General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsQuinn: If I知 Mayor And Kelly Wants To Keep Job, Stop-And-Frisk Must Come Down...
As the race has heated up, City Council Speaker Christine Quinns support for Police Commissioner Ray Kelly has cooled off, CBS 2s Steve Langford reported.
For voters, one politicians flip-flop may be anothers badly needed course correction, so as Democratic candidates for mayor jostle for primary votes come September, the potentially radioactive issue of the citys stop-and-frisk program and the future of its chief champion have one of the leading contenders for City Hall changing course.
If Im mayor, Ray Kelly will be offered that job with the clear charge you get stop and frisks down. You do that constitutionally. If you cant agree to that, dont take the job. If you take it and you dont do it, youll get fired, Quinn said...
more - http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2013/06/20/quinn-if-im-mayor-and-kelly-wants-to-keep-job-stop-and-frisk-must-come-down
JustAnotherGen
(31,781 posts)The NYPD is about the equivalent of the LAPD so it's not going to happen. It's a nice try and she can say that - but it's not going to happen.
premium
(3,731 posts)had been ruled unconstitutional, at least part of it, no reason why she can't put a stop to the rest of it.
Manhattan Federal Court Judge Shira Scheindlin ordered police to refrain from making some trespass stops outside private residential buildings even though the landlord has given officers permission to do so as part of the NYPDs Clean Halls program.
"While it may be difficult to say when precisely to draw the line between constitutional and unconstitutional police encounters such a line exists, and the NYPD has systematically crossed it when making trespass stops outside buildings," Scheindlin wrote in a 157-page ruling.
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nypd-controversial-stop-frisk-policy-ruled-unconstitutional-article-1.1235578#ixzz2Wsg2Rtdb
JustAnotherGen
(31,781 posts)I'm sorry. It's just not going to stop. I'm realistic about my country and it's ways. Unconstitutional or not -there are bad apples and assholes on that police force and it is GOING to happen. She can say whatever she wants. Doesn't mean it's going to actually GO that way.
It's like this - you aren't supposed to discriminate in housing or hiring either - right?
Do you REALLY think it doesn't happen anymore?
NYC or the boondocks of TN - doesn't matter. I don't believe we get the same rights. All the laws and judges in the world aren't going to change that.
And once she gets elected - watch that issue go to the wayside at a pretty fast clip.
premium
(3,731 posts)I guess I'm used to living in a county where our Sheriffs Office is very supportive of civil rights.
JustAnotherGen
(31,781 posts)About NYC. Look up some of the shootings and stuff that have gone on there by the cops. She can't control the cops.
I believe probably in about 100 years or so America will get this figured out - but by then I believe the power structure will be mostly latino/hispanic and they'll think this old shit about black folks being inherently up to no good is silly.
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)With respect to the limited ruling in which the court held that stop-and-frisks outside private residential buildings without probable cause were unconstitutional:
"The NYCLU argued that Clean Halls, which exists in 8,000 buildings citywide, leads to people being hassled by cops near their own abode for no legitimate reason.
"The legal challenge centered on the case of Jaenean Ligon, who in August 2011 sent her 17-year-old son to buy ketchup for the familys dinner.
"Two plainclothes cops stopped and frisked the teen outside the familys building and then asked Ligon to come downstairs to identify her son, according to court documents.
"The mother of three testified the request sent her into a panic because she feared the worst that her son had been seriously hurt or killed.
Major Nikon
(36,818 posts)Her rulings have created real change to NYPD's policies, however stop-and-frisk(under certain circumstances) remains constitutional per the 1968 SCOTUS ruling.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terry_v._Ohio
Indi Guy
(3,992 posts)...Don't you find it encouraging that the practice of "stop and frisk" is becoming so unpopular that politicians are running against it?
JustAnotherGen
(31,781 posts)That walking while black will stop in my lifetime. I'm sorry - related the other day . . .my dad had a DWB four months before he died, making an ice cream run, pulled over four houses from where he lived for 35 years - in NY State. A town where he had been a school board member, head of little league, and my mom was a former town council member.
This 2011 this happened.
America is a cesspool of this shit and it will not be changing in my lifetime. These are just platitudes and bones being thrown but it's not going to change at the individual cop level. She can say what she wants - doesn't mean they are going to stop.
Look at what they did to my fellow citizens in NJ? You heard how they were snooping on New Jerseyans just because they practice Islam. And they got away with it. Nary a slap on the wrist. I'm a cynic.
Indi Guy
(3,992 posts)...your reasons for being cynical. This understood, I do however find it encouraging that public sentiment against blatant racist practices by "authorities" has increased to the point where it's politically expedient for political candidates for high office to open that discussion (whether or not they're honest brokers).
Also, I've posted & replied to many threads on the subject of stop & frisk many times on DU -- and this is the first time I've seen this kind of traction.
premium
(3,731 posts)if I lived in NYC, I would be voting for her just on this issue alone.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)premium
(3,731 posts)I thought she was in favor of doing away with stop and frisk. Did I mis-interpret?
allin99
(894 posts)but it is perfectly applied to her. srsly, i live in ny, she's horrible.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)allin99
(894 posts)did to ny'ers helping him overturn term limits is unforgivable.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)allin99
(894 posts)give to the pac.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)i saw that add too
did you watch the debate? why was weiner so deadpan? boring
allin99
(894 posts)weiner isn't ready, he is like limp noodle all the time unless he's on a soap box, then he's "ok", i don't understand why so many women were so into him. lol.
yeah, at this point, if he had any sort of charisma what-so-ever i think he could beat quinn, cuz she is so abrasive and obnoxious, and ridiculous, but she got way lucky, he's just a total yawn-fest.
premium
(3,731 posts)I'll take your word for it, I don't even live anywhere near NY, I live in NV., a very rural part of NV.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)about her as much as new yorkers do
premium
(3,731 posts)more than fair and I deserved it.
La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)who was largely responsible for creating these crazy racist policies
almost all her challengers are better on this issue than her
premium
(3,731 posts)allin99
(894 posts)first and foremost she helped pave the way for bloomberg's third term after ny'ers voted for term limits a number of times.
she also blocked the paid sick leave bill for 3 years before finally caving, and she only caved b/c it was an election year.
if you've ever seen her speak, she spends half the time acting like a freakin' clown, is never serious because she has nothing to say, i mean, she is really the pits.
allin99
(894 posts)premium
(3,731 posts)that's what I get for shooting my mouth off before finding out what she's all about.
Thanks for the info and I think I'll stay out of NYC politics and stick to Nevada politics.