General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumshe Dalai Lama Says Female Leaders Are More Compassionate ... Hmm
http://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2013/06/the-dalai-lama-says-female-leaders-are-more-compassionate-hmm/276843/As a Hindu, I often think that if I wanted to choose another religion to follow, it would be Buddhismand not just because I might get to hug Richard Gere. The Dalai Lama's recent comments in Australia about how his successor could be a woman only added light to my eyes, and made me exhale into a perfect Lotus pose.
Speaking at a press conference, the exiled 78-year-old leader, suggested that women were better equipped to lead the world in the current time. "If the circumstances are such that a female Dalai Lama is more useful, then automatically a female Dalai Lama will come," he said.
His Holiness Tenzin Gyatso was then asked about the bitter gender debate that is permeating Australian politics. Prime Minister Julia Gillard has been accusing her opposition Liberal Party of being sexist and removing women from the political sphere. Earlier this week, a menu for a Liberal Party fundraiser was leaked on social media. It carried the line: "Julia Gillard Kentucky Fried Quail: small breasts, huge thighs and a big red box." The chef who created the menu called it a joke that never made it out of the kitchen. He said that the opposition leaders had not seen the menu. Ms. Gillard called the menu "grossly sexist and offensive." The menu has gone viral and evinced reactions all over Australia. "Even when women ARE at the table, we're still on the menu," tweeted a woman in response.
The Dalai Lama responded to the gender question by referring to rising economic inequality around the globe. The world, he said, needs leaders with compassion. And in his mind, that means the world needs more female leaders.
LeftishBrit
(41,205 posts)they are not automatically more compassionate. Anyone remember Maggie Thatcher?!
Cirque du So-What
(25,932 posts)who overcompensated, attempting to emulate the aggressive, dispassionate traits typically associated with masculinity.
brooklynite
(94,508 posts)Cirque du So-What
(25,932 posts)True, the women you mention were hardly known for their compassion either, but I consider overcompensation a factor in both their cases as well. Perhaps they all felt that nurturing the characteristics typically associated with testosterone poisoning was necessary for their political success.
JI7
(89,247 posts)important . teachers and nurses are a good example.
but make everything more equal and what may appear to be differences might go away.
i think nixon had more compassion than thatcher and indira gandhi .
JackN415
(924 posts)They were politico-darwinian selected because the system stacked against them. Only the most ruthless, brutal, psychopath females made it to the top.
Many Asian Amy Chua tiger moms are psychopath. They would poison other children to enhance their own offsprings' chance at life.
JackN415
(924 posts)he has zero, zilch, nada, absolutely nothing to say about women because he has never married one.
He has zero experience with women. His credibility is zip.
Sorry His Holiness, you are so wrong to step out of your boundary of enlightenment. Oh.. if only I wish you had married one, then you would no longer make those statements.
MadrasT
(7,237 posts)Women are not more (or less) *anything* just because they are women.
JackN415
(924 posts)but I have female psychopath-radar, and it beeps a lot.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)As I said before, this kind of pronouncement is not a positive one for women.
It suggests they aren't capable of the same range of behaviors and emotions. It's bias hidden in what seems like a compliment.
JackN415
(924 posts)Orrex
(63,203 posts)You never know where it's going to pop up.