Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So Nadler walks back his claim of warrantless wiretapping (Original Post) Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 OP
Oh for gods sakes. He simply asked the question to someone else. dkf Jun 2013 #1
... Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #2
It isn't complicated at all, just very deceptive. reusrename Jun 2013 #16
Cali, the question is simple Savannahmann Jun 2013 #3
He did no such thing. HooptieWagon Jun 2013 #4
Yes, he did. Nadler released a statement today. Tx4obama Jun 2013 #13
Why are you posting a duplicate thread? nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #5
The truth shall set u free Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #6
Wow, talk about irony. nm rhett o rick Jun 2013 #7
... Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #9
Exactly. You arent interested in the truth. That statement says he was told to shut up. rhett o rick Jun 2013 #11
LOL reformist2 Jun 2013 #8
No, he's conveyed a message from the White House, that the public story is the public story. Marr Jun 2013 #10
Absolutely correct. He was probably out of line telling what he heard in a closed briefing. rhett o rick Jun 2013 #12
They got to him! Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #15
And even then you'll claim he's lying in order to protect the administration. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #22
Don't you understand maxrandb Jun 2013 #14
Trust the secret spying program. Bradical79 Jun 2013 #18
Trust those who are lying about there being a "secret" spying program uponit7771 Jun 2013 #20
BTW - Those "secret" spying programs go all the way back to our Revolutionary War maxrandb Jun 2013 #24
This. Bobbie Jo Jun 2013 #23
So I don't understand Bradical79 Jun 2013 #17
No, be OK cause it's not yours...period end of story. You don't like data being company owned then.. uponit7771 Jun 2013 #21
At this point I've REALLY become cynical of those who claim the government is the boogie man... uponit7771 Jun 2013 #19
 

reusrename

(1,716 posts)
16. It isn't complicated at all, just very deceptive.
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 09:34 AM
Jun 2013

Yes, they do need a separate warrant.

Yes. the analyst can access the phone calls without first getting a warrant.

The FISA law allows 72 hours after the fact to seek the warrant.

So, the truth is, the analyst has access, on his own, if he is verbally authorized to do so by either the Attorney General or the Director of National Intelligence.

That is the law, AFAICT.

 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
3. Cali, the question is simple
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 03:04 PM
Jun 2013

Do you believe that everyone involved in this mess is absolutely honest? Do you believe the more than 4 million TS clearance holders are never looking at the data unless specifically instructed to by someone with a warrant? Do you believe that the 1,000 + security contracting companies are not doing anything but sitting around twiddling their thumbs and playing minesweeper while waiting for a warrant to examine the data?

If that was the case, we wouldn't need Booz Allen and God alone knows how many others to contract on the data, we'd need four or five people on rotating shifts in one small office in Washington. You get a warrant, and you walk it down to Bob, who is the duty custodian. Bob examines the warrant, yawns and types his password, and the Prints out the relevant data, and logs it into the system. So why do we need so many people involved if they aren't doing anything with the data but holding onto it until instructed to examine it while under a warrant?

It's a lie, it's a patently, blatant, lie. So please don't insult my intelligence by pretending that there is nothing to this but hype. Because that is absolutely not the case, and anyone with a modicum of common sense should see that.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
13. Yes, he did. Nadler released a statement today.
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 05:04 PM
Jun 2013

-snip-

Update Rep. Nadler in a statement to BuzzFeed says: “I am pleased that the administration has reiterated that, as I have always believed, the NSA cannot listen to the content of Americans’ phone calls without a specific warrant.”

http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/video-congressman-claims-he-was-told-government-could-listen




-snip-

UPDATE: Nadler walked back his comments in a statement to BuzzFeed on Sunday. “I am pleased that the administration has reiterated that, as I have always believed, the NSA cannot listen to the content of Americans’ phone calls without a specific warrant," he said.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/15/nsa-phone-calls-warrant_n_3448299.html


 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
11. Exactly. You arent interested in the truth. That statement says he was told to shut up.
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 04:58 PM
Jun 2013

But if that makes you feel more secure, go for it. Just dont try to tell me you want the truth.

Denial apparently sets you free.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
10. No, he's conveyed a message from the White House, that the public story is the public story.
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 04:56 PM
Jun 2013

He hasn't said he misunderstood what was said in the private briefing, only that the White House has reiterated it's insistence that the public story is true, and that what he was told in the private briefing is not true.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
12. Absolutely correct. He was probably out of line telling what he heard in a closed briefing.
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 05:01 PM
Jun 2013

Until he says he was wrong and didnt hear what he thought he heard I wont by the cover up.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
22. And even then you'll claim he's lying in order to protect the administration.
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 10:00 AM
Jun 2013

Very neat trick you've engaged in--just refuse to believe anyone who says anything that you don't want to believe.

The very essence of conspiracy theory as faith--the lack of evidence or contradictory evidence are evidence of the conspiracy.

maxrandb

(15,295 posts)
14. Don't you understand
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 05:09 PM
Jun 2013

folks will only support and believe things that concur with their own beliefs.

Don't you know....government is evil, and all the folks serving in our military are just a bunch of babykilling, American-freedom hating jack-booted thugs, and there's NO DIFFERENCE BETWEEN the parties, and the Black Helicopters are coming to shoot drones through your bedroom window, and the government is watching you in the shower, etc, etc, etc., as the King of Siam said.

Anything that supports their narrative must be the gospel truth, and anything that questions their narrative is just government evil.

How long before someone here claims that "the government must have gotten to Rep. Nadler to get him to change his story"???

My guess...not that long, if it hasn't happened already.

maxrandb

(15,295 posts)
24. BTW - Those "secret" spying programs go all the way back to our Revolutionary War
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 05:43 PM
Jun 2013

What do you think helped prevent nuclear war over the last 50 years?

How do you think we managed to defeat the Axis powers in WWII, or WWI?

I'm sorry if you're just waking up to the fact that our country has covert operations, and has had them for it's entire history. I guess we should have just told the Germans where we planned to land on D-Day. I guess we should have just told Osama Bin Laden that we had found his location. I guess we should have just waited until a couple dozen commercial aircraft had been blown to bits over the Atlantic before we worried about catching the folks who planned it. I guess we should have just waited until the NY Subway was blown-up before we tried to prevent it.

Yes, as a matter of fact...I do trust the United States. It's why I am an American.

Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
23. This.
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 10:05 AM
Jun 2013

The libertarian tinfoilery has saturated this site.

The Ron Paul Revolution has found a new home in DU.

Congrats to the loyal patriots!

 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
17. So I don't understand
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 09:50 AM
Jun 2013

We should be ok with all information on our phone calls being collected and stored by the government because some guy says we should trust a secret warrant program that has no public oversight to not overstep?

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
21. No, be OK cause it's not yours...period end of story. You don't like data being company owned then..
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 10:00 AM
Jun 2013

...don't use there lines.

1979 was when these rules were set in motion

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
19. At this point I've REALLY become cynical of those who claim the government is the boogie man...
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 09:57 AM
Jun 2013

....it seems the crys of wolf are loud and numerous

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So Nadler walks back his ...