Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 05:21 PM Jun 2013

Glenn Greenwald pushes back hard on latest Edward Snowden “revelations”

Glenn Greenwald pushes back hard on latest Edward Snowden “revelations”

But Greenwald told me that when Snowden had initially contacted him, Snowden hadn’t even shared his name or where he worked — he’d simply said he had explosive documents that Greenwald (whose reporting on leak investigations and civil liberties abuses was already widely known) would want to see. At that stage, Greenwald said, their conversations only concerned how to set up an encryption system that Snowden wanted in order to facilitate private communication of documents with him. The system was not set up until several months later, Greenwald said.

It was only in May — and not before — that Snowden told him who he was, who he worked for (at that point he identified himself as affiliated with the NSA) and what sort of documents he had to share, Greenwald says. It wasn’t until June — when Greenwald visited Snowden in Hong Kong — that Snowden told him he worked specifically for Booz Allen, Greenwald adds.

“We had early conversations about setting up encryption, so we worked early on to set that up,” Greenwald says. “We didn’t work on any documents. I didn’t even know Edward Snowden’s name or where he worked until after he was in Hong Kong with the documents. Anyone who is claiming that somehow I worked with him to get those documents or helped him is just lying.”


http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2013/06/24/glenn-greenwald-pushes-back-hard-on-latest-edward-snowden-revelations/
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Glenn Greenwald pushes back hard on latest Edward Snowden “revelations” (Original Post) Luminous Animal Jun 2013 OP
I bet Greenwald has more than a few boxes in his garage too! Vinnie From Indy Jun 2013 #1
Kick. Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #2
Liars are gonna lie when they get caught in a conspiracy. Greenwald has fucked himself. MjolnirTime Jun 2013 #3
Greenwald covers his ass would be a better header for that story BeyondGeography Jun 2013 #4
Think he's worried about the phone calls he made to Snowden and whoever else Whisp Jun 2013 #11
Since Greenwald is in Brazil a lot, NSA has all their communications. FarCenter Jun 2013 #5
Glennie the liar sounds a bit nervous, doesn't he? eom Whisp Jun 2013 #6
Go ahead and document the lies. I'll leave you some space just below my post for your reply. DisgustipatedinCA Jun 2013 #9
Amazing isn't it? Lie after lie told about Snowden and Greenwald. If these people are Christians... Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #17
kind of hard to believe: Control-Z Jun 2013 #7
Why? Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #16
Sounds like bullshit to me. GeorgeGist Jun 2013 #8
Translation: "Please don't arrest me for soliticting espionage!" jeff47 Jun 2013 #10
It gets more folded by the hour flamingdem Jun 2013 #12
Here's a link to Greenwald's tweet where he says he's worked with Snowden since February, below Tx4obama Jun 2013 #13
That might lead one to believe that Glenn knew Whisp Jun 2013 #14
So. He already has said, before today, that Snowden contact him in February.... Luminous Animal Jun 2013 #15
So Snowden contacted Greenwald BEFORE he took the job at BAH Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #18
now go back and read the first paragraph of the OP frylock Jun 2013 #20
This doesn't really pass the smell test. Denzil_DC Jun 2013 #19
what were "deep throat's" bona fides? frylock Jun 2013 #21
"All the President's Men" implies he was an "old friend and sometimes source" of Woodward's, Denzil_DC Jun 2013 #24
Or that could explain why it took so long usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #22
So if somebody wants to waste Glenn Greenwald's time, Denzil_DC Jun 2013 #23
Not really usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #25
"You would have to convince him you actually knew what you were talking about ... Denzil_DC Jun 2013 #27
Well, let's agree to disagree usGovOwesUs3Trillion Jun 2013 #29
Sure, that's a civilized way to conclude a discussion. Denzil_DC Jun 2013 #31
Glen gholtron Jun 2013 #26
K & R !!! WillyT Jun 2013 #28
No surprise Life Long Dem Jun 2013 #30
 

MjolnirTime

(1,800 posts)
3. Liars are gonna lie when they get caught in a conspiracy. Greenwald has fucked himself.
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 05:26 PM
Jun 2013

It's going to be fun watching him twist in the wind.

BeyondGeography

(39,369 posts)
4. Greenwald covers his ass would be a better header for that story
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 05:29 PM
Jun 2013

He (understandably) doesn't want to be seen as conspiring with someone who says he took a job just to steal info that he, Greenwald, would publish.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
11. Think he's worried about the phone calls he made to Snowden and whoever else
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 05:59 PM
Jun 2013

is involved?

After all, NSA can hear everything, everywhere! Isn't that what he claimed? I bet he didn't really believe it then, but he may believe it now.

sweaty Glenn.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
9. Go ahead and document the lies. I'll leave you some space just below my post for your reply.
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 05:43 PM
Jun 2013

We don't want to be seen as a bunch of wild-eyed people who make things up to suit our own agendas. Kindly provide the details to back your claim, and thank you for your attention to this important matter.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
17. Amazing isn't it? Lie after lie told about Snowden and Greenwald. If these people are Christians...
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 06:33 PM
Jun 2013

They are going to have some explaining to do at the pearly gates.

Control-Z

(15,682 posts)
7. kind of hard to believe:
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 05:34 PM
Jun 2013

"I didn’t even know Edward Snowden’s name or where he worked until after he was in Hong Kong with the documents."

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
10. Translation: "Please don't arrest me for soliticting espionage!"
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 05:50 PM
Jun 2013

If Glen had just been the passive recipient of information, he'd be fine, legally.

It's starting to look like that wasn't the case. We'll have to see how this unfolds.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
14. That might lead one to believe that Glenn knew
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 06:11 PM
Jun 2013

Snowden was getting the Booz job just so he could steal classifieds.

Hmmm, I bet Glenn knew.

Glenn thinks he's too smart for the world.

He will find out soon he's not that sharp afterall.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
15. So. He already has said, before today, that Snowden contact him in February....
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 06:25 PM
Jun 2013

That does not prove the Greenwald knew who he was or where he worked or what he had.

Denzil_DC

(7,232 posts)
19. This doesn't really pass the smell test.
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 06:48 PM
Jun 2013

Somebody contacts a busy and somewhat notorious/renowned blogger/journalist anonymously, claiming they have "explosive documents."

That journalist then invests time and resources in setting up an encryption system for later use. The claim appears to be that Greenwald did this without asking for any verification of the informant's bona fides, nor seemingly any information about the nature or origin of the "explosive documents."

Hmmm.

Denzil_DC

(7,232 posts)
24. "All the President's Men" implies he was an "old friend and sometimes source" of Woodward's,
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 08:53 PM
Jun 2013
Woodward called an old friend and sometimes source who worked for the federal government and did not like to be called at his office. His friend said hurriedly that the break-in case was going to "heat up," but he couldn't explain and hung up.

http://books.simonandschuster.ca/All-the-President%27s-Men/Carl-Bernstein/9780671894412/excerpt_with_id/17414
 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
22. Or that could explain why it took so long
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 07:55 PM
Jun 2013

Had he known exactly what he was getting into you would think that it would have been expedited.

Denzil_DC

(7,232 posts)
23. So if somebody wants to waste Glenn Greenwald's time,
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 08:47 PM
Jun 2013

all they have to do is contact him anonymously, tell him they have "explosive documents" he simply HAS to see, he won't mind if they won't tell him what those documents are or who they are, but he'll spend time corresponding and setting up encryption codes etc. anyway.

If that's the way he works, he'd be WIDE open to being played, either by a timewaster or an entrapper.

Also, I don't think it could have been expedited much because according to Greenwald, Snowden hadn't filled up his USB drives until May.

 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
25. Not really
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 09:01 PM
Jun 2013

You would have to convince him you actually knew what you were talking about, most people wouldn't even have a clue about PKI.

BTW: Reports are always dealing with kooks, or people out to get them, so they have some savvy, to say the least, when vetting a source... and these things take time.

but all that doesn't matter... what matters is that Snowden went to the press to report crimes being committed against the american people, not to mention the rest of the world, with documented evidence that can not be refuted.

To me, and many others, he is a modern day is Paul Revere with a thumb drive full of the news that Tyranny is coming!



Denzil_DC

(7,232 posts)
27. "You would have to convince him you actually knew what you were talking about ...
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 09:12 PM
Jun 2013

... most people wouldn't even have a clue about PKI."

Encryption keys are something anyone with just a little tech knowledge could gen up on in no time. Heck, via email, you could just copy and paste the information from any number of sites.

Further about convincing him that "you actually knew what you were talking about," Greenwald's claim is that the source was very cagey, and they initially ONLY discussed the encryption system they'd use. From the article in the OP:

At that stage [Greenwald's tweet says this was in February], Greenwald said, their conversations only concerned how to set up an encryption system that Snowden wanted in order to facilitate private communication of documents with him. The system was not set up until several months later, Greenwald said.

It was only in May — and not before — that Snowden told him who he was, who he worked for (at that point he identified himself as affiliated with the NSA) and what sort of documents he had to share,


How could Snowden convince Greenwald he knew what he was talking about if they didn't talk about it?
 

usGovOwesUs3Trillion

(2,022 posts)
29. Well, let's agree to disagree
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 09:20 PM
Jun 2013

besides, the story for me is not about the reporter and his source, it is about the suspicionless spying going on.

Denzil_DC

(7,232 posts)
31. Sure, that's a civilized way to conclude a discussion.
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 09:24 PM
Jun 2013

But as you'll see, my smell test still isn't satisfied.

gholtron

(376 posts)
26. Glen
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 09:10 PM
Jun 2013

You got some explaining to do. Ha Ha. I bet the next time he's on TV he'll be drawing maps on how to find Eddie.
Looks like David Gregory was trying to tell him something.

 

Life Long Dem

(8,582 posts)
30. No surprise
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 09:21 PM
Jun 2013
Glenn Greenwald ?@ggreenwald

@TheStalwart The reality is that Laura Poitras and I have been working with him since February, long before anyone spoke to Bart Gellman

https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/344040301972815872
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Glenn Greenwald pushes ba...