General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOliver Stone, Noam Chomsky, Tom Hayden (+ YOU) Urge President Correa to Grant Snowden Asylum
Oliver Stone, Noam Chomsky, Tom Hayden Urge President Correa to Grant Snowden Asylum
Submitted by Megan Iorio on 26 June 2013 - 3:12pm
Dear President Correa,
We write to urge you to grant political asylum to whistle-blower Edward Snowden.
Snowdens disclosures have already done much to unveil the alarming scale of U.S. government spying on its own citizens and on people around the world. They have revealed severe overreach by the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA), which seeks to gather an overwhelming and invasive amount of information on people within the United States. Snowden has also revealed that the constant NSA surveillance also applies to millions of people outside the U.S., whose phone calls, emails and other communications are also indiscriminately targeted.
These are severe abuses of the basic constitutional rights of U.S. citizens and the rights of people in other nations. Yet rather than focusing on the danger to citizens' freedom and privacy exposed by these revelations, and what reforms are necessary to protect citizens' rights, the Obama administration, the U.S. Congress and much of the media are again focusing their ire on the messenger the brave whistle-blower who, at great personal risk, decided to step forward and inform the U.S. public about what is being done in their name and what is being done to them. Sadly, a great deal of the media and other institutions that should play the role of watchdog have largely abdicated their responsibility.
We have seen this drama play out several times before under the Obama administration. The administration has charged more than twice as many whistle-blowers under the Espionage Act than all previous presidents combined. These have included Thomas Drake who also exposed wrongdoing at the NSA, and most notably Private Bradley Manning, who stands accused of providing Wikileaks with information that revealed U.S. war crimes, U.S. meddling in other countries affairs, and other grave and troubling misdeeds. Manning was held for three years before his trial under conditions that a formal U.N. investigation found to be cruel, inhuman and degrading.
Many of us petitioned last year for you to grant political asylum to Wikileaks founder Julian Assange. Assange, who as you know well, has been targeted by the U.S. government for publishing evidence of U.S. war crimes most notably the Collateral Murder video of a U.S. helicopter attack on civilians in Iraq and other information embarrassing to the U.S. government. The Obama administrations consideration of Espionage Act charges against Assange and Wikileaks, via a grand jury, and bellicose rhetoric by top administration officials and members of Congress, amount to a chilling assault on freedom of the press. We were glad to see you act to support this vital freedom by recognizing Assanges political persecution and granting him asylum and refuge at the Ecuadorean embassy in London.
As could have been the case with Assange, Mannings treatment since his arrest shows that Snowden could be subjected to cruel and unusual punishment if he were taken into U.S. custody. There is also a grave danger that Snowden would have difficulty in receiving a fair trial in the U.S. a point he reportedly has made in his petition for asylum. Mannings case also shows that Snowdens constitutional right to a speedy trial might also not be secure. These are all serious examples of political persecution against Manning that may await Snowden if he becomes a U.S. prisoner.
It is no doubt your courageous decision to grant Assange asylum that has encouraged Edward Snowden to also seek asylum in Ecuador. Your choice in Assanges case was not without consequences; the U.S. and U.K. governments reacted angrily, with British police keeping Assange confined to the embassy. Since Assange is being targeted by the U.S. government, there has and no doubt will be more political repercussions. You knew this and yet you acted in the name of justice, saying Latin America is free and sovereign and
we'll not put up with meddling, colonialism of any kind, at least in this country, small, but with a big heart."
Charging someone with espionage, who clearly did not commit espionage, is strong prima facie evidence of political persecution. The unprecedented quantity of whistle-blowers that have been charged under the Espionage Act by the Obama administration suggests that it is applying this law in a completely arbitrary fashion. In Snowdens case what he has revealed are actions by the NSA that violate the U.S. Constitutions Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. There is no evidence whatsoever that his revelations have in any way threatened U.S. national security or were ever intended to do so. Yet rather than pursue reforms that would protect the rights of people in the U.S. and around the world, the Obama administration again seeks to silence those who have brought these abuses to light. These are actions of political repression, and you would be right to grant Snowden political asylum.
Thank you for your consideration of our request.
Sincerely,
Oliver Stone
Noam Chomsky
Tom Hayden
Daniel Ellsberg
Shia LaBeouf, Actor
Cenk Uygur, co-founder, The Young Turks
Thomas Drake, former NSA Senior Executive, whistleblower
Jacob Appelbaum, Developer, The Tor Project
Medea Benjamin, Cofounder, CODEPINK
Jodie Evans, Cofounder, CODEPINK
Ann Wright, US Army Colonel (Ret) and former US diplomat
Ray McGovern, Former U.S. Army officer and longtime senior CIA analyst (ret.)
Mark Weisbrot, Co-director, Center for Economic and Policy Research
Bill Fletcher, Jr., writer/activist
Kevin Gosztola, Journalist, Firedoglake.com
Kent Spriggs, Guantanamo habeas counsel
Kevin Martin, Executive Director, Peace Action
Kathy Kelly, Co-coordinator, Voices for Creative Nonviolence
Mark C. Johnson, Executive Director, Fellowship of Reconciliation
Rabbi Michael Lerner, Editor, Tikkun and Chair, The Network of Spiritual Progressives
Norman Solomon, Cofounder, RootsAction.org
Jeff Cohen, Founder of FAIR
Michael Beer, Executive Director, Nonviolence International
Maya Schenwar, Executive Director, Truthout
Michael Albert, co-editor, ZNet, Z Magazine
Robert Naiman, Policy Director, Just Foreign Policy
Sam Husseini, Director, Washington office of the Institute for Public Accuracy
Miguel Tinker Salas, Professor of History, Pomona College
David Blacker, Prof. of Philosophy of Education & Legal Studies, U. Delaware; Editor, Education Review
Marc Becker, Professor of History, Truman State University
Adrienne Pine, Assistant Professor of Anthropology, American University
C. G. Estabrook, Visiting Professor (retired), University of Illinois
Carolyn Eisenberg, Professor of US Foreign Policy, Hofstra University
Peter Kuznick, Professor of History, American University; co-author with Oliver Stone of The Untold History of the United States
To add your signature, click here
http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/node/1421
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)flamingdem
(39,308 posts)he rejects the Snowden asylum.
Venezuela has issues regarding trade with the USA as well.
There's quite a bit of game playing going on due to these factors.
These are some of the real reasons Snowden is still in Moscow.
Petitions are pretty meaningless with billions on the line.
snot
(10,502 posts)kenny blankenship
(15,689 posts)It's a cold world and very, very small.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Last edited Wed Jun 26, 2013, 07:06 PM - Edit history (1)
This is a marvelous encapsulation that needs to be forwarded to every American, as well.
Charging someone with espionage, who clearly did not commit espionage, is strong prima facie evidence of political persecution. The unprecedented quantity of whistle-blowers that have been charged under the Espionage Act by the Obama administration suggests that it is applying this law in a completely arbitrary fashion. In Snowdens case what he has revealed are actions by the NSA that violate the U.S. Constitutions Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. There is no evidence whatsoever that his revelations have in any way threatened U.S. national security or were ever intended to do so. Yet rather than pursue reforms that would protect the rights of people in the U.S. and around the world, the Obama administration again seeks to silence those who have brought these abuses to light. These are actions of political repression, and you would be right to grant Snowden political asylum.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)nt
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Don't entertain this garbage.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022981567
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.[note 1][1]
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)that is *exactly* what is concerning you here.
What an unconscionable tragedy for our nation that the Obama administration never showed any interest in making sure Bush, Cheney, et al. got to enjoy these Sixth Amendment rights, but instead got right to work to legalize, entrench, and expand the surveillance state.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)makes no sense.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Don't entertain this garbage.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022981567
burnodo
(2,017 posts)Democrats obviously don't believe in the rule of law. Why so selective?
Karmadillo
(9,253 posts)marions ghost
(19,841 posts)Last edited Wed Jun 26, 2013, 07:34 PM - Edit history (1)
won't get on any government surveillance lists by signing this?
oh wait...
Catherina
(35,568 posts)progressoid
(49,945 posts)k/r
burnodo
(2,017 posts)nt
progressoid
(49,945 posts)Catherina
(35,568 posts)What a coincidence that it was over FISA.
burnodo
(2,017 posts)Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)kentuck
(111,052 posts)Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)Last edited Wed Jun 26, 2013, 07:40 PM - Edit history (1)
Since I have recently reestablished contact with people from the tiny and unabashedly conservative western Pennsylvania hometown I left exactly 40 years ago tomorrow - I wanted to write something that would appeal to both liberal and my old conservative and libertarian hometown and classmates:
Whatever you think of Mr. Snowden - whatever you personal politics are - Mr. Snowden is a libertarian and I am a socialist - you could not get farther part. But he has taken a stand against tyranny - tyranny supported by both parties - by the current President and the former - Like with Paul Revere - the fate of a nation is riding with him - Please stand with him now and sign this petitions in support of a request for political asylum for this brave and heroic young man.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)--sincere good luck getting those folks to pull together for a change.
Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)that massive intrusive surveillance is bad under Obama but would be good under a Republican President. Could you imagine ANYONE EVER trying to argue that keeping records of everyone's electronic communications are perfectly fine if their party does it - but totally evil if their opposing party does it? I'm sure if somebody came here and tried sell that nonsense - they would get laughed off the forum.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)flamingdem
(39,308 posts)The US is their biggest trade partner.
Correa is being coy and saying they need two months to decide about asylum. Doubtful.
What they need is cover for the issue of the trade agreements.
Ironically Snowden may do Ecuador a huge favor. The US was borderline about approval
of the agreements going forward, but they may approve as a quid pro quo with Ecuador
so that they don't take Snowden.
Correa would take him if it bolsters his standing in Latam.
For sure his advisors are telling him about the billions they'll lose however.