A Perilous 'Searching for Monsters to Destroy' in Syria
http://www.thenation.com/blog/174850/perilous-searching-monsters-destroy-syria#axzz2WUbl8UKU
A member of a rebel group called the Martyr Al-Abbas throws a handmade weapon in Aleppo, June 11, 2013. (REUTERS/Muzaffar Salman)
The Constitution is clear. Written by revolutionaries fresh from a protracted battle against a colonial empire that was forever involving them in wars of whim, the document was designed to assure that the powers of war making and military adventuring would never be concentrated in the hands of a monarchor a president. So it is that, while the American president has from the founding of the republic been designated as the commander-in-chief, it is the Congress that retains the sole power to declare wars and to set terms for the engagement of the United States in the country in the attachments and entanglements in foreign affairs against which George Washington warned.
While it can be argued that presidents have the authority to act unilaterally to repel attacks and defend the country, there is far less justification for the wars of whim and casual military engagements that have come to define the United States in the latter part of the twentieth century and the first part of the twenty-first.
Yet, since 1941, succeeding executives have entered into wars, military engagements and schemes to aid foreign armies without ever seeking or receiving congressional authorization.
Often, the United States has policed the world without the informed consent of the American people, and without any evidence of the popular support that ought to be achieved before any country mingles its destiny with the struggles of distant lands.
Read more: A Perilous 'Searching for Monsters to Destroy' in Syria | The Nation
http://www.thenation.com/blog/174850/perilous-searching-monsters-destroy-syria#ixzz2WfL72Iuk
Follow us: @thenation on Twitter | TheNationMagazine on Facebook