Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 05:46 PM Jun 2013

Congressional sources: IRS also targeted liberal groups with the "progressive" word.

Word 'progressives' among words used to screen organizations

WASHINGTON (CNN) - The IRS targeted liberal groups as well as conservatives for extra scrutiny of tax-exempt applications, using the word "progressives" among other liberal-sounding terms to screen for organizations engaged in political activity, multiple congressional sources told CNN on Monday.

The agency used multiple lists of inappropriate criteria in reviewing applications for tax-exempt status up until this month, the temporary head of the tax agency said Monday in his first report on the targeting of conservative groups.

IRS Principal Deputy Commissioner Daniel Werfel provided no details of what inappropriate criteria were on the lists, but said "there was a wide-ranging set of categories and cases that spanned a broad spectrum."

The practice of using so-called "Be On the Look Out" or BOLO criteria has been suspended in considering tax-exempt applications, Werfel told reporters in announcing his initial review of the agency he took over in May.

http://www.wcyb.com/news/politics/nairs-probe-finds-more-screening-lists/-/14590782/20695094/-/ngi318/-/index.html

This was on our local news site. I was surprised to read it.
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Congressional sources: IRS also targeted liberal groups with the "progressive" word. (Original Post) cynatnite Jun 2013 OP
kicking. n/t cynatnite Jun 2013 #1
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Congressional sources: IR...