Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,078 posts)
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 04:32 PM Jun 2013

When will those 12 terrorist incidents be made public?

That NSA Chief, Keith Alexander said, in testimony, had been stopped by their PRISM program?

After all, they need to show something for all the money they have spent, I would think?

But don't hold your breath. It may still be classified and not open for public viewing? You will just have to take his word for it.

What we will probably get is something along the line that a deputy sheriff pulled over a car in some podunk town and when he ran a search on the car and driver, they found it in the database kept by the NSA. If there were a dozen incidents, I don't recall them being in the press or on TV? Perhaps I just missed them?

I am curious to see what they have done with the fortune that taxpayers have given them?

25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When will those 12 terrorist incidents be made public? (Original Post) kentuck Jun 2013 OP
It was probably one of those FBI sting ops. hobbit709 Jun 2013 #1
Oh yeah! kentuck Jun 2013 #3
Or the ones that couldn't have found the Sears Tower with a map and GPS. hobbit709 Jun 2013 #8
Ohhh...about the same time as Bush, Cheney, and CIA assassins and torturers are brought to trial. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #2
As soon as the government can create documents to support the claim. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2013 #4
They've already described two of them, and here on DU immediately after, those were called lies. JoePhilly Jun 2013 #5
Do you trust the NSA, Joe Philly? kentuck Jun 2013 #7
Thanks for proving my point. JoePhilly Jun 2013 #11
Not our fault people in Congress already said the domestic spy program added nothing to the event Hydra Jun 2013 #20
Hook, line, and sinker. hay rick Jun 2013 #22
Can you support either assertion? Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #10
Do you think that the NSA data is all they ever use? JoePhilly Jun 2013 #14
I have two points. One is that you said they'd named two cases, this is the only Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #15
why should they be? creon Jun 2013 #6
To verify that they existed at all? sibelian Jun 2013 #9
Have you forgotten this? Nimajneb Nilknarf Jun 2013 #12
If they want them secret, that means not using them as 'examples in a poke' Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #13
Shhh...those were double secret incidents... progressoid Jun 2013 #16
Classified !!!! Can't give the info out or the terrorists will win!!! Trust us!!! Autumn Jun 2013 #17
I think you have it. kentuck Jun 2013 #18
As soon as the Ministry of Truth can get the plotlines written out Hydra Jun 2013 #19
Didn't they say the same thing about waterboarding, but then said it was all 'classified'? ck4829 Jun 2013 #21
Probably the day after Hell freezes over. nt liberaltrucker Jun 2013 #23
The Bush White House did that all the time. bvar22 Jun 2013 #24
I think it was actually supposed to be *multiples* of 12 Art_from_Ark Jun 2013 #25
 

cherokeeprogressive

(24,853 posts)
4. As soon as the government can create documents to support the claim.
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 04:35 PM
Jun 2013

Then they'll redact everything but the words "the" and "and".

Intelligence work is hard...

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
5. They've already described two of them, and here on DU immediately after, those were called lies.
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 04:35 PM
Jun 2013

The folks who are freaking out are going to stay freaked out.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
11. Thanks for proving my point.
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 04:42 PM
Jun 2013

You just said you wanted to see details on the 12. Clearly, you don't. You have already decided. The NSA is lying.

FYI ... here is an article on one of the plots that was prevented.

When this came up on DU the other day ... the response ... LIE!!!

http://www.newsday.com/news/nation/nyc-subway-bomb-plot-stopped-by-nsa-secret-phone-program-official-says-1.5436071

Bottom line: Why ask for details when you aren't really interested in them?

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
20. Not our fault people in Congress already said the domestic spy program added nothing to the event
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 07:06 PM
Jun 2013

We and Congress are still waiting breathlessly for the super terrorist plot(s) that could only have been foiled by spying on everyone here 24/7.

Given how vague and emotional the appeals from these people have been, we're all a little skeptical of this overfunded and highly illegal spy system is working. After all, they blew $1 Billion just on Trailblazer.

Could you imagine how many people could have been fed with just that??

hay rick

(7,604 posts)
22. Hook, line, and sinker.
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 07:15 PM
Jun 2013

According to the article, the "senior U. S. intelligence official" claimed that the programs helped "disrupt" a plot to bomb NYC subways.

The article concludes:

Because the NSA and British intelligence work so closely together and so little is known about how the NSA monitors email traffic, it's possible that both agencies were monitoring the Yahoo address at the time Zazi sent the critical email in 2009.

What's unclear, though, is how the phone program aided the investigation, which utilized court-authorized wiretaps of Zazi and his friends.

Based on what's known about the phone-records program, the NSA might have had an archive of all the phone calls Zazi had made, which might have helped authorities look for possible co-conspirators.

Because the phone program remains classified, however, it's impossible to say with certainty how the program benefited the investigation.

Um, QED?
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
10. Can you support either assertion?
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 04:42 PM
Jun 2013

They claimed the subway bomber, but at the time they said they got the information from Scotland Yard. I believe them the first time.

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
14. Do you think that the NSA data is all they ever use?
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 04:49 PM
Jun 2013

The NSA data is used to, among other things, create leads.

Why is it hard to believe that, while following such leads, they worked with Scottland yard as part of the investigation?

Both the NSA data, and collaboration with Scottland yard, could easily occur together.

Those mechanisms are not mutually exclusive. Nor is their a requirement to name all methods leveraged in any specific investigation.

But my broader point is that even if the government provides details on these 12 events. It won't be enough for many, including the OP, who asked for the details but who is clearly not interested in them given their response to me above.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
15. I have two points. One is that you said they'd named two cases, this is the only
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 05:12 PM
Jun 2013

one I've seen and I'd like to see the other one. My second point is that if they did not just get a tip from Scotland Yard as they said at the time, they would have benefited from perhaps mentioning, even vaguely, that we are taking steps and precautions that assisted in nailing this guy. This is the time to say 'we are doing shit, it works, one day history will allow us to tell the whole story and credit those who deserve such credit' or some such thing.
If they had been making better choices communications wise, they'd not be in this hard of a spot, that's what I think.
I would be interested in the second example.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
13. If they want them secret, that means not using them as 'examples in a poke'
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 04:46 PM
Jun 2013

Secret means secret. It does not mean you get to mention that there are secret reasons to help yourself politically. That is not keeping a secret secret. That's pointing it out as a secret, the fist step to wide spread knowledge that there is a secret, then of what that secret is. Self indulgent to attempt to both hide and announce the same information.

Autumn

(45,055 posts)
17. Classified !!!! Can't give the info out or the terrorists will win!!! Trust us!!!
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 05:59 PM
Jun 2013

It's bullshit. Bet your ass they won't give the details.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
25. I think it was actually supposed to be *multiples* of 12
Fri Jun 14, 2013, 04:31 AM
Jun 2013

"Dozens", with an "s", I believe they claimed.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»When will those 12 terror...