General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Terror Con: Booz Allen attempting to substitute terrorist for communist as the enemy of choice.
they are trying to terrify us for profit!!!!Robert Scheer's Columns
The Terror Con
Posted on Jun 18, 2013
..........................................
For defense contractors, the government officials who write them mega checks, and the hawks in the media who cheer them on, the name of the game is threat inflation. And no one has been better at it than the folks at Booz Allen Hamilton, the inventors of the new boondoggle called cyberwarfare.
Thats the company, under contract with the National Security Agency, that employed whistle-blower Edward Snowden, the information security engineer whose revelation of Booz Allens enormously profitable and pervasive spying on Americans now threatens the firms profitability and that of its parent hedge fund, the Carlyle Group.
Booz Allen, whose top personnel served in key positions at the NSA and vice versa after the inconvenient collapse of the Cold War, has been attempting to substitute terrorist for communist as the enemy of choice. A difficult switch indeed for the military-industrial complex about which Dwight Eisenhower, the general-turned-president, had so eloquently warned us.
But just when the good times for war profiteers seemed to be forever in the past, there came 9/11 and the terrorist enemy, the gift that keeps on giving, for acts of terror always will occur in a less than perfect world, serving as an ideal excuse for squandering resources, as well as our freedoms.
..........
much more:
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/the_terror_con_20130618/
Ednahilda
(195 posts)who works for one or another of these defense contractors. He's really proud of the fact that he doesn't work for the gummint. Too bad he doesn't realize he's being paid with taxpayer money laundered through his employer.
He asked us to fill out an FBI (?) form for him, as neighbors, when he was getting clearance. We declined, not because he isn't a nice guy (he is, despite his Fox habit), but because we didn't want to aid any part of the military-industrial complex.
Bad enough our tax money is sucked up by it.
Vinnie From Indy
(10,820 posts)a lemonade stand. The fact is that it is a con game and has been for a long time. 3.3 TRILLION for wars against an idea while American infrastructure crumbles, tens of thousands of Americans die early each year or suffer greatly from lack of health care and tens of thousands of Americans are killed by gun violence each year.
Another glaring example of the 1%'ers con game can clearly be seen in the way our government villifies Cuban communists but does everything possible to grease the skids to send American jobs to Chinese communists. The PTB love Chinese communists because they make oceans of money and hate Cuban communists because the remnant Cuban 1%'ers that fled after Batista hold political sway in South Florida.
Good post!
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)Robert Scheer IS A PAULITE.
and that means I do not care what he says on anything at all.
kpete
(71,979 posts)Vinnie From Indy
(10,820 posts)It appears that is your singular contribution to DU!
Cheers!
kpete
(71,979 posts)whose character exactly?
I only wanted to point out that our ears, eyes and mouth need NOT be SO careful...
peace,
kp
Vinnie From Indy
(10,820 posts)I might have been a bit too pointed in my response to graham.
Cheers!
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)I don't need to defend NOT standing with Rand and Ron, when it specifically says in the TOS NO Paulites.
Scheer strongly supported Rand for Senate, and Rand is one of the major obstructionists in the history of the senate, and Rand is working side by side with Jeb Bush, and would instantly take the VP with him if asked.
sorry, I do NOT stand with Rand.
He stands, I sit. He sits, I stand.
Rand Paul is against the advancement of OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.
On the rare times he might vote the same, he has a totally different reason for doing so.
kpete
(71,979 posts)but i still like reading Scheer,
shit, i even read BoBo sometimes...
peace, kp
Aerows
(39,961 posts)Who has been here far longer than you dreamed and is extremely supportive of civil rights?
Good grief.
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)the private companies giving bums like snowjob free reign to download whatever they want
as long as people are distracted by snowjob booz allen will keep selling our information to whoever offers the most money.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Works every time.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)If the USA didn't exist, would life in the world be 100% peachy keen for every single denizen of Planet Earth?
The bogeyman is that there are no bogeymen.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)He didn't harm many flies, but hundreds of thousands of people who posed no threat.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)are you saying NO ONE would have died in Vietnam had there been no war?
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)graham4anything
(11,464 posts)when the hyperbole stops, the conversation begins.
Hitler proved how many could be killed without the USA involvement.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Right?
Octafish
(55,745 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)kickeroo
MisterP
(23,730 posts)it used to be the Cath'liks in the 17th-19th c.
maybe the Doukhobors?
AzDar
(14,023 posts)Melinda
(5,465 posts)The Information Awareness Office (IAO) was established by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in January 2002 to bring together several DARPA projects focused on applying surveillance and information technology to track and monitor terrorists and other asymmetric threats to U.S. national security, by achieving Total Information Awareness (TIA).
This would be achieved by creating enormous computer databases to gather and store the personal information of everyone in the United States, including personal e-mails, social networks, credit card records, phone calls, medical records, and numerous other sources, without any requirement for a search warrant.[1] This information would then be analyzed to look for suspicious activities, connections between individuals, and "threats".[2] Additionally, the program included funding for biometric surveillance technologies that could identify and track individuals using surveillance cameras, and other methods.[2]
Following public criticism that the development and deployment of this technology could potentially lead to a mass surveillance system, the IAO was defunded by Congress in 2003. However, several IAO projects continued to be funded, and merely run under different names
Meet the new boss, same as the old...
Ever feel like just submitting?
K&R