28
+10 avaistheone1 Jun 2013 #32
I think he's gay. Way too well groomed. DCKit Jun 2013 #35
I guess the Smear Machine has new talking points. former9thward Jun 2013 #36
Ron Paul fanboy. moondust Jun 2013 #37
 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
3. I have 4 brother in laws
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 10:38 AM
Jun 2013

The above is true in three of the four cases

LOL

(and those 3 were all, coincidentally divorced.
the 4th is happily married and not like the other three, also the youngest of the 5 kids.)

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
4. Why are you attacking him?
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 10:40 AM
Jun 2013

Why don't you talk about the important issue instead? There is no question that the information he divulged is true and vitally important. Character assassination serves no purpose. It doesn't matter who he is or what flaws he might have.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
6. Yeah, that's like focusing on rumors of Al Gore groping massage therapists instead of global warming
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 12:37 PM
Jun 2013

... issues that he's helped get so many people aware of and get a movement to try and solve.

Don't let those that want to use all of this information they've gathered on people through programs like this to manipulate the discussion on this win! I'm not saying Snowden should be a hero, unlike perhaps some do. But I do think we should be looking strongly at what he's talking about, and think about how as a human being we might be doing the same thing he's doing in his place if we had ethics.

I have a lot of strong disagreements with libertarians on many things, but civil liberties is where I have a lot of common grounds with them, and I think they have had a lot to contribute to our national discussions there. I've often said in the past that a smart Democratic leader might put someone like Ron Paul in charge of one of our intelligence agencies, or at least a watchdog agency that is monitoring them, to leverage him where his views are strongest and coincide with ours and not an area where perhaps libertarian philosophy would hurt our government.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
7. Exactly. It is intentional, and exposes the true agenda of many people here.
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 12:49 PM
Jun 2013

It is about civil liberties.

It is also about corporate profiteering.

It is also about wasteful government spending.

And it is about efficacy. like Reagan's "Star Wars" project that never passed a single test.

And if that puts me in agreement with Rand Paul and Bernie Sanders at the same time on this issue, I see no problem with that.

And if Obama doesn't want to get on board, then he will suffer the consequences.

The one thing it is NOT about is Snowden.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
30. Exactly. They don't want us talking about Google for Tyrants...
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 01:56 PM
Jun 2013

So instead, these slimebags play this disgusting game of character assassination.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
33. "Google for Tyrants" :)
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 02:14 PM
Jun 2013

It is a serious concern. Every year we see a greater commingling of the private and government, and nowhere is this incestuous relationship more evident than in the creation of this massive national dossier we are discussing presently.

I don't know exactly what Google may be doing in this regard. I do know that Google has the absolute maximum expertise in the largest searchable databases making them an attractive partner to the CIA and NSA. And I know that Google's business plan requires them to have all sorts of favors from the government to help them deal with the difficult markets like China. So I am simply not willing to assume that there is no collaboration going on here and none planned.

It is not sufficient to reflect nostalgically on the days when Google had as its corporate motto, "Don't be evil." That is as much a distant part of our history as is the Fourth Amendment.

"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power." (Benito Mussolini)

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
13. Snowden made the ludicrous claim that he can spy on anyone in the world at any time.
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 01:02 PM
Jun 2013

But offered no evidence of this.

Greenwald says the NSA has 'direct access' to all the Internet companies. They all deny this and are biting at the bit to give more information about the warrants they have received.

Snowden's other reveals are that phone records are scooped up (which the courts have held is legal) and Internet data is scooped up (which, so far as I know, has not been ruled on.)

Instead of giving us this information and letting us have an informed discussion, he chose to do this in the most melodramatic way possible.

From Hong Kong, he said "I am not here to hide from justice."

So why would we believe his and Greenwald's main claims of 'spy on anyone' and 'direct access'. So far, neither of them is credible. IMO.

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]

 

George Gently

(88 posts)
15. The Guardian quietly walks back their PRISM overreach without correcting previous reporting
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 01:08 PM
Jun 2013

"It’s worth noting the Guardian’s new take on the program broadly meshes with how Google has described their FISA court order compliance:"

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/42121_The_Guardian_quietly_walks_back_their_PRISM_overreach_without_correcting_previous_reporting

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
16. So what? What does that have to do with anything?
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 01:13 PM
Jun 2013

His central claim has proven to be accurate, and extensive. When you persist on ad hominem attacks on Snowden, this makes it look like you are just throwing out red herrings to try to distract people from the central issue.

Are you afraid to discuss the real issues?

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
18. His central claim, to me, is that any NSA employee can spy on anyone in the world.
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 01:16 PM
Jun 2013

He's offered no evidence of this.

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
23. OK, then focus on that. The man is irrelevant.
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 01:28 PM
Jun 2013

If there is no evidence, then the claim should not be accepted. Just like if there is no evidence of any actual difference in the handling of the 501(c)(4) applications from Tea Party and liberal groups, then that claim should not be accepted. It doesn't matter who raised the question, and mud slung at the person who raised the question does not change the truth of the question.

Stop attacking the man. Discuss the issues.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
24. There is plenty of question about the value of the information
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 01:30 PM
Jun 2013

and whether or not it should be revealed. But no one has discussed that for the past few days. Those who decided without further thought that he is a "hero" immediately upon hearing of him are not interested in any such discussion.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
34. I don't think there is anyone trying to paint him as a villain
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 02:43 PM
Jun 2013

Just a natural curiosity of the oddity of some of his proceedings.

Puzzledtraveller

(5,937 posts)
17. I've quit more things than I have completed
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 01:15 PM
Jun 2013

I was a easily forgettable C average student. Never finished college. Have had more relationships than I have fingers to count them. Been fired from jobs. Speeding tickets, expired registration(numerous times) and a DUI when I was 20.(I was still hired by PD with that on my record btw) Divorced, no kids. I have always been poor at managing my finances and do not know what my exact salary is at the moment.

I also am a veteran of the USAF and have been A fire fighter, in USAF and civilian. A corrections officer. A police officer. A EMT. A CNA. I am quiet. I keep to myself. I pretty much stay home once I get home from work as a caseworker in social services.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
19. Dude. You should be working at the NSA.
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 01:17 PM
Jun 2013

[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]

treestar

(82,383 posts)
26. lol
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 01:33 PM
Jun 2013

Someone with a DUI could never get a job as police officer where I live. The competition may not be as great in the other poster's area, though.

Sounds a bit like another well known poster - experience in very many things, including fires and EMT. Ought to become a journalist.

eissa

(4,238 posts)
21. Your BIL sounds like a teabagger I recently I argued with
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 01:20 PM
Jun 2013

regarding this topic. When I told him that corporations have more information on you than the government does, that anytime you search anything you'll magically see ads/get coupons in the mail for said items, his response was: no, I don't, I have AdBlocker. Yes, because if you can't see them, they can't see you

 

HangOnKids

(4,291 posts)
27. But does your BIL quote Steve Scum Bag Jobs?
Wed Jun 12, 2013, 01:34 PM
Jun 2013

And this sentence from you describes Stevie Scum himself:

"My brother in law is a self important dick, who believes his every action sets a standard for his fellow man. He views this as 'generosity.'

moondust

(19,972 posts)
37. Ron Paul fanboy.
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 12:20 AM
Jun 2013

The "architecture of oppression" sounds like something right out of the Ron Paul lexicon.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The more I read about Sno...