General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFacebook's chief security officer has been working for the NSA harvesting data for over 2 years
Webs Reach Binds N.S.A. and Silicon Valley Leaders
By JAMES RISEN and NICK WINGFIELD
Published: June 19, 2013
WASHINGTON When Max Kelly, the chief security officer for Facebook, left the social media company in 2010, he did not go to Google, Twitter or a similar Silicon Valley concern. Instead the man who was responsible for protecting the personal information of Facebooks more than one billion users from outside attacks went to work for another giant institution that manages and analyzes large pools of data: the National Security Agency.
Mr. Kellys move to the spy agency, which has not previously been reported, underscores the increasingly deep connections between Silicon Valley and the agency and the degree to which they are now in the same business. Both hunt for ways to collect, analyze and exploit large pools of data about millions of Americans.
The only difference is that the N.S.A. does it for intelligence, and Silicon Valley does it to make money.
...
Silicon Valley has what the spy agency wants: vast amounts of private data and the most sophisticated software available to analyze it. The agency in turn is one of Silicon Valleys largest customers for what is known as data analytics, one of the valleys fastest-growing markets. To get their hands on the latest software technology to manipulate and take advantage of large volumes of data, United States intelligence agencies invest in Silicon Valley start-ups, award classified contracts and recruit technology experts like Mr. Kelly.
...
More here: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/20/technology/silicon-valley-and-spy-agency-bound-by-strengthening-web.html?pagewanted=all&_r=3&
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)It's at the tip of my tongue...it's starts with an F.
This duck quacks
malaise
(268,950 posts)Seriously - nothing is private
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)WillyT
(72,631 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Going down that list is scary.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)zeemike
(18,998 posts)But still people will call you a CTer or a hair on fire pearl clutcher if you call it that...they own that word and you can't use it
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)We have to think of a new name for it, because we can never ever be
saying the same thing Alex Jones is saying and be politically correct.
Alex Jones thinks the world is round, so I'm sure it must be flat.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)The dichotomy.....you are ether with him or us...
ReRe
(10,597 posts)To you youngsters out there: This is NOT a joke. This is the full definition of Fascism. And WillyT, thank you so much for posting this. You need to post this every day in all threads and you might leave off the last line in red, or change it to "1947-Present," or "1963-Present."
Rex
(65,616 posts)but I wonder if that is code for something else now. They all work together, I joked years ago calling it CIA-Facebook.
malaise
(268,950 posts)internet
Rex
(65,616 posts)When they called it a BBS.
malaise
(268,950 posts)for people's basic security than we every imagined - they have access to credit cards, etc. so that while there is the anger/fear of the invasion of privacy, having these private sector goons having access is way more frightening to me.
National security cannot be in the hands of private contractors
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)handed over to these Private Security Corporations is outsourced to other countries. It makes a mockery of the lies they've been telling us about 'protecting our security'.
In the end, it's most likely all about money. Selling data, buying data, all in the name of Security and Terror.
And that is probably why they are freaking out, the whole scam is likely to come toppling down once the people learn what they are really up to.
As Ron Wyden said 'if the people knew how they are using the law, they would be outraged'. Well, let's find out, even though it probably is already too late.
Clapper, Republican, a perfect example of the Corporate involvement in all of this. Former CEO of Booz Allen, now Director of Intelligence. How did THAT happen in a Democratic Administration?
malaise
(268,950 posts)National interest always meant the interests of the corporations - now they're looting government with impunity.
George Bush and Cheney really fugged up this planet - and it will take hard work to undo this madness.
Blackwater was their first big mercenary experiment - shakes head.
9/11 was way too convenient.
dkf
(37,305 posts)How well do hackers vet? Not that I really care. I'm more interested in disassembling it all.
malaise
(268,950 posts)and it is scary. Hackers vet???? We can dream. Disassembling it all is the only way to go but that is not going to happen.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)and the stupid idea of copying Wall Street in buying the lowest bidder, outsourcing and basically making everything else suck for the rest of us. They should be embarrassed about that. They however just looked the other way, ie, corporate mercenaries - so I don't expect the feds to give a shit. Just like when the Pentagon investigates something inhouse. You already know the verdict. This govt has a fetish with money. Seems sometimes they don't give a shit about anything else. Or seem to remember we deserve the right to be protected FROM corporations. Not work hand and hand with them.
How can you trust THEIR allegiance? Microsoft? LOL.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)NATIONAL SECURITY.
Because National Security = Corporate Security of the USA.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)Pulllleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeease! (like Roger Rabbit would say it)
Pretty please?
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)Jarla
(156 posts)malaise
(268,950 posts)Catherina
(35,568 posts)Facebook is at 1:50
-
word, sit back, listen you rocking with Zuckerberg, fuckin nerd tactician
-
So PRISM?
-
whats that, PRISM? Never even heard of that system
yeah we got a program running, but we call it FASCISM
-
Do your users like that?
-
a billion likes, cousin,
and if you dislike something, heres my dislike button,
Im in charge you fuckin turds, interviews over, finished, ended
These are the low lives handling our personal information.
Mark Zuckerberg admits in a New Yorker profile that he mocked early Facebook users for trusting him with their personal information. A youthful indiscretion, the Facebook founder says he's much more mature now, at the ripe age of 26.
"They trust me dumb fucks," says Zuckerberg in one of the instant messages, first published by former Valleywag Nicholas Carlson at Silicon Alley Insider, and now confirmed by Zuckerberg himself in Jose Antonio Vargas's New Yorker piece. Zuckerberg now tells Vargas, "I think I've grown and learned a lot" since those instant messages.
And yet the old quote resounds precisely because Facebook continues to stir up privacy controversies at regular intervals. Zuckerberg justifies his privacy rollbacks by saying the social norms have changed in favor of transparency, but, as tech executive Anil Dash tells the New Yorker, that sort of change is much more appealing for a privileged, Ivy Leaguer golden boy of Silicon Valley like Zuckerberg than for his half a billion users, many of whom work for less tolerant bosses and socialize in more judgmental circles.
...
http://gawker.com/482448579
Jarla
(156 posts)truedelphi
(32,324 posts)Fourth Reich!
If the Onion can't do it, no one can.
Jarla
(156 posts)Both are quite funny.
Sorry, I don't think I'm allowed to embed videos.
Catherina
(35,568 posts)I have so much security on my computer that it didn't even show there was a video there. I just went and watched. How funny lol but so sad at the same time.
PS, it's not you. You can't embed that format, only the big ones like youtube, vimeo. dailymotion etc
Your video is too funny lol! Thanks Jarla
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... I can see Justin Timberlake playing Snowden in a whistle costume, maybe standing in front of a White House backdrop and SNL's Mr Pharoh (black dude who looks vaguely similar to PO). Thanks, Catherina!
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)questionable 'alliance'. He was a former CEO of Booz Allen, multi-billion dollar Security Corporation. He sailed from that job right into the government and is now the Director of Intelligence. I'm sure that all that he knows now would never be used by him, to say, influence Congress to provide more funding for his former (and probably future) Corporation. All of it stinks, and anyone who is denying it is either part of it and profiting from it, or just plain willfully blind.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)Hell, Facebook might be an NSA program.
Damn, I thought twice about posting that.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)I decided it wasn't worth the risk of having your personal info out there. No other forum I joined around that time, asked for your real name, date of birth, address, etc. It just felt creepy.
I know they can find you anyhow, but why make it that easy for them. And when I got to know Zucerman, I didn't like him at all.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)ALL data on the internet is public and accessible.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Lol, yes, I think when I post on a public forum no one can see it!
No, I but I think that what I say privately on the phone and in email which SHOULD be private, is not private either. And THAT is a problem, unless you have no problem living in a surveilance state, like East Germany eg, which I do.
VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)Almost everything I've given them is made up - everything but my name. But now they're asking me every time I sign in where I went to High School, where I work, etc. I never filled out that info and they really do want it.
It's a giant data vacuum and sadly it doesn't surprise me to learn it has deep government connections.
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
(2,022 posts)Facebook, google, et all, are just enhanced ways of harvesting... but it is all obviously dependent on the www... I double edged sword, for sure.
Coccydynia
(198 posts)Old news. Why the outrage? Why the Obama hate?
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)desperation and where it is coming from.
It won't silence anyone, so the goal won't be achieved. In fact the more desperate they become to silence people, the more determined people are to speak out.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)I hate manipulators and bullies....and can't resist defying them.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Certainly, considering the sources and the obvious goal, it doesn't effect me in the least or anyone else that I know of.
Skip Intro
(19,768 posts)Coccydynia
(198 posts)And I can read DU without being a member.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)I expect not
I thought facebook would be looking out for terrorists. How about Twitter?
Matariki
(18,775 posts)your subject line makes it sound like those roles are concurrent.
PufPuf23
(8,768 posts)Catherina
(35,568 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Corporate bigwigs like to make money. Not waste time working for the government for free.
JI7
(89,247 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Buncha guys talking about Wall Street greed = National Security at risk.
RC
(25,592 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)They spent BILLIONS to get Americans to believe they can't have what they want because they are outnumbered by a tiny minority of right wingers.
Iwillnevergiveup
(9,298 posts)NOT being on Facebook. After all is said and done, e-mailing, phoning, and in-person get togethers still work. Easy as switching from a mega bank to a credit union.