General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMatt Taibbi's Blockbuster Cover Story Exposes Key Culprits in Financial Crash
http://www.alternet.org/economy/financial-ratings-agencies-were-complicit-2008-economic-crashAnyone who paid attention to the financial collapse of 2008 knows that the ratings agencies who are the arbiters of whether companies are a safe bet to take on debt played a big role. Less known are the exact details of how big a role they played. The Rolling Stones Matt Taibbi fills in the gaps in a blockbuster cover story.
Taibbis new piece, titled The Last Mystery of the Financial Crisis, shows in detail the role of the ratings agencies and how they rubber-stamped dubious bank transactions. The agencies Taibbi focuses on are the nations top two: S&P and Moodys, which control a good chunk of the ratings agency market. Ratings agencies define what is safe to put money in and what is not. Their ratings are vitally important to the financial industry. But instead of evaluating companies objectively and giving them the ratings they deserve, Moodys and S&P doled out top ratings to entities that were undeserving.
The new details Taibbi writes on come from documents and e-mails released as part of a lawsuit against the ratings agencies that alleged they conspired with Morgan Stanley to induce investment in subprime deals.
In April, the ratings agencies settled the lawsuit brought against them, with King County, Washington and the Abu Dhabi Commercial bank being the lead plaintiffs. The case centered on whats known as a structured investment vehicle, or SIV.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)Last edited Tue Jun 25, 2013, 08:43 AM - Edit history (1)
K&R
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-last-mystery-of-the-financial-crisis-20130619
*Edited: to kick
vt_native
(484 posts)Sorry, young people, look it up!
Like Michael Hastings' car did. Dangerous to challenge these freaks.
Just ask Client #9, who managed to escape with his life.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... get himself an old jalopy with no computer/black box, and roll up/down windows in it... Like the one Columbo (Peter Faulk) drove in the TV series.
Lunacee_2013
(529 posts)but who is client #9?
theaocp
(4,236 posts)Lunacee_2013
(529 posts)HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)... round 'em all up and throw in those for-profit prisons.
We are stating to look a lot like the French did just prior to their revolution. And remember how the peasants solved the problem?
nineteen50
(1,187 posts)absolute cronyism and corruption at the top you would have thought we would have learned from that instead of listening to ronnie rayguns.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... I should have put "sarcasm" by it. Sorry. I thought it was a rather funny joke.
Hey, since you brought it up, don't you know the 1% makes jokes like this about the rabble 99%?
Who knows? Maybe we ARE approaching our 2nd revolution? Won't happen in my life time.
Life in America is pretty EERIE right now. Wouldn't you agree?
emsimon33
(3,128 posts)Down to the 7th generation.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Those are the job creators you speak of.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Congress, judges, etc.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)The government once was the referee that kept the game honest.
Now they're the crooked refs who make sure the game turns out the way the Mafia wants.
malaise
(268,930 posts)cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)eom
Civilization2
(649 posts)Given a choice between money and integrity, they took the money.
Keep your wealth away from Wall St. out of corporate investments of any kind. Invest in people you know, invest in your community, in the farmers that produce your food, in the local wind/solar farm that produces your energy.
Degrowth, Slow Money, Permaculture, Relocalize, etc.
The Corporate System is rife with corruption and organized scamming, with ZERO policing by our governments. The whole system is based on the lie of endless growth and this is not possible on a finite planet, the music stops eventually and some "investors" are left with nothing while some banksters always seem to be loading up on wealth. Wonder why that is eh.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)how he breaks the complicated bits down to understandable bites.
frylock
(34,825 posts)byeya
(2,842 posts)companies that do ratings for fees,aren't they?
I think it's a conflict of interest, or one in waiting, for a corporation(say) to hire Standard and Poors to rate a bond offering and then pay them for this rating. I would think S&P would tend to give a higher rating because they need the repeat business.
RainDog
(28,784 posts)liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)trumad
(41,692 posts)I fade back to the old days when Super Troll Banned by Kos roamed our halls.
smokey nj
(43,853 posts)whenever someone links to a piece by Matt Taibbi.