Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKRUGMAN: The Fed May Have Just Made A Historic Mistake, And Done More Damage Than It Realizes
http://www.businessinsider.com/krugman-on-the-taper-2013-6The most important story in the world is the change of direction in U.S. interest rates, which coincides with the change in tone out of the Federal Reserve. On Wednesday the Fed indicated that so long as its economic projections come to pass, it plans to slow down on Quantitative Easing later this year, with an eye towards totally ceasing bond purchases sometime in 2014.
The markets puked on the news, and interest rates shot up, a move that was exacerbated by Bernanke himself saying he was not worried about the rise in rates.
According to Paul Krugman, it's possible this will end up as a "historic" mistake.
If the economy recovers, then fine, whatever, the Fed will get away with it.
A Potentially Tragic Taper
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/20/a-potentially-tragic-taper/?_r=0
I will be traveling today, so limited blogging (and yes, Im still in Yurp, so today is Thursday). But I did want to weigh in briefly on the Feds latest, in which Bernanke confirmed that the Fed is getting significantly more hawkish based on relatively optimistic forecasts.
My reaction is, this is not good. They might get away with it, but theres also a serious chance that this will end up looking like a historic mistake.
Bear in mind, first, that the US economy is still deep in the hole, which is especially obvious if you look at employment rather than unemployment:
Aging of the population accounts for some but not much of the fall in the employment ratio; the fact is that we are still a very long way from acceptable employment levels. Meanwhile, inflation remains below the Feds target. Maybe the Fed believes that the situation will improve but as everyone points out, the Fed has been consistently over-optimistic since the crisis began. And for now the economy still needs all the help it can get.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1406 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (20)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
KRUGMAN: The Fed May Have Just Made A Historic Mistake, And Done More Damage Than It Realizes (Original Post)
xchrom
Jun 2013
OP
He is oblivious to the "fact" the economy is completely recovered...did I get that right?
Safetykitten
Jun 2013
#4
chervilant
(8,267 posts)1. When Krugman speaks,
people should listen -- particularly Bernanke and his ilk. (If this is a recovery, I'm pink with chartreuse polka dots...)
rurallib
(62,406 posts)2. sure be nice if our 'liberal' president would listen
to at least one liberal economist.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)3. I think it was a move to subdue the markets a bit.
The Fed is not going to be able to stop QE, actually. Our debt has become so large that interest payments on it will become unsustainable rather quickly if interest rate rise too much.
QE is here to stay and I expect may actually increase under the current currency war.
Safetykitten
(5,162 posts)4. He is oblivious to the "fact" the economy is completely recovered...did I get that right?
Everyone knows it. Why can't he accept that?