Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 04:29 PM Jun 2013

For those who have a problem with Obama, don't take it out on local, state & congressional Democrats

...in 2014.

In some circles within and outside of the bloggosphere, I'm seeing/hearing people declare that they will sit out the 2014 midterm elections, primarily because they are angry with President Obama. (It makes absolutely no sense to me, but whatever.)

I'm asking--no, PLEADING--that if you or anyone you know are either thinking about or will definitely sit out, PLEASE, for godssakes, do not do that!!!

We are still suffering from 2010 because there were too many of us who sat out. (I'm not suggesting that Democratic turnout was low; I'm suggesting that too many of us did not vote in large enough numbers).

I'll give a recent example: I work for a federal agency that is primarily devoted to addressing homelessness and poverty. We just found out that the House version of the budget bill proposes 3/4 cuts to our budget. These programs primarily benefit the poor and working poor, Veterans, the elderly and disabled, women and children and other vulnerable populations.

I would argue that it's not and never has been about Obama. When we continue to see our budgets cut right before our eyes, it's very frustrating because the American people seem to be blaming the wrong people (person) for this, claiming that he and the Democrats don't care for the poor. But there is little the president can do if his agencies are not armed with the resources to administer our programs.

Anyway, the larger point is PLEASE, if you or anyone you know are thinking about sitting out, PLEASE do not hold it against those good Democrats running for lower level offices. Please do not sit out this upcoming midterm election.

Note: I know that some people will come at me with nasty comments and snide remarks; or, claim that they don't intend on sitting out. If this OP doesn't apply to you, then there's no reason to be nasty or rude. We are on the same side. But, if you know someone who intends on "punishing" Obama or the Democrats by staying home in 2014, PLEASE convince that person not to. At the very least, support local and state level Democrats. Republicans are kicking our ass at the state and local levels.

38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
For those who have a problem with Obama, don't take it out on local, state & congressional Democrats (Original Post) Liberal_Stalwart71 Jun 2013 OP
I don't think its a problem with regular Democratic voters...the base. HooptieWagon Jun 2013 #1
Good, but is there a way to talk to the disaffected and get them to understand why Liberal_Stalwart71 Jun 2013 #3
I agree whole-heartedly. HooptieWagon Jun 2013 #12
They don't understand that Rand/Ron Paul aren't progressives? They are bigots, for one. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jun 2013 #16
I know that. HooptieWagon Jun 2013 #22
i hope the grassroots/local progressives take a good look at UK politics and what happened re Blair Monkie Jun 2013 #14
Thanks for sharing. British politics is so very interesting... Liberal_Stalwart71 Jun 2013 #21
its getting the progressive base active before elections that is always the issue i guess Monkie Jun 2013 #23
no one's going to sit out. don't worry. allin99 Jun 2013 #2
More voters will certainly sit out the next election cycle railsback Jun 2013 #4
Then I suggest that... 99Forever Jun 2013 #5
No guilt trip. So is your argument that we shouldn't even try to push progressive Democrats to run Liberal_Stalwart71 Jun 2013 #9
Appartently, reading comprehesion isn't your strong suit... 99Forever Jun 2013 #10
Actually it seems that you need some valium to calm down a bit. Your rudeness is Liberal_Stalwart71 Jun 2013 #13
Run away, frightened little man. 99Forever Jun 2013 #15
and i dont mean to be disrespectful, but this is what the left failed to "suck up" Monkie Jun 2013 #24
You're wasting your words. 99Forever Jun 2013 #30
Then what would you say DonCoquixote Jun 2013 #28
It's basically shallow and useless to sit out Rosa Luxemburg Jun 2013 #6
I won't. But I will heavily judge their opinion on the spy programs davidn3600 Jun 2013 #7
me too... HooptieWagon Jun 2013 #17
Kick. GOTV! FSogol Jun 2013 #8
I think you will have trouble with your 'moderate centrist' candidates as you did in 2010 Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #11
Luckily I no longer have a Blue Dog representing my district. Maryland pretty much got rid of Liberal_Stalwart71 Jun 2013 #18
for those with a problem with potus just remember SCOTUS SCOTUS SCOTUS leftyohiolib Jun 2013 #19
You better believe every Democrat in my state of NC octoberlib Jun 2013 #20
Thank god my LOCAL elections are non partisan nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #25
In just SIX DAYS, there is a major senate race in Mass. and it is nail biting close. One vote might graham4anything Jun 2013 #26
We should do a grass roots revolt to take over the Dem. party and replace all corporate cronies. limpyhobbler Jun 2013 #27
I am voting for the Rs in my town next election bigwillq Jun 2013 #29
Local politics is all I care about. Blue_In_AK Jun 2013 #31
I am an Inspector of elections in my local ward life long demo Jun 2013 #32
I was only the 3rd Democrat in my district to vote in the primary tabbycat31 Jun 2013 #36
All politics is local. JaneyVee Jun 2013 #33
oh, my local democrats will hear from me as well. They suck at funding education. liberal_at_heart Jun 2013 #34
Very, very true. n/t Fire Walk With Me Jun 2013 #35
I will be happy to vote for Bill Halter for Governor of Arkansas Art_from_Ark Jun 2013 #37
I will not. I can think Obama is a disappointment but still know dems HAVE to win elections. I..... Logical Jun 2013 #38
 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
1. I don't think its a problem with regular Democratic voters...the base.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 04:43 PM
Jun 2013

But I suspect it will be a problem with sporatic voters, like youth, and with some moderate swing voters.

And of course, any Dem Representative supporting Obama's surveillence state may face a backlash from their constituents. My Rep is GOP, so I'll be voting against him regardless.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
3. Good, but is there a way to talk to the disaffected and get them to understand why
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 04:54 PM
Jun 2013

supporting local progressive Democrats is good? If the issue is that Congress needs to exercise oversight and put restrictions on presidential powers, wouldn't it make sense to get MORE progressive Democrats in Congress who will do just that?

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
12. I agree whole-heartedly.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 05:24 PM
Jun 2013

But here in Fl there's a shortage of progressive Dems for them to vote for. State and local parties are tightly controlled by DLCers, who view progressives as a greater enemy than republicans. Only heavily african-american demographic congressional districts have a chance of getting a progressive on the ballot. Very dysfunctional party structure here. Youth voted for "Hope and Change", but understandably dissillusioned now. Ron Paul had a lot of youth support here...seriously, they're looking for change, not same ol', same ol'.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
16. They don't understand that Rand/Ron Paul aren't progressives? They are bigots, for one.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 05:26 PM
Jun 2013

And they are nowhere near progressives when it comes to gay rights and women's reproductive choices.

I don't understand it.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
22. I know that.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 05:40 PM
Jun 2013

I've talked to some young friends, try to explain differences, while still being respectful of their views and not beat them over the head. Basically, they want change from the status-quo, any change, and they're not terribly interested in the details.
I've actually had a bit better luck with a couple conservative youth. One guy in particular, he and I played some gigs together, his family very heavy players in GOP. His dad and step-mom hosted a party during GOP convention, attending were Mitt, Ryan, all the GOP Congressional leadership, all the FOX talking heads...serious shit. His folks made him attend and meet everyone. As soon as he could slip out, he dashed to a local bar where musicians hang out together. He looked like he saw a ghost...said actually meeting those peeps made him terrified at prospects of them running the country. LOL, he's becoming more and more liberal...doesn't hurt that theres a lot of gay musicians in area hes met and played with, its a complete non-issue with him.

 

Monkie

(1,301 posts)
14. i hope the grassroots/local progressives take a good look at UK politics and what happened re Blair
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 05:26 PM
Jun 2013

at the last election a lot of the natural base stayed home, voted 3rd way (almost unheard of in england due to how elections work) or held their nose and voted right wing knowing it would mean cuts and privatisation.
and now, after the cuts, after the privatisation, after 3rd way betrayed the voters and sided with the right wing party, the vote of the let has still not recovered enough for them to win outright even with the vote share of the 3rd way centrists having collapsed in polls.
and now the progressive party is still divided, the "realists" are still trying to out maneuver the right wing party, and the only reason they will have a chance next election is because there is a 4th way appearing more right wing than the conservatives.
it is a real mess.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
21. Thanks for sharing. British politics is so very interesting...
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 05:35 PM
Jun 2013

What I never understood is why people are convinced that staying home makes any difference. They stay home because they are angry that their representatives aren't progressive enough. By them staying home, they allow more wingnuts to get elected, but then they wonder why the president/Democrats can't get more progressive legislation through. DUH!! It's because YOU stayed home and allowed the Republicans to take over. So, the answer is NOT to stay home again. The answer is to do everything we can to elect as many progressive Democrats to state and local offices as possible. Same with Congress. Perhaps we fail one or two election cycles. But the point is not to give up. If the Teabaggers never give up, then why should we?

I've shared a personal story about this many times here: about how progressive Democrats kept losing to this one Blue Dog Democrat. This particular Democrat was popular, had money, prestige and name recognition. And no matter how good his progressive contender was, he would win outright each time. Until 2006, we finally got rid of this jerk and got a real progressive in the seat. Her name: Donna Edwards. It took awhile, but not giving up the fight eventually won it for us.

We can't give up.

 

Monkie

(1,301 posts)
23. its getting the progressive base active before elections that is always the issue i guess
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 05:46 PM
Jun 2013

i hear you clearly on why it is so difficult, and where the problems lay, people feel betrayed by the "team" it looks like, the colours, and dont realise or are not motivated to realise that they can also chose how these "teams" are represented.
and you are right about the right too, look at how they started to fight back in the 70's and how long it took for them to capture the complete narrative. but they did not give up.

i think real progressives have a difficult choice, try a 3rd way centrist split like happened in the uk, and spend 20+ years in the wilderness, or really break hard with the DC "crowd" that people are so disgusted with, and which of those two is the scariest option?
i think the mistake that was made in the UK was that those progressives feared breaking with the legacy of blair to much, and listened to the fear mongers who claimed there was no place for progressives only for "right wing lite".
i think regular voters in that case will chose the "real thing", progressives need to trust that a anti-war, pro-labour, anti-corporate message will resonate across the political spectrum, and the fact that this space is empty, and can be "owned" convincingly.

 

railsback

(1,881 posts)
4. More voters will certainly sit out the next election cycle
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 04:57 PM
Jun 2013

as the GOP are getting armed to the teeth with 'evilness' supplied by the Left. Make no mistake they will bang people over their heads with it, over and over and over… I had high hopes for 2014. Not anymore. I vote every election, but know plenty who don't if they're not motivated to do so. That's just a microcosm of what's going to happen.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
5. Then I suggest that...
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 04:59 PM
Jun 2013

... Democrats start acting like actual Democrats and less like Republican Lite. Save your guilt trip for someone who still doesn't mind being lied to, over and over and over...

Jes sayin'.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
9. No guilt trip. So is your argument that we shouldn't even try to push progressive Democrats to run
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 05:12 PM
Jun 2013

because what we have now are "less than" Democrats? Yeah, that makes sense.

And again, your rudeness is not necessary. Take it somewhere else.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
10. Appartently, reading comprehesion isn't your strong suit...
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 05:17 PM
Jun 2013

.. if that what you got out of my reply. Sorry you find reality to be rude, must suck to have to deal with that personal problem.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
13. Actually it seems that you need some valium to calm down a bit. Your rudeness is
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 05:24 PM
Jun 2013

off the charts. It's uncalled for. My reading comprehension is fantastic, by the way.

Maybe you need a day or two off.

Oh, and welcome to IGNORE!!

 

Monkie

(1,301 posts)
24. and i dont mean to be disrespectful, but this is what the left failed to "suck up"
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 05:54 PM
Jun 2013

in the UK, people have real reasons to be angry, you personally are not to blame, but you have to have the answer that these people need to hear, they may not say what you want to hear politely, but you have to have a answer that appeals to these voters and acknowledges the problems partly caused by what they see as "your team".

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
30. You're wasting your words.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 06:36 PM
Jun 2013

People like this think that daring to disagree with them is "rude," FFS. They DON'T have "an answer" except for "they are worse than us." Being the "better" of two crappy choices doesn't cut it anymore, not for me, and not for millions of other people. I'll be damned if I'll vote for Republican Lite in ANY effen election, ever again. And I ain't alone.

DonCoquixote

(13,616 posts)
28. Then what would you say
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 06:19 PM
Jun 2013

to the democratic candidates that are not trying to act like Obama? That's not a guilt trip, that is stating that if we do not try to find those who could be what we want, then it just will not happen.

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
7. I won't. But I will heavily judge their opinion on the spy programs
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 05:06 PM
Jun 2013

If a so-called Democrat says they fully support the NSA program to spy on Americans....that could be a problem for me.

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
17. me too...
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 05:27 PM
Jun 2013

although my rep is an R and won't get my vote anyway. But I'd have a hard time voting for a Dem who supports a surveillence state.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
11. I think you will have trouble with your 'moderate centrist' candidates as you did in 2010
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 05:22 PM
Jun 2013

That will not be a problem for those of us who already run and elect actual Democrats. Our 2010 turnout was excellent. Not much I can do for your Blue Dogs and Tea Dogs or whatnot.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
18. Luckily I no longer have a Blue Dog representing my district. Maryland pretty much got rid of
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 05:28 PM
Jun 2013

the last of the Blue Dogs...well...maybe one or two are left, but not in the congressional districts that make a difference. They are mostly rural districts.

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
26. In just SIX DAYS, there is a major senate race in Mass. and it is nail biting close. One vote might
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 06:13 PM
Jun 2013

make a difference

EVERYONE in Mass. needs to vote as if their vote is the deciding vote.

Forget any poll reading it either way

Every single vote is needed.

and then another major senate seat in October, and the republican is a billionaire and a friend of the Koch Family
(though the republican governor don't even like him he is so extreme).

But it will be October, and a small turnout hinges on who brings the voters out.

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
27. We should do a grass roots revolt to take over the Dem. party and replace all corporate cronies.
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 06:18 PM
Jun 2013

At every level.

 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
29. I am voting for the Rs in my town next election
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 06:21 PM
Jun 2013

The DEMS are so bad. They need to go. They've been there too many years. The town's a mess, and they just raised the mill rate by 12 mills. I can't believe they had the balls to do that in this poor economy.

life long demo

(1,113 posts)
32. I am an Inspector of elections in my local ward
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 08:40 PM
Jun 2013

Democratic of course. This was for the primary in May. There are 5 wards in my township, each divided into 2 sections. The ward that I'm in is Ward 1-1, there is also a 1-2. In ward 1-1, only 3% of the democrats showed up. This was for Jury commissioner, common pleas and supreme court judges, school board and tax collector. 3%. It was depressing.

tabbycat31

(6,336 posts)
36. I was only the 3rd Democrat in my district to vote in the primary
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 08:55 PM
Jun 2013

Granted it was everyone running unopposed, but I vote anyways. When the little old lady at the polls found my name in the book, she very condescendingly said to me "you're a registered DEMOCRAT" and you have to vote in that primary. I then explained that I was a proud registered Democrat and I did not like her attitude.

And people wonder why I usually vote by mail. I've got another primary to vote in (August), then I get to vote again in October and November. And I am super fired up to vote the brilliant man who decided on an October election out of office.

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
37. I will be happy to vote for Bill Halter for Governor of Arkansas
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 09:59 PM
Jun 2013
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1039133

as well as any Democrat who can challenge the 3rd District representative.
 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
38. I will not. I can think Obama is a disappointment but still know dems HAVE to win elections. I.....
Thu Jun 20, 2013, 10:20 PM
Jun 2013

even donated and campaigned for Obama in 2012. Even thought I knew he disappoint me.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»For those who have a prob...