Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 06:30 PM Jun 2013

Snowden smuggled out THOUSANDS of documents on a thumb drive.

But he thinks he's not like Bradley Manning because Snowden only leaked selectively.

Right. What's he going to do with the rest of the documents that he hasn't leaked yet? Use them to extort concessions from the US? Sell them to China? What's this unemployed computer guy going to do?

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/06/snowden-thumb-drive/

The dreaded thumb drive has struck the Defense Department again as word comes that NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden smuggled out thousands of classified documents on one of the portable devices, despite the military’s efforts to ban them.

Investigators also know how many documents Snowden downloaded from the NSA network and what server he took them from, according to the Los Angeles Times, quoting an unnamed official.

Officials have not indicated how many documents Snowden swiped, but the Guardian reported this week that Snowden left Hawaii with four laptops that “enabled him to gain access to some of the US government’s most highly-classified secrets.”

Snowden was a systems administrator, contracted out to the NSA by Booz Allan Hamilton. He worked at the NSA’s facility in Hawaii just four weeks before he asked for a leave of absence without pay, then absconded with the documents he’d siphoned from the NSA network on the thumb drive and flew to Hong Kong, where he’s been since May 20.

SNIP

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-snowden-nsa-secrets-thumb-drive-20130613,0,791040.story

Officials said they still don’t know how Snowden got access to an order marked “Top Secret” from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, or a highly-classified directive from President Obama authorizing a military target list for cyber attacks. Neither document would be widely shared, or normally available to a low-level NSA employee.

69 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Snowden smuggled out THOUSANDS of documents on a thumb drive. (Original Post) pnwmom Jun 2013 OP
How ironic Bonobo Jun 2013 #1
The Patriot Act was passed in public, not secretly, and it has never been a secret pnwmom Jun 2013 #4
"unidentified phone numbers" Bonobo Jun 2013 #7
No, it wasn't. Just phone numbers and number of minutes. pnwmom Jun 2013 #34
My my denial much? Most of the USPA is enacted IN SECRET nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #22
we don't cotton to USAPATRIOT around here.. frylock Jun 2013 #31
I'm not trying to justify the Patriot Act. I'm saying that there was plenty of debate pnwmom Jun 2013 #37
LOL ohheckyeah Jun 2013 #33
Not entirely the NSA's fault. Snowden was sneaky. randome Jun 2013 #2
I'd say he sacrificed enough for his country, then. dixiegrrrrl Jun 2013 #29
Awethumb pinboy3niner Jun 2013 #35
LOL -- a thumb drive up his ass Blue Owl Jun 2013 #61
They're lucky he wasn't recruited by Iran or Al Qaeda. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #3
He was a systems administrator and, as such, knew about the systems in place pnwmom Jun 2013 #6
"I know nothing about computers" Aerows Jun 2013 #16
How about a civil response to your comment? CakeGrrl Jun 2013 #28
Lax security Aerows Jun 2013 #30
Exactly Aerows Jun 2013 #19
Um, thumb drives are forbidden on sensitive computers NightWatcher Jun 2013 #5
Booz probably used regular PCs FarCenter Jun 2013 #10
This is the private sector you're talking about railsback Jun 2013 #11
I worked for a contractor and there were no USB sockets on mine NightWatcher Jun 2013 #12
It's irrelevant if there are USB ports or not Aerows Jun 2013 #17
Most of them are disabled..so he took 4 laptops too HipChick Jun 2013 #20
I said conscientious administrators Aerows Jun 2013 #21
But he was an administrator. So was he supposed to protect the system from himself? pnwmom Jun 2013 #36
It works excellently when people have a clue Aerows Jun 2013 #38
I wondered about that, too. And you usually have no printers available, either. So how come Nay Jun 2013 #64
And even if they are there Aerows Jun 2013 #26
This information is now going to China. Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #8
Going? It is already there. FSogol Jun 2013 #13
True. n/t Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #14
A Chinese agent with a Top Secret clearance inside Downwinder Jun 2013 #23
They better roll Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #24
trivial! compared to acceptance of egg on face Whisp Jun 2013 #15
If he were a paid Chinese agent... ljm2002 Jun 2013 #47
Extortion railsback Jun 2013 #9
Well, we've been assured that the spying done on American people is harmless and inconsequential. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #18
Think! He's threatening the lives of CIA agents in China. DevonRex Jun 2013 #25
Why would he care? OilemFirchen Jun 2013 #27
This is his pretend bargaining chip for those DevonRex Jun 2013 #39
Got that. OilemFirchen Jun 2013 #43
Sounds like a helluva good reason to get the CIA out of China. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2013 #45
He can't know DevonRex Jun 2013 #46
All I have to say Aerows Jun 2013 #32
I'm really concerned about who let him in to begin with. DevonRex Jun 2013 #40
Makes you wonder Aerows Jun 2013 #41
Yep. DevonRex Jun 2013 #44
Actually, you would be surprised Aerows Jun 2013 #48
Hope that didn't horrify anyone Aerows Jun 2013 #49
No DevonRex Jun 2013 #50
Physical Access is always the Aerows Jun 2013 #52
'somebody vouched for him' Whisp Jun 2013 #55
It wouldn't surprise me Aerows Jun 2013 #56
I think he was recruited for DevonRex Jun 2013 #62
I bet the problem is that the people in charge have a minimal understanding of computers pnwmom Jun 2013 #51
It wouldn't suprise me Aerows Jun 2013 #53
Are you in Human Resources and about to Aerows Jun 2013 #54
At the very top, you have military officers. They are very good at things they can see. FarCenter Jun 2013 #58
Sounds like he may have had help BeyondGeography Jun 2013 #42
He needed some help Aerows Jun 2013 #57
K&R Aerows Jun 2013 #59
did he take it with him to Hong Kong ? JI7 Jun 2013 #60
That's what the reports say. Other than hiding it, I don't know how he could prevent pnwmom Jun 2013 #65
So our intelligence agencies cannot even watch people with access to their own information The Straight Story Jun 2013 #63
Recommend! Release it all! morningfog Jun 2013 #66
This is not good at all! This guy is not trustworthy at all. hrmjustin Jun 2013 #67
This is really proof... NCTraveler Jun 2013 #68
I wonder if he's walked off with my half finished novel? sibelian Jun 2013 #69

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
1. How ironic
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 06:34 PM
Jun 2013

that he should have the charge of secretly stealing data leveled against him by the people who secretly stole the data of tens of millions of people.

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
4. The Patriot Act was passed in public, not secretly, and it has never been a secret
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 06:37 PM
Jun 2013

that unidentified phone numbers were being collected.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
7. "unidentified phone numbers"
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 06:43 PM
Jun 2013

It was a hell of a lot more than that. And yes, in secret. Much of most of it is still secret.

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
34. No, it wasn't. Just phone numbers and number of minutes.
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 07:55 PM
Jun 2013

If the government wanted more information, such as a wiretap, they'd have to go to the judge with probable cause and get a warrant.

And this collection of phone numbers was debated in public when the Patriot Act was passed, which you'd know if you'd been paying attention. It was no secret.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
22. My my denial much? Most of the USPA is enacted IN SECRET
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 07:12 PM
Jun 2013

Most hearings, when held are cosed door.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
31. we don't cotton to USAPATRIOT around here..
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 07:48 PM
Jun 2013

using that to rationalize this program is fucking ludicrous.

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
37. I'm not trying to justify the Patriot Act. I'm saying that there was plenty of debate
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 08:13 PM
Jun 2013

when it passed and everyone knew it involved collecting phone numbers. That wasn't a secret.

The only part of what Snowden said about this that was "news" turned out to be false. The Prism program collects data from foreign targets, not U.S.

ohheckyeah

(9,314 posts)
33. LOL
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 07:52 PM
Jun 2013

Exactly. They want us to trust them to use the data legally and in a responsible manner but can't even protect the friggin' information from being leaked. Trust them? Not in this lifetime.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
2. Not entirely the NSA's fault. Snowden was sneaky.
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 06:35 PM
Jun 2013


[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font]
[hr]

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
6. He was a systems administrator and, as such, knew about the systems in place
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 06:40 PM
Jun 2013

that were supposed to protect against unauthorized downloads.

I know nothing about computers but this seems like an extremely hard problem to solve -- everything seems to hinge on the honesty of the tech people.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
16. "I know nothing about computers"
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 06:57 PM
Jun 2013

Well that much is clear. This is about as easy to solve as a script and locking down the BIOS.

CakeGrrl

(10,611 posts)
28. How about a civil response to your comment?
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 07:31 PM
Jun 2013

This exposes his employer as having very lax security. They should know or should track who has the privileges of copying data to external media to thumb drives, but should rethink how or why they allow that capability. Seems pretty clear that he's abused his sys admin privileges at minimum.

They should at least have logged what was copied from his computer to the thumb drive.

I suspect he'll go down as a common data thief / trafficker of government documents rather than the hunted martyr.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
19. Exactly
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 07:02 PM
Jun 2013

This is dumb as stumps levels of technology and just as easy to prevent from happening.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
5. Um, thumb drives are forbidden on sensitive computers
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 06:39 PM
Jun 2013

None that I had access to even had USB sockets on them. I wonder what/how he figured that out.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
10. Booz probably used regular PCs
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 06:49 PM
Jun 2013

Normally, you'd install software to disable the USB ports for almost all employees, but a sysadmin would have the ability to turn them back on.

 

railsback

(1,881 posts)
11. This is the private sector you're talking about
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 06:49 PM
Jun 2013

The ones everyone here is trusting with their data.

NightWatcher

(39,343 posts)
12. I worked for a contractor and there were no USB sockets on mine
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 06:51 PM
Jun 2013

This guy just keeps looking like a criminal.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
17. It's irrelevant if there are USB ports or not
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 06:59 PM
Jun 2013

conscientious administrators lock them down both via hardware and via OS.

HipChick

(25,485 posts)
20. Most of them are disabled..so he took 4 laptops too
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 07:03 PM
Jun 2013

does that classify as stealing govt. equipment yet?

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
36. But he was an administrator. So was he supposed to protect the system from himself?
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 07:59 PM
Jun 2013

How is that supposed to work?

Clearly, the system failed. But that doesn't let him off the hook. He still stole documents. The fact that they made it too easy for him to do so doesn't mitigate his admitted crime.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
38. It works excellently when people have a clue
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 08:14 PM
Jun 2013

I don't work for Booz Allen. Maybe I should. It is clearly a circus there.

Nay

(12,051 posts)
64. I wondered about that, too. And you usually have no printers available, either. So how come
Fri Jun 14, 2013, 11:01 AM
Jun 2013

contractors get to flout all the normal and expected security measures? This thing is so effed up.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
26. And even if they are there
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 07:22 PM
Jun 2013

they are inaccessible if you have a halfway decent admin. I swear, Booz Allen sounds like Cletus the slack-jawed yokel of security firms.

"Some folk'll never lose a toe"
"But some folk'll"

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
8. This information is now going to China.
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 06:44 PM
Jun 2013

The new DU hero turned out to be a Chinese agent (likely paid) with a fake resume.

Downwinder

(12,869 posts)
23. A Chinese agent with a Top Secret clearance inside
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 07:14 PM
Jun 2013

the U.S. spook house? Heads going to roll over this?

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
15. trivial! compared to acceptance of egg on face
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 06:55 PM
Jun 2013

sis boom bah, China! yah, that's the ticket.

yah, Eddie! we will cheer even louder if some of the info you have results in a major attack in some large U.S. city! yah! you go, man! There are more people dieing from slipping on dog shit than terror attacks so who the hell cares about numbers. Numbers, Schmumbers!

ljm2002

(10,751 posts)
47. If he were a paid Chinese agent...
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 09:12 PM
Jun 2013

...it is highly unlikely that he would have gone public like he did.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
18. Well, we've been assured that the spying done on American people is harmless and inconsequential.
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 07:00 PM
Jun 2013

OTOH, NSA might be worried about us finding out who else they've been spying on.

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
25. Think! He's threatening the lives of CIA agents in China.
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 07:20 PM
Jun 2013

That was the other part he claimed to know - the names of operatives and station chiefs.

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
39. This is his pretend bargaining chip for those
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 08:45 PM
Jun 2013

pretend deadly agents who he warned the Washington Post reporter about. He's nothing but a poser trying to act smarter than he is, more important than he is.

He might have managed to steal a few things. But he's still a loser.

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
46. He can't know
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 09:01 PM
Jun 2013

Even close to what he claimed. Impossible. But he might have managed to learn a couple. But personally I'd play the game of chicken out and let the agents handle themselves. They've known since he popped up in HK and said what he did about identities.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
32. All I have to say
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 07:51 PM
Jun 2013

is that if you are upset that data got leaked look at who is in charge of the data.

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
40. I'm really concerned about who let him in to begin with.
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 08:47 PM
Jun 2013

That bothers me. Never should have happened. Somebody vouched for him. Or there's a background investigator out there who's doing a lot of damage.

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
44. Yep.
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 08:58 PM
Jun 2013

I'm not as worried about the system stuff because I know 2 things. One is that corporations have all this anyway, and unencrypted. I know they cannot be trusted.

Next, I know the security system isn't as he described it. That would be like a single sign-on system and it's ludicrous on its face. One guy being able to rewrite code from one location and bring down the entire intelligence network. No other humans involved, no other verification but computer code, passwords, etc?

Not only no but I'm still giggling.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
48. Actually, you would be surprised
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 09:14 PM
Jun 2013

do you use a salt for your password, and modify it based upon where you log in? If not, there are probably a few locations that can access your data at will. Using the same password is pretty much a recipe for your data getting accessed. Just food for thought.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
49. Hope that didn't horrify anyone
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 09:36 PM
Jun 2013

but it's the truth. Logs reveal you passwords, and if you use the same one over and over without variation, it's simple to hack. Use a salt. That way you can remember it, but it's a variation.

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
50. No
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 09:49 PM
Jun 2013

I'm talking about levels in which an actual physical presence is required to be verified at different stages, in different ways. When you're talking about agencies of analysts and cryptographers and programmers, other methods are used, especially when you're talking about rewriting code to make the system disappear completely. And it wouldn't be just one person, either.

That's why I giggled at him.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
55. 'somebody vouched for him'
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 10:07 PM
Jun 2013

yep, most likely there are others involved in a much higher position than Edward. Someone on the inside may have paved the way.

Remember than Glen knew Ed before Ed started working there. There are at least 3 people involved in all this at that level.

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
62. I think he was recruited for
Fri Jun 14, 2013, 01:26 AM
Jun 2013

something like this. People with resentment and a need to prove they're smarter than everybody else (especially the mean government they resent for not letting them be in the Green Berets) are low hanging fruit.

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
51. I bet the problem is that the people in charge have a minimal understanding of computers
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 09:50 PM
Jun 2013

so they just have to trust that the computer people working for them aren't working for the Chinese. Or anybody else.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
53. It wouldn't suprise me
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 09:56 PM
Jun 2013

You have some pure idiots in charge of hiring. I say that without malice, it's just the truth.

 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
58. At the very top, you have military officers. They are very good at things they can see.
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 10:28 PM
Jun 2013

Something like software and networking -- not so much.

I worked on a project managed by a retired Navy Captain -- It was all about how many "resources" do you have on this or that task. They can count people, severs, routers, etc., but they have very little understanding of what the people do or how the software is designed.

It was that way longer ago in commercial work, when minicomputers were new, and projects were run by electrical engineers who had never programmed computers.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
57. He needed some help
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 10:16 PM
Jun 2013

But it doesn't excuse the lax security at his firm. They are going to own that forever.

JI7

(89,247 posts)
60. did he take it with him to Hong Kong ?
Thu Jun 13, 2013, 10:37 PM
Jun 2013

even if he didn't want chinese authorities to see it could he prevent them from seeing it if they are able to get it from him ?

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
65. That's what the reports say. Other than hiding it, I don't know how he could prevent
Fri Jun 14, 2013, 11:52 AM
Jun 2013

them from seeing it.

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
63. So our intelligence agencies cannot even watch people with access to their own information
Fri Jun 14, 2013, 01:32 AM
Jun 2013

and they wonder why we find things worrisome?

sibelian

(7,804 posts)
69. I wonder if he's walked off with my half finished novel?
Fri Jun 14, 2013, 12:12 PM
Jun 2013

I am going to be SO FUCKING DISPLEASED if some plagiaristic Asian bastard brings out a sci fi epic featuring telepathic dolphins. IT WAS MY IDEA FIRST.

It's going to happen, isn't it?

BASTARDS.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Snowden smuggled out THOU...