Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsObama deserves "unqualified praise" for a "momentous step he didn't have to take" (DOMA)
said Glenn Greenwald in 2011:
http://www.democracynow.org/2011/2/24/obama_abandons_defense_of_marriage_act
JUAN GONZALEZ: Well, Glenn, I want to ask you about another major story. Attorney General Eric Holder announced on Wednesday that the Justice Department will no longer defend the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, which barred federal recognition of same-sex marriages. Talk about the significance of this decision.
GLENN GREENWALD: This is one of those rare instances where I think true and kind of unqualified praise is deserved for the White House. This was not something that was expected or even really demanded by gay organizations and leading gay groups. This had been an issue for some time, that the administration was actively defending the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act. Even lower courts had said that it was unconstitutional, and yet the Justice Department continued to defend it. And the excuse that was given was that, "Well, as the Justice Department, were obligated to defend the constitutionality of statutes, even when we dont agree with them and even when we think theyre unconstitutional." Well, that excuse has now been thrown by the wayside, as the administration reversed itself and has said that they will no longer defend the constitutionality of DOMA, and in fact will argue to courts that they think its actually unconstitutional.
The Defense of Marriage Act is a truly pernicious piece of legislation that was passed with overwhelming support of both parties in the mid-1990s under President Clinton. And what it does is theres a slew of marital rights, 800 legal rights or so, very significant rights like survivor benefits for federal benefits, the right to be exempt from estate tax, mostly most important, I think, immigration rights for gay citizens who are in a relationship with a foreign national, that are given freely to opposite-sex couples but, as a result of DOMA, denied to same-sex couples. And the fact that the administration is now going to take the position that this law is unconstitutional and even more significantly, will say that, in general, gay citizens should be treated the same as racial minorities and women and religious and ethnic minorities when it comes to analyzing laws that are aimed at them constitutionally is a truly momentous step that this White House didnt have to take and chose to.
JUAN GONZALEZ: Well, Glenn, I want to ask you about another major story. Attorney General Eric Holder announced on Wednesday that the Justice Department will no longer defend the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, which barred federal recognition of same-sex marriages. Talk about the significance of this decision.
GLENN GREENWALD: This is one of those rare instances where I think true and kind of unqualified praise is deserved for the White House. This was not something that was expected or even really demanded by gay organizations and leading gay groups. This had been an issue for some time, that the administration was actively defending the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act. Even lower courts had said that it was unconstitutional, and yet the Justice Department continued to defend it. And the excuse that was given was that, "Well, as the Justice Department, were obligated to defend the constitutionality of statutes, even when we dont agree with them and even when we think theyre unconstitutional." Well, that excuse has now been thrown by the wayside, as the administration reversed itself and has said that they will no longer defend the constitutionality of DOMA, and in fact will argue to courts that they think its actually unconstitutional.
The Defense of Marriage Act is a truly pernicious piece of legislation that was passed with overwhelming support of both parties in the mid-1990s under President Clinton. And what it does is theres a slew of marital rights, 800 legal rights or so, very significant rights like survivor benefits for federal benefits, the right to be exempt from estate tax, mostly most important, I think, immigration rights for gay citizens who are in a relationship with a foreign national, that are given freely to opposite-sex couples but, as a result of DOMA, denied to same-sex couples. And the fact that the administration is now going to take the position that this law is unconstitutional and even more significantly, will say that, in general, gay citizens should be treated the same as racial minorities and women and religious and ethnic minorities when it comes to analyzing laws that are aimed at them constitutionally is a truly momentous step that this White House didnt have to take and chose to.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 854 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Obama deserves "unqualified praise" for a "momentous step he didn't have to take" (DOMA) (Original Post)
Enrique
Jun 2013
OP
MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)1. K&R
Savannahmann
(3,891 posts)2. Delete this thread
It goes against the Meme that Greenwald is an Obama hating rabid RW troll who is doing the Snowden/NSA/FBI/Whoever else story just to fuck Obama over because of his unequaled hatred (probably racist in nature).
Delete it immediately.
Wounded Bear
(58,634 posts)3. Nice attempt at a de-rail...
but by replying, I just this.
Savannahmann
(3,891 posts)6. No attempt at a de-rail.
Just the point, obvious to me from the get go, that Greenwald may not be a fan, but he's certainly no hate filled lunatic who is using anything he can drum up to make President Obama look bad.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)5. no "probably" about it
if it's not racism that prevents Greenwald from EVER praising Obama, than what could it be?
sibelian
(7,804 posts)7. Political opinions? nt.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)4. WOW!! Greenwald Back handed bashes Obama.....AGAIN, who wouldah thunk it?