General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsStupid question: what started the Nader flood?
Sorry. I try to keep up with news but we're doing our formal wedding ceremony in a week and, well, I can only keep up with so much at once (plus I wrote the wedding music so I'm on the phone with the string quartet about bowing directions since my music notation software doesn't print those well).
Anyways, as I said, stupid question: did Nader just make a statement about 2016? (Or 2014?) What brought this flood on?
Yes, Google is my friend, but I've found DU's answers to stupid questions are much more informative and amusing.
struggle4progress
(118,278 posts)Clinton in 2016? No thank you, says Nader ...
We really need a dynasty now? Weve had twelve years of the Bushes, what do you want eight more years of the Clintons? Do we really want a redux here or do we want fresh energy and refresh redirection? Of his specific criticisms of Clinton, Nader says the former Secretary of State never saw a weapons system she didnt like, never challenged the Pentagon when she was on the Senate Armed Services Committee ...
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/ralph-nader-outlines-2016-plan-93286.html
Wait Wut
(8,492 posts)Now I know why I didn't know. Because I don't care.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)That explains it.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)Thanks. i was wondering too.
Wait Wut
(8,492 posts)...if possible, please post the finished piece...after the ceremony, of course! You had me at 'string quartet'.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)And, for anyone who's wondering, writing the wedding music gets you, I've found, huge groom points.
still_one
(92,138 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)I promise I'm not acting stupid, just actually being stupid. Which decision?
still_one
(92,138 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)The Nader flood started as far as I can tell yesterday morning.
still_one
(92,138 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)A major civil rights era piece of legislation.
If Gore won the election, this likely wouldn't have happened because he wouldn't have appointed conservatives to the court.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)This Nader flood has been around for at least 36 hours.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)I hadn't noticed.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)and forever more I will repeat them til the 80-20 is here.
At that point, I hope Mr. Nader is forever forgotten about.
He broke it, he owns it.
He said Al and George were one and the same.
he lied.
Even if you believe everything else is the same, SCOTUS makes the two sides different
(I for one don't believe Nader is correct in any shape or form.
IN 2013, the worst democratic person in office, is better than the best republican one.
struggle4progress
(118,278 posts)Skidmore
(37,364 posts)I'm impressed with the composition of the score. Congratulations.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)This is just the rehearsal for that...
The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)of DU.
byeya
(2,842 posts)the shovel. Pro-union; pro-environment; pro-privacy cut no ice with this administration.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)then after you vote, he treats us like his gimp and locks us in a trunk.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)as they aren't real bright and think this is the only thing democrats talk about