General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsScalia: No Right to 'Homosexual Conduct' or Abortion in Constitution
Source: The Advocate
Addressing the North Carolina Bar Association in Asheville Friday, Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia said unsurprisingly that judges are in error when they find rights to homosexual conduct or abortion in the Constitution.
In his speech, titled Mullahs of the West: Judges as Moral Arbiters, the ultraconservative Scalia said he believes in interpreting the Constitution as it would have been when it was adopted, the Asheville Citizen-Times reports. At that time, he said, abortion, assisted suicide, and homosexual acts were criminal throughout the United States and remained so for several centuries.
Read more: http://www.advocate.com/society/law/2013/06/22/scalia-no-right-homosexual-conduct-constitution
rug
(82,333 posts)former9thward
(31,986 posts)What they say is that states and the federal government can legalize gay sex, abortion, etc. but if those laws do not exist then the right to those things can't be found in the Constitution itself. That is because those activities were illegal at the time the Constitution was written and remained so for a long time afterwards. So the ninth amendment and the tenth allow for legalization of these things if the states so desire. It will be interesting to see how this plays out in the DAMA decision which should come quickly.
rug
(82,333 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Now THAT'S a racist.
dawg
(10,624 posts)Free Speech
Food Money
Not to be Killed (Unless it's done by a Policeman)
still_one
(92,174 posts)msongs
(67,395 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Hekate
(90,657 posts)And indeed, heterosexual sex acts of many kinds were formerly outlawed in quite a few states, though how the Peeping Toms and sheet-sniffers found out about what went on in bedrooms not their own is as disgusting to contemplate as is their continuing obsession to this very day with LGBT sexual conduct, contraception, and abortion.
Scalia is a toad, and like his brethren he has a dirty mind.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)ok, as a female, still, ewwwwwwww. To hell with him.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)I guess Scalia is shit out of luck.
Lex
(34,108 posts)" . . . the right to be left alone -- the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men."
eShirl
(18,490 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)Is he out of his mind?
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Ms. Toad
(34,066 posts)that it wouldn't matter how he interpreted the constitution.
On most issues, even though I would decide nearly every case the opposite way he does, his logic is impeccable. That came as a complete surprise when I started reading the opinions, not just the decisions.
On homosexuality his opinions read like someone completely incapable of putting two sentences together.
I haven't paid much attention to his opinions on abortion.
jmowreader
(50,556 posts)Some other things that were illegal when the Constitution was adopted:
women voting
people who didn't own land voting
the common people voting for their own United States senators
the president and vice-president running on a common ticket
not turning over runaway slaves on the demand of their owners
freshwest
(53,661 posts)rebecca_herman
(617 posts)hmmmmmmmmmmm?
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)And which makes the "Masturbating Fetuses" anti-choice argument the GOP has taken up lately, even weirder.
magellan
(13,257 posts)226 years equals "several centuries"?