Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 12:01 AM Jun 2013

Scalia: No Right to 'Homosexual Conduct' or Abortion in Constitution

Source: The Advocate

Addressing the North Carolina Bar Association in Asheville Friday, Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia said — unsurprisingly — that judges are in error when they find rights to “homosexual conduct” or abortion in the Constitution.

In his speech, titled “Mullahs of the West: Judges as Moral Arbiters,” the ultraconservative Scalia said he believes in interpreting the Constitution as it would have been when it was adopted, the Asheville Citizen-Times reports. At that time, he said, abortion, assisted suicide, and homosexual acts “were criminal throughout the United States and remained so for several centuries.”

Read more: http://www.advocate.com/society/law/2013/06/22/scalia-no-right-homosexual-conduct-constitution

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Scalia: No Right to 'Homosexual Conduct' or Abortion in Constitution (Original Post) Newsjock Jun 2013 OP
I thought he was a fan of the Ninth Amendment. rug Jun 2013 #1
I had some originalist law professors when I was in school. former9thward Jun 2013 #10
Thanks for a concise decription of his festered mind. rug Jun 2013 #11
Scalia said he believes in interpreting the Constitution as it would have been when it was adopted JaneyVee Jun 2013 #2
We only have three rights. dawg Jun 2013 #3
Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. Fu*k you scalia still_one Jun 2013 #4
there is no right to heterosexual conduct in there either is there? nt msongs Jun 2013 #5
+1 Lex Jun 2013 #7
No, there isn't. Scalia is a disgrace to this country. sabrina 1 Jun 2013 #15
Only the missionary position. All that other stuff is for pre-verts, fornicators, and abominators. Hekate Jun 2013 #22
Fuck Scalia. Oh, wait... uppityperson Jun 2013 #6
The Constitution doesn't guarantee the right to be an asshole. HooptieWagon Jun 2013 #8
"the right to be let alone" - Justice Brandeis, 1928 Lex Jun 2013 #9
I like that one. eShirl Jun 2013 #20
So, only white male landowners would have the right to vote? ismnotwasm Jun 2013 #12
Nope, and he represents a growing of regressives in the USA. We stand as one or end up on our knees. freshwest Jun 2013 #18
Homosexuality is one issue where Scalia froths at the mouth so much Ms. Toad Jun 2013 #13
However, selling human beings was NOT illegal when the Constitution was adopted jmowreader Jun 2013 #14
That's why I won't 'Stand with Rand.' Same shit, different demagogue. freshwest Jun 2013 #17
So does that mean there's no right to own types of guns not invented yet? rebecca_herman Jun 2013 #16
Scalia still wants to outlaw masturbation, which probably explains his popularity with the people. Warren DeMontague Jun 2013 #19
The man is no genius. magellan Jun 2013 #21
He's a fricken troll. sibelian Jun 2013 #23

former9thward

(31,986 posts)
10. I had some originalist law professors when I was in school.
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 12:26 AM
Jun 2013

What they say is that states and the federal government can legalize gay sex, abortion, etc. but if those laws do not exist then the right to those things can't be found in the Constitution itself. That is because those activities were illegal at the time the Constitution was written and remained so for a long time afterwards. So the ninth amendment and the tenth allow for legalization of these things if the states so desire. It will be interesting to see how this plays out in the DAMA decision which should come quickly.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
2. Scalia said he believes in interpreting the Constitution as it would have been when it was adopted
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 12:09 AM
Jun 2013

Now THAT'S a racist.

dawg

(10,624 posts)
3. We only have three rights.
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 12:10 AM
Jun 2013

Free Speech

Food Money

Not to be Killed (Unless it's done by a Policeman)

Hekate

(90,657 posts)
22. Only the missionary position. All that other stuff is for pre-verts, fornicators, and abominators.
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 05:31 AM
Jun 2013

And indeed, heterosexual sex acts of many kinds were formerly outlawed in quite a few states, though how the Peeping Toms and sheet-sniffers found out about what went on in bedrooms not their own is as disgusting to contemplate as is their continuing obsession to this very day with LGBT sexual conduct, contraception, and abortion.

Scalia is a toad, and like his brethren he has a dirty mind.

Lex

(34,108 posts)
9. "the right to be let alone" - Justice Brandeis, 1928
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 12:25 AM
Jun 2013

" . . . the right to be left alone -- the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men."


freshwest

(53,661 posts)
18. Nope, and he represents a growing of regressives in the USA. We stand as one or end up on our knees.
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 03:39 AM
Jun 2013
There is no option, yet some people feel we have the luxury of not standing together.

Ms. Toad

(34,066 posts)
13. Homosexuality is one issue where Scalia froths at the mouth so much
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 12:35 AM
Jun 2013

that it wouldn't matter how he interpreted the constitution.

On most issues, even though I would decide nearly every case the opposite way he does, his logic is impeccable. That came as a complete surprise when I started reading the opinions, not just the decisions.

On homosexuality his opinions read like someone completely incapable of putting two sentences together.

I haven't paid much attention to his opinions on abortion.

jmowreader

(50,556 posts)
14. However, selling human beings was NOT illegal when the Constitution was adopted
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 12:36 AM
Jun 2013

Some other things that were illegal when the Constitution was adopted:

women voting
people who didn't own land voting
the common people voting for their own United States senators
the president and vice-president running on a common ticket
not turning over runaway slaves on the demand of their owners

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
17. That's why I won't 'Stand with Rand.' Same shit, different demagogue.
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 03:36 AM
Jun 2013
I don't care about his other wonderful ideas. He's against me and mine. That's enough.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
19. Scalia still wants to outlaw masturbation, which probably explains his popularity with the people.
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 04:30 AM
Jun 2013

And which makes the "Masturbating Fetuses" anti-choice argument the GOP has taken up lately, even weirder.

magellan

(13,257 posts)
21. The man is no genius.
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 04:40 AM
Jun 2013
the ultraconservative Scalia said he believes in interpreting the Constitution as it would have been when it was adopted, the Asheville Citizen-Times reports. At that time, he said, abortion, assisted suicide, and homosexual acts “were criminal throughout the United States and remained so for several centuries.


226 years equals "several centuries"?
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Scalia: No Right to 'Homo...