Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 07:25 PM Jun 2013

Who is your pick for 2016


35 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited
Hillary Clinton
3 (9%)
Howard Dean
5 (14%)
Martin O'Malley
0 (0%)
Elizabeth Warren
14 (40%)
Other
2 (6%)
Too early
11 (31%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
91 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Who is your pick for 2016 (Original Post) ProSense Jun 2013 OP
Dennis Kucinich. nt ZombieHorde Jun 2013 #1
Honestly, I wish that wing of the party had a better standard-bearer than kooch. Warren DeMontague Jun 2013 #13
And what, specifically, is wrong with him? Ignoring the 25 year long smear campaign, what has he Egalitarian Thug Jun 2013 #26
He's just not presidential material. He doesn't have a chance of ever winning that nomination. Honeycombe8 Jun 2013 #30
I don't disagree that Americans are profoundly ignorant and shallow, I was Egalitarian Thug Jun 2013 #35
Well, there's this... bluedigger Jun 2013 #61
Is this supposed to make a point? An answer? He's not good looking? He wants to make a nice paycheck Egalitarian Thug Jun 2013 #66
He's a contributor to Fox News. bluedigger Jun 2013 #69
You don't think there's difference between doing it while in office and after? Egalitarian Thug Jun 2013 #74
You mean, aside from the UFOs? Okay, for one I -did- support him early in the '08 primary process Warren DeMontague Jun 2013 #65
You think that a known fraud, a notorious and completely transparent con-man that created Egalitarian Thug Jun 2013 #73
there's that, too. Warren DeMontague Jun 2013 #75
While it's a sad commentary on US zeeland Jun 2013 #60
It doesn't even matter what he thinks amuse bouche Jun 2013 #89
Hillary! MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 #2
+1 ...for war, drones and the National Snooping Asscarrots. L0oniX Jun 2013 #3
I almost said Martin O'Malley Warren DeMontague Jun 2013 #4
After Clinton/Obama, NO MORE DINOS, DLC, Third Way, Blue Dogs, or "New" Democrats. blkmusclmachine Jun 2013 #5
If we can't knock them out of key leadership positions, it's time to form a third party yurbud Jun 2013 #7
+billions Nt newfie11 Jun 2013 #20
+1000 forestpath Jun 2013 #11
It's too bad Obama can't run for a third term. ProSense Jun 2013 #45
Who do I want to win or who do I think will win? Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #6
I would be surprised if it wasn't Hillary, but her campaign seemed to stumble badly last time yurbud Jun 2013 #8
How about who you would vote for in the primary? Warren DeMontague Jun 2013 #14
Right now, my gut is telling me I want Biden... Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #16
I dont think he's going to run. Warren DeMontague Jun 2013 #18
oh... I had forgotten about that... Yeah, that was not very good Ohio Joe Jun 2013 #33
Right, cause Senator Citibank is such a great champion of the "little people". Egalitarian Thug Jun 2013 #28
Al Franken and Jill Stein...nt SidDithers Jun 2013 #9
Who are you and what have you done with Sid? Warren DeMontague Jun 2013 #19
LOL !!! WillyT Jun 2013 #21
I just want a Franken / Stein bumper sticker... SidDithers Jun 2013 #22
Yowch. Warren DeMontague Jun 2013 #24
Thread winner! RetroLounge Jun 2013 #62
How about a Franken/Weiner? graham4anything Jun 2013 #77
DUzy HappyMe Jun 2013 #86
I don't think Franken has a chance, but I'd consider him, if he'd run. nt Honeycombe8 Jun 2013 #32
I wish Brian Schweitzer wanted the job Warpy Jun 2013 #10
Dean and Schweitzer would be a dream ticket. nt grasswire Jun 2013 #36
You and me both. ForgoTheConsequence Jun 2013 #76
I would vote for anyone who is the democratic candidate for President, however. graham4anything Jun 2013 #12
So you see Hilary Proud Public Servant Jun 2013 #64
Oklahoma is ripe for the picking. graham4anything Jun 2013 #72
That would be the same Oklahoma Proud Public Servant Jun 2013 #90
A woman might get a different vote & women make up 52%, don't they? graham4anything Jun 2013 #91
The Eagles in 6 games burnodo Jun 2013 #15
Sherrod Brown tends to make the most overall sense to me. TheKentuckian Jun 2013 #17
I voted "Other" thinking primarily of Sherrod Brown Jim Lane Jun 2013 #85
I'm waiting to see where they stand on surveillance. dkf Jun 2013 #23
I don't care as long as it is an all female ticket. DURHAM D Jun 2013 #25
"we have a very shallow bench compared to the Republicans." BlueStater Jun 2013 #29
We have exactly one A-lister. DURHAM D Jun 2013 #37
Christie is the only serious candidate of that bunch. BlueStater Jun 2013 #39
The vast majority of Americans do not vote on issues or substance. DURHAM D Jun 2013 #44
Christie is discourteous and downright mean. He can't control his temper JDPriestly Jun 2013 #79
Not fair Prosense, you need to vote in your own poll!! n-t Logical Jun 2013 #27
No, I don't "need to." Did you vote? n/t ProSense Jun 2013 #31
Yes, for Warren. And I know you don't "need" to but it would be nice. n-t Logical Jun 2013 #38
If you insist ProSense Jun 2013 #42
Well, I 100% agree with you on that one! n-t Logical Jun 2013 #54
Kamala Harris? graham4anything Jun 2013 #80
My vote? Elizabeth Warren, but I know full well it will never happen 1-Old-Man Jun 2013 #34
GOTTA be someone other than the usual also rans... n/t cherokeeprogressive Jun 2013 #40
Too fucking early!!! And it will NOT be Liz Warren. longship Jun 2013 #41
Her running is just a pipe dream around here. BlueStater Jun 2013 #46
Agreed. But she will be a great Senator. longship Jun 2013 #48
It's amazing how DU's 2016 Dem poll have Warren leading, Jamaal510 Jun 2013 #43
I doubt if Senator Warren has 40% name recognition. DURHAM D Jun 2013 #47
Hillary is inevitable? MannyGoldstein Jun 2013 #51
The national polls which do not sample a Agschmid Jun 2013 #57
Believe elsewhere, DU is not the real world. Beacool Jun 2013 #70
i believe Kucinich led DU polls at times, and in 2008 i think Edwards JI7 Jun 2013 #71
Elizabeth Warren and Alan Grayson n/t Triana Jun 2013 #49
I'd wager dollars to doughnuts that neither Hillary nor Liz runs. longship Jun 2013 #50
Waiting to see how 2014 plays out politicasista Jun 2013 #52
I voted for Dean MelungeonWoman Jun 2013 #53
Joe Biden 2016!!!! Lady Freedom Returns Jun 2013 #55
So at this moment 45 of you... Agschmid Jun 2013 #56
They're all One Percenters. OilemFirchen Jun 2013 #58
Elizabeth Warren duuser5822 Jun 2013 #59
What, no Rand Paul? tarheelsunc Jun 2013 #63
I'm surprised no one has tossed out the name... Tx4obama Jun 2013 #67
How many of these polls are we going to have until the actual election season starts? Beacool Jun 2013 #68
Hillary is so warm, strong, brilliant, applegrove Jun 2013 #78
Barrack Hussein Obama chknltl Jun 2013 #81
Senator Patty Murray (Wa) nt chknltl Jun 2013 #82
"Too Early" is a prayer that someone quickly emerges. Loudly Jun 2013 #83
After listening to all the debate about Obama LostOne4Ever Jun 2013 #84
Don't know. The nominee will once again probably be someone I'll have to hold my nose while voting hobbit709 Jun 2013 #87
I don't trust Hillary, B Calm Jun 2013 #88
 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
26. And what, specifically, is wrong with him? Ignoring the 25 year long smear campaign, what has he
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 08:34 PM
Jun 2013

ever said or done that is just too wrong to get your support?

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
30. He's just not presidential material. He doesn't have a chance of ever winning that nomination.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 08:39 PM
Jun 2013

Better to select someone who has a chance.

Google stats on past presidents, and you'll get a picture of the kind of people who win that office. Plus, he's not popular among the general population.

Just because someone is a good flag bearer for a few issues doesn't make him good presidential material. So much else is involved in that.

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
35. I don't disagree that Americans are profoundly ignorant and shallow, I was
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 08:48 PM
Jun 2013

just curious if there was anything substantial behind your wish.

What if his wife ran?

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
66. Is this supposed to make a point? An answer? He's not good looking? He wants to make a nice paycheck
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 02:41 AM
Jun 2013

for a change?

That he's just about the only politician that went to DC, was reelected 8 times and didn't get rich in the process? Is that what you admire? Is that what you require to earn respect?

bluedigger

(17,077 posts)
69. He's a contributor to Fox News.
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 02:42 AM
Jun 2013

I guess he found a way to make his coin, didn't he? I can't respect that.

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
74. You don't think there's difference between doing it while in office and after?
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 03:08 AM
Jun 2013

It's OK for a thoroughly corrupt pig like Feinstein to steal somewhere in the neighborhood of $100,000,000 dollars while in office, but Dennis K. is not allowed to earn a paycheck that he needs after leaving because he didn't steal while serving?

How very Democratic of you.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
65. You mean, aside from the UFOs? Okay, for one I -did- support him early in the '08 primary process
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 02:35 AM
Jun 2013

At least after it became clear Al Gore wasnt gettng in.

But I happen to think dedicated progressives could do better. Hell, Al Sharpton, to my mind, made for a far more compelling candidate. He kicked ass at every debate he was on.

But I dont buy that Kucinich is some lone voice in the wilderness. While I originally thought the guy was a blow-dried Marina yuppie, I think someone like Gavin Newsom would be good as a rising voice in the party.

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
73. You think that a known fraud, a notorious and completely transparent con-man that created
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 03:00 AM
Jun 2013

his celebrity by piggy-backing on a media circus surrounding a proven fraud and continuing to back it up long after it was proven to be an outright lie, is better than Dennis Kucinich?

Really?

Have you ever bothered to learn about the UFO? No, of course not. Your reply is evidence of that. He saw an object flying that he could not explain. He did not declare it aliens or spirits or anything at all. All the "controversy" was wholly manufactured, first by a celebrity trying to sell her book, and then by the right wing media smear machine.

I've seen flying objects that I could not explain, and so have millions of other people. I don't believe they were anything except something I cannot explain.

If you're going to criticize him, at least pick on his "change of heart" regarding abortion.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
75. there's that, too.
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 03:21 AM
Jun 2013

Anyway, I don't think Kooch can ever be more than a footnote. I just don't think he's the leader we could use.

As for Sharpton, like I said- at least he provided some of the best lines in those debates.

I think we need new leaders, though.

zeeland

(247 posts)
60. While it's a sad commentary on US
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 10:25 PM
Jun 2013

politics, I doubt we will ever have another president that
fails to meet a standard of attractiveness set by the public.
Our greatest Presidents wouldn't be.

 

blkmusclmachine

(16,149 posts)
5. After Clinton/Obama, NO MORE DINOS, DLC, Third Way, Blue Dogs, or "New" Democrats.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 07:41 PM
Jun 2013
Send those wanna-be Republicans back to the GOPee.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
7. If we can't knock them out of key leadership positions, it's time to form a third party
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 07:44 PM
Jun 2013

Call it the Progressive Democrats or whatever, and certainly make room for non-corporate owned Democratic politicians like Alan Grayson, Elizabeth Warren, and the dozen or two more who don't toe the DLC line.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
8. I would be surprised if it wasn't Hillary, but her campaign seemed to stumble badly last time
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 07:45 PM
Jun 2013

or maybe Obama just made a better pitch to the Wall Street folks, so in the media, he could do no wrong and Hillary could do no right.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
14. How about who you would vote for in the primary?
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 08:08 PM
Jun 2013

If you're like me, both those factors go into that calculation.

Ohio Joe

(21,655 posts)
16. Right now, my gut is telling me I want Biden...
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 08:14 PM
Jun 2013

I suspect I will change my mind at least twice by the time the actual primary gets here though I really like Warren but I don't think she would be given a shot by the party... For the moment though I will stick with Biden.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
18. I dont think he's going to run.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 08:16 PM
Jun 2013

To get my primary vote he'd also need to do a 180 on his previous stature as a mega apologist for the drug war. That RAVE act of his was a spectacularly bad piece of legislation.

Ohio Joe

(21,655 posts)
33. oh... I had forgotten about that... Yeah, that was not very good
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 08:44 PM
Jun 2013

I don't think it's enough to sway me at this time but it is something to keep in mind.

 

Egalitarian Thug

(12,448 posts)
28. Right, cause Senator Citibank is such a great champion of the "little people".
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 08:37 PM
Jun 2013

He takes the train to work, he's a regular Joe like me.

Warpy

(110,903 posts)
10. I wish Brian Schweitzer wanted the job
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 07:48 PM
Jun 2013

but he's far too intelligent.

Howard Dean has made some noises about pursuing it, so I suppose I'll be a Deaniac.

It's too soon for Warren and she'd be fought tooth and nail the way Jimmy Carter was and by both parties.

Clinton is just too conservative. I didn't support her in the 2008 primary and I won't support her now, if she even runs.

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
12. I would vote for anyone who is the democratic candidate for President, however.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 07:55 PM
Jun 2013

HIllary is going to be the candidate and shall win the biggest landslide ever.

Unlike others, I am not going to put any of the candidates down for their politics, as it is a useless, and a very divisive thing to do.

If Hillary don't run, there are a lot of other candidates who would

IMHO a woman will be the next President, a democratic woman.

Now, if Hillary doesn't run, I would add Janet Napolitano, Kathleen Sebelius, Kirsten Gillibrand, Cory Booker(when he wins the senate primary in NJ), Deval Patrick and one is forgetting Michelle Obama, though 2024 is more likely and Joe Biden himself.

Unlike others who toss all these things out against President Obama and Hillary, people forget that one is going to need their major supporters to win the nomination. And we need to look at 270 and more.

There is not going to be an unknown running for the republicans.
And history shows us things and try as the people who don't like the President can, they will NOT make the President dis-honest
(though some are trying hard.)

People don't seem to realize that the Obama and Hillary supporters time and again have seen all the smears and put downs
and people will not change that opinion. In fact, the more crap that is thrown at them, the more the votes are already locked in.

Add Joe Biden to the mix, and he takes away the space for anyone else and Joe can and may just be the VP for Hillary, at least for the first term(there is good logic to not have someone ultra eager to be President), and Edwards comes to mind about the exact wrong type of VP.

Maybe Hillary will pick Howard Dean.

I personally would like the people in the senate to remain in the senate (both Warren and Booker).
Hard enough to win seats at this very point in time (other years were different).

I don't expect most of the people on the above list or on the ones I said to run if Hillary runs.

Some will run for VP.

The object is to get to 270 easily. I think Hillary will win 500.

If someone shows me exactly which and how many states others can win, I will listen, and I will 100% vote for whomever is the pick.
I just know whomever it is better win the general.

And as I have said, we might just be going against Jeb Bush/Rand Paul and Rand would NOT refuse the offer.
(especially as I think the odds are good he cannot win reelection to his senate seat and won't try at all.)


my vote though is for Hillary above. 6/21/2013 as Michelle and the President himself are not running.

Proud Public Servant

(2,097 posts)
64. So you see Hilary
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 11:06 PM
Jun 2013

Picking up all but four or five deep red states? Everything except, say, Mississippi, Alabama, South Carolina, Oklahoma, and Utah? Everything else?

What color is the sky in your world?

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
72. Oklahoma is ripe for the picking.
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 02:59 AM
Jun 2013

Many great democratic people in Oklahoma

Why look at the tornado and climate change.

And while the leaders of Oklahoma are draconian, not all the people living there are.

Maybe some now wonder how the senator there doesn't believe in climate change.

But of course, if one keeps saying they can't, well, that little engine never would have gotten up that hill would it?

Proud Public Servant

(2,097 posts)
90. That would be the same Oklahoma
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 08:36 AM
Jun 2013

Where every single county went for Romney in 2012? Seriously, every single one. THAT'S your idea of "ripe for the picking"? Okey-dokey.

 

graham4anything

(11,464 posts)
91. A woman might get a different vote & women make up 52%, don't they?
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 08:40 AM
Jun 2013

It is total cume, not individual districts.
If the voters come out to vote

It's the decade now of the women, and I think it is a whole new ballgame.

TheKentuckian

(24,943 posts)
17. Sherrod Brown tends to make the most overall sense to me.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 08:15 PM
Jun 2013

Nobody is perfect but I think he is a serious guy from a big swing state that has a pretty damn solid track record at high levels spending solid time in the House before coming to the Senate where he has actually been a real Senator not a stepping stone position.

May not have an interest in the world in running but I say a way above average option.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
85. I voted "Other" thinking primarily of Sherrod Brown
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 06:15 AM
Jun 2013

...although Sheldon Whitehouse also interests me.

DURHAM D

(32,595 posts)
25. I don't care as long as it is an all female ticket.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 08:33 PM
Jun 2013

By that I mean a female for President and female for Vice-President.

Hillary, Elizabeth or Kirstin Gillibrand at the top and Kamala Harris for V-P.

Democrats will have to really shake things up to have any chance and we have a very very shallow bench compared to the Republicans.

If we don't run two women Paul will win. Period.

DURHAM D

(32,595 posts)
37. We have exactly one A-lister.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 08:49 PM
Jun 2013

The Republicans have a bunch they are in love with. Cruz, Rubio, Paul, Christie to name a few. They will all be running against the government; easy to do given that pretty much everyone is pissed for one reason or another. The Independents will decide this election and they will be voting against the establishment so the Dems need to change the optics on our establishment in order to have any chance.

Otherwise say goodbye to the White House for at least 8 years.

BlueStater

(7,596 posts)
39. Christie is the only serious candidate of that bunch.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 08:57 PM
Jun 2013

The other three you mentioned are clowns. Name recognition doesn't equal substance. If that was the case, Newt Gingrich would be president right now.

DURHAM D

(32,595 posts)
44. The vast majority of Americans do not vote on issues or substance.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 09:07 PM
Jun 2013

They vote on style and unfortunately in 2016 the style points will go to the candidate they think is the most pissed at Washington and will change the status quo.

Therefore the only chance the Democrats have is to find a whole new way to change the status quo and that is by running two women.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
79. Christie is discourteous and downright mean. He can't control his temper
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 03:33 AM
Jun 2013

and is very conceited. But he is a very dominant personality. I don't think he could win the women's vote. He is just too disgusting personality wise.

1-Old-Man

(2,667 posts)
34. My vote? Elizabeth Warren, but I know full well it will never happen
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 08:47 PM
Jun 2013

Its been a mighty long time since the Democratic Party picked a Democrat to Represent them. The last I recall was Jimmy Carter, but the landscape has been bleak ever since. Clinton and Obama held out a lot of hope, but in action they didn't or haven't proved to be much interested in the people who put them in Office.

longship

(40,416 posts)
41. Too fucking early!!! And it will NOT be Liz Warren.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 09:04 PM
Jun 2013

IMHO, the Democratic Party needs strong liberals in government, like Ted Kennedy, whose seat (do I have to remind people) Elizabeth Warren is filling.

If I thought she ran for Senate just to use it as a skipping stone to a fast White House candidacy, I would never have supported her in the first place.

Those blowing the Warren/2016 trumpet ought to think about that for a minute, or two, or more.

Or maybe they ought to realize that the USA has a presidential election every four years, but the USA, and only the USA has this apparently two year brutal partisan cage match presidential selection process.

Why in the Sam Fuck would any sane human being want to make it a fucking four year campaign?

Fuck all this 2016 talk.

And it is very likely I will not be supporting either Hillary or Elizabeth since it is very likely that neither will be running.

In the meantime, here at DU...
BLAH, BLAH, BLAH!!

Sheesh!

BlueStater

(7,596 posts)
46. Her running is just a pipe dream around here.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 09:10 PM
Jun 2013

She won't. And considering I think she would make a bad GE candidate, I'm happy about this. She barely won her senate seat in a blue state so that hardly indicates to me she would have national appeal.

Jamaal510

(10,893 posts)
43. It's amazing how DU's 2016 Dem poll have Warren leading,
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 09:05 PM
Jun 2013

yet all the ones that they show on TV and elsewhere have Hillary leading by a long shot instead. I'm not sure who to believe.

DURHAM D

(32,595 posts)
47. I doubt if Senator Warren has 40% name recognition.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 09:11 PM
Jun 2013

She will need to do a lot more national press.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
57. The national polls which do not sample a
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 09:58 PM
Jun 2013

Largely progressive majority here on DU.

That's who I'd trust!

Beacool

(30,244 posts)
70. Believe elsewhere, DU is not the real world.
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 02:48 AM
Jun 2013

It's the equivalent of the Freepers, but on the Left. Over there they think that Sarah Palin and the rest of the Baggers have a chance at being president, the nuttier the better. They consider Jeb and Christie as too moderate. They are also hating on Rubio because of immigration reform.

JI7

(89,173 posts)
71. i believe Kucinich led DU polls at times, and in 2008 i think Edwards
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 02:57 AM
Jun 2013

had more support than Clinton and Obama.

longship

(40,416 posts)
50. I'd wager dollars to doughnuts that neither Hillary nor Liz runs.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 09:21 PM
Jun 2013

Hillary because she wants to retire.

Elizabeth because she just won her first Senate seat and I think that she has more ethics than ambition. If I am wrong than I am sorry that I ever supported her. I guess many here don't see it that way, or maybe don't see anything at all.

Regardless, see my post above about the utter silliness of this 2016 bullshit.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
56. So at this moment 45 of you...
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 09:56 PM
Jun 2013

have lost touch with reality. If we want to win Warren is not the right pick, although she handily beat Scott Brown a national election is something completely different.

My vote is it is way to early to call.

OilemFirchen

(7,143 posts)
58. They're all One Percenters.
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 10:03 PM
Jun 2013

So I'll spend election day pissing and moaning, then a few days after the election start gloating.

Maybe during the primary I'll start seeding an iggy list.

tarheelsunc

(2,117 posts)
63. What, no Rand Paul?
Fri Jun 21, 2013, 10:37 PM
Jun 2013

Come on, I'm sure if he was an option he'd have at least 5-10 votes now. Kind of sad that I actually believe that DUers would vote for him, but it certainly seems that way sometimes.

Now, if the poll was 100% anonymous, there's absolutely no telling...

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
67. I'm surprised no one has tossed out the name...
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 02:42 AM
Jun 2013

''SNOWDEN''... since he seems to be the new hero of the week



applegrove

(118,014 posts)
78. Hillary is so warm, strong, brilliant,
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 03:31 AM
Jun 2013

compassionate and perceptive. The world would do well to have her as President. But I still think Obama has some fight left in him so I'll concentrate my hopes in him.

chknltl

(10,558 posts)
81. Barrack Hussein Obama
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 03:38 AM
Jun 2013

(Somewhere across this great land....
in some parents basement....
a lurking freeper's melon...
.... just went all Galagher)

LostOne4Ever

(9,267 posts)
84. After listening to all the debate about Obama
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 05:25 AM
Jun 2013

and how we shouldn't have to vote for the lesser of two evils I have decided to vote for

Cthulhu. No more lesser of two evils for me!

?w=660

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
87. Don't know. The nominee will once again probably be someone I'll have to hold my nose while voting
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 07:36 AM
Jun 2013

Just like in 90% of the elections since 1972.

 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
88. I don't trust Hillary,
Sat Jun 22, 2013, 07:36 AM
Jun 2013

but I think she would win. I like Warren and she would make a great president!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Who is your pick for 2016