General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe talking heads on TV are still getting one of the main points regarding meta-data wrong...
Guy on MSNBC just said: ... wouldn't it be better for (NSA or FBI or whoever) to just wait and go to the telecoms once they have a lead on who they need the data on instead of NSA storing five years of data.... (paraphrasing here)
The POINT is that the telecoms do NOT store meta-data for very long.
It has been said many times that most telecoms delete their older meta-data after 30 to 90 days.
So, IF the NSA doesn't store it in back-up databases there will be NO data.
IF a regulation were to be issued that made the telecoms to keep meta-data for five years then that cost would be passed onto the customers!
Why do folks keep missing this.
pkdu
(3,977 posts)Skittles
(153,141 posts)only because I do not believe anyone can be that naive
randome
(34,845 posts)After all this time, they still don't understand what metadata is. Incredible.
[hr]
[font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font]
[hr]
sagat
(241 posts)Arctic Dave
(13,812 posts)So we pay for it out our taxes that are out of control.
Derp derp derp.
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)Shouldn't our phone bills go down?
Benton D Struckcheon
(2,347 posts)I just did a quick Google and found they keep it for a year, allegedly.
This would make more sense. I'd think the current stuff is kept on a live database and the older stuff is backed up in a compressed format to be referred to if needed for older billing inquiries.
Keeping this data around would involve minimal cost actually. Most large companies have a department that handles data archiving, and if you need older stuff restored you can get it done by request.
Pholus
(4,062 posts)Mobile call detail records are stored between 1-7 years depending on the carrier.