Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cooley Hurd

(26,877 posts)
Sun Jun 23, 2013, 07:03 PM Jun 2013

In 1992, the verdict of Internment was in:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_American_internment#Legal_legacy

Former Supreme Court Justice Tom C. Clark, who represented the US Department of Justice in the "relocation," writes in the epilogue to the 1992 book Executive Order 9066: The Internment of 110,000 Japanese Americans:


The truth is—as this deplorable experience proves—that constitutions and laws are not sufficient of themselves...Despite the unequivocal language of the Constitution of the United States that the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, and despite the Fifth Amendment's command that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law, both of these constitutional safeguards were denied by military action under Executive Order 9066.


No stretch to apply this to Edward Snowden.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In 1992, the verdict of Internment was in: (Original Post) Cooley Hurd Jun 2013 OP
No stretch to apply it to anybody. Downwinder Jun 2013 #1
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In 1992, the verdict of I...