Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 09:23 AM Jun 2013

America Feeds the Rich

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/06/17-2



The Farm Bill that is expected to pass the U.S. House this week explains income inequality in America.

The Republican-sponsored proposal slashes food stamps for poor children and pads farm subsidies for wealthy agri-businessmen.

This comes just a week after Senate Republicans refused to protect the poorest students from doubled college loan interest rates because that required closing tax loopholes that benefit big corporations. It comes just weeks after a new study showed the Walmart heirs, among the richest people in the world, pay their workers so little that taxpayers fork over billions to subsidize Walmart's payroll through programs like -- food stamps.

This all violates America's cherished ideal of equal opportunity. Americans strive to achieve believing they have the same chance at success as everyone else and, more importantly, that the egalitarian American system will provide their children with a level playing field on which to attain their full potential. Americans believe their government should maintain that level field. But it does not. Not when poor students are denied access to low-interest college loans while Washington charges Wall Street virtually no interest. Not when the House farm bill feeds the rich and starves the poor.
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
America Feeds the Rich (Original Post) xchrom Jun 2013 OP
And a kick. nt LisaLynne Jun 2013 #1
Can't afford four more years of trickle down. Octafish Jun 2013 #2
+1 xchrom Jun 2013 #3
Let them die, and decrease the surplus population. bluedeathray Jun 2013 #4
And not when increasingly large amounts are spent on surveillance and security theater suffragette Jun 2013 #5
+1 million geardaddy Jun 2013 #6
Democracy is just an illusion. L0oniX Jun 2013 #7
Once They Are Born They Are Ignored,Scorned and Abused By The System grilled onions Jun 2013 #8
It's our legacy.. separate and unequal! mountain grammy Jun 2013 #9
Farm bill feeds the rich and starves the poor... What a waste.. midnight Jun 2013 #10
Normally I'm against censorship but... Initech Jun 2013 #11
When you raise a poor person's pay they become lazy, reusrename Jun 2013 #12
We have to get used to this Fox News / Heritage Foundation bullshit being passed as fact? Initech Jun 2013 #13
yep, get used to it reusrename Jun 2013 #14
All I have to say is fuck the Heritage Foundation. Initech Jun 2013 #15
And this: CrispyQ Jun 2013 #16
Pharoah sulphurdunn Jun 2013 #18
I'd like to feed the rich.... gilpo Jun 2013 #17

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
2. Can't afford four more years of trickle down.
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 09:51 AM
Jun 2013

Didn't work for the previous 32, yet that's the only game in town. Besides war.

suffragette

(12,232 posts)
5. And not when increasingly large amounts are spent on surveillance and security theater
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 10:10 AM
Jun 2013

Food, shelter, healthcare and education provide genuine security for more people. Prioritizing that funding would make our nation more secure.

grilled onions

(1,957 posts)
8. Once They Are Born They Are Ignored,Scorned and Abused By The System
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 11:20 AM
Jun 2013

The system supports only those at the 'higher end" of the population. The group" with already far too many advantages from being born into money or manage to live in a well enough household that offers them private education and or a job as soon as they want one. The advantages keep rolling on. Meanwhile the poor struggle from day one with hunger, poor schools and little direction or incentive to try and get somewhere. Jobs to them are on the bottom rung--minimum wage which offers no way up and out of their plight of being poor and staying poor. They are looked down upon like everything that is against them they caused themselves. The rich become the victors of spoils and the poor are just dragging the rich down to their level, some seem to think. There is no sharing. There is no understanding. There are no solutions because to the wealthy your lack of decent education,lack of a job that does not have CEO pay is all your fault. They gloat their way through life and blame the rest for trying to take advantage of them are their millions. This country was not built that way but it's turning out that way more every year,every spoiled generation.

Initech

(100,060 posts)
11. Normally I'm against censorship but...
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 11:43 AM
Jun 2013

I honestly would not have a problem if we rounded up every copy of Atlas Shrugged and threw them in a massive bonfire. Really fuck Ayn Rand and the philosophy of screwing the poor.

 

reusrename

(1,716 posts)
12. When you raise a poor person's pay they become lazy,
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 01:53 PM
Jun 2013

but when you raise a rich person's pay they become motivated.

It's just one of those things about life that we all have to get used to.

Initech

(100,060 posts)
15. All I have to say is fuck the Heritage Foundation.
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 02:34 PM
Jun 2013

They're an organization founded on the principles of benefiting the uber rich at the expense of the poor, and they're backed by the uber-greedy Koch brothers.

CrispyQ

(36,446 posts)
16. And this:
Mon Jun 17, 2013, 02:46 PM
Jun 2013
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023031600

Sacramento District Ignores Report Suggesting Closing Schools for Affluent White Kids, Instead Shutters Seven Schools Filled with Poor and Minority Kids.


The Sacramento city school district is poised to close seven elementary schools, disproportionately hurting students in low-income and predominantly minority neighborhoods. In response, twelve students and their parents filed a civil rights lawsuit, asking a federal court to block the closures. The suit claims that the Sacramento City Unified District's decision was motivated by an intent to discriminate against the minority populations and will result in "disastrous discriminatory effect on the poor, disadvantaged population which is served by these neighborhood schools slated for closure."

The complaint also notes that in choosing the schools it did for closure, Unified District ignored a report by a closure committee recommending the shuttering of four different schools in older, affluent neighborhoods, each with a 'white' student body in excess of 40 percent of the enrolled students.


Predatory capitalism, it's Shock Doctrine, institution by institution, state by state.



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»America Feeds the Rich