Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Vietnameravet

(1,085 posts)
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:21 PM Jun 2013

Another leaker

Legal sources tell NBC News that the former second ranking officer in the U.S. military is now the target of a Justice Department investigation into a politically sensitive leak of classified information about a covert U.S. cyber attack on Iran’s nuclear program.

According to legal sources, Retired Marine Gen. James “Hoss” Cartwright, the former vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has received a target letter informing him that he’s under investigation for allegedly leaking information about a massive attack using a computer virus named Stuxnet on Iran’s nuclear facilities. Gen. Cartwright, 63, becomes the latest individual targeted over alleged leaks by the Obama administration, which has already prosecuted or charged eight individuals under the Espionage Act.

Last year, the New York Times reported that Cartwright, a four-star general who was vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs from 2007 to 2011, conceived and ran the cyber operation, called Olympic Games, under Presidents Bush and Obama. According to the front-page story by chief Washington correspondent David Sanger, President Obama ordered the cyber attacks sped up, and in 2010 an attack using the Stuxnet worm temporarily disabled 1,000 centrifuges that the Iranians were using to enrich uranium.

The Times story included details of the Olympic Games operation, including the cooperation of Israeli intelligence and the way the virus was introduced to an Iranian nuclear facility. It described meetings in the White House Situation Room and was based on interviews with “current and former American, European and Israeli officials involved in the program.”

As soon as the Times report appeared, Congressional leaders demanded a criminal probe, and president Obama said he had “zero tolerance” for “these kinds of leaks.” Republicans charged that senior administration officials had leaked the details to bolster the president’s national security credentials during the 2012 campaign.

But, said legal sources, while the probe that Attorney General Eric Holder ordered initially focused on whether the information came from inside the White House, by late last year FBI agents were zeroing in on Cartwright, who had served as one of the president’s “inner circle” of national security advisors. Two sources said prosecutors were able to identify Cartwright as a suspected leaker without resorting to a secret subpoena of the phone records of New York Times reporters.


http://investigations.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/27/19174350-ex-pentagon-general-target-of-leak-investigation-sources-say?lite

60 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Another leaker (Original Post) Vietnameravet Jun 2013 OP
so, uh arely staircase Jun 2013 #1
Please provide a link ... GeorgeGist Jun 2013 #3
No one has declaired war on Iran but Vietnameravet Jun 2013 #6
Or for reading Japanese embassy traffic....before WW2 -- between the wars MADem Jun 2013 #48
what are you talking about? arely staircase Jun 2013 #8
i am going to be the first and hopefully not the last to SwampG8r Jun 2013 #40
exactly and thank you arely staircase Jun 2013 #42
this is "the pivitol moment" everyone keeps claiming is happening SwampG8r Jun 2013 #44
sure arely staircase Jun 2013 #45
i kicked up your thread on it SwampG8r Jun 2013 #46
'Tis the Season of the Leakers. This could actually become a pivotal phenomenon 99th_Monkey Jun 2013 #2
Every other nation spys.. Vietnameravet Jun 2013 #4
But not on their own citizens nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #7
Hell they don't Vietnameravet Jun 2013 #9
You should review the oath you took and the bill of rights nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #10
You are wrong Vietnameravet Jun 2013 #15
You missed warrants. nadinbrzezinski Jun 2013 #27
In this day and technology, they all spy, open and closed. Amonester Jun 2013 #41
this is about stopping the iranian nuclear program, not "spying" on americans arely staircase Jun 2013 #12
unbelievable, ain't it? Whisp Jun 2013 #16
so this is how it happens? arely staircase Jun 2013 #20
We're all Iranian Government now! OilemFirchen Jun 2013 #21
Bobby was not as enamored with spying as you suggest, 99th_Monkey Jun 2013 #13
No one is enamored of spying but Vietnameravet Jun 2013 #19
"sometimes you have to spy" 99th_Monkey Jun 2013 #25
no, trust "the generals" arely staircase Jun 2013 #18
FYI: The use of "nt" is intended to save readers from tblue37 Jun 2013 #37
You should win an award for civic mindedness. My sincere HardTimes99 Jun 2013 #43
"politically sensitive leak of classified information about a covert U.S. cyber attack on Iran’s Cha Jun 2013 #49
Did you miss this part of my post? 99th_Monkey Jun 2013 #51
Those that attacked Manning and Snowden Harmony Blue Jun 2013 #5
Yeah, get behind the coup. arely staircase Jun 2013 #11
That obviously is not the motivation Harmony Blue Jun 2013 #14
as we all are arely staircase Jun 2013 #17
You say he is helping the enemy Harmony Blue Jun 2013 #22
By reducing their nuclear capabilities. OilemFirchen Jun 2013 #24
Just because we don't agree does not mean Harmony Blue Jun 2013 #26
And this program was designed to help PREVENT an incursion into Iran. OilemFirchen Jun 2013 #33
You're not a mindreader, so how do you know his mindset? n/t pnwmom Jun 2013 #30
Why on earth would you suggest that? OilemFirchen Jun 2013 #23
I would never call someone that has served in our Armed Forces Harmony Blue Jun 2013 #28
This was a career soldier and member of the JCS. OilemFirchen Jun 2013 #31
Who leaked the Pakistani doctors involvement? dkf Jun 2013 #29
Looks like a nice cozy jail cell might be in this general's future. Cali_Democrat Jun 2013 #47
Do not be on the wrong side of history arely staircase Jun 2013 #32
This is like a military coup at this point. DevonRex Jun 2013 #34
I am seriously beginning to wonder about Hasting's demise now. Whisp Jun 2013 #52
Shouldn't assume that such a leak would be solely for positive effect upon perceptions of this patrice Jun 2013 #35
Can someone explain to me how this is a military ohheckyeah Jun 2013 #36
My take of it is, the General was denied his requests for bombing Iran by Obama & staff. Amonester Jun 2013 #39
Let's not forget Petraeus, and McChrystal. Whisp Jun 2013 #54
QUICK, authoritarians! Come up with some smears! n/t backscatter712 Jun 2013 #38
the stupid General smeared himself.. by wanting Iran to know about Cha Jun 2013 #50
That's likely ProSense Jun 2013 #53
And, they're salivating for Gen Cartwright.. because, well, Cha Jun 2013 #60
Maybe the Generals don't like this new fangled cyberwars of the future Whisp Jun 2013 #55
I think they don't like taking orders from the fancy pants liberal arely staircase Jun 2013 #58
Throw the traitorous bastard in the brig! B Calm Jun 2013 #56
It's hard to tell if you are kidding or not. Whisp Jun 2013 #59
Why would the guy who created it, leak it? unless... allin99 Jun 2013 #57

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
1. so, uh
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:25 PM
Jun 2013

if some unelected general has leaked how our elected civilian leadership kept the Iranians from getting The Bomb, you Snowden fans gonna defend THIS? How very military coupish.

GeorgeGist

(25,311 posts)
3. Please provide a link ...
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:36 PM
Jun 2013

to documentation that our elected officials have declared war on Iran.

Thanks in advance.

 

Vietnameravet

(1,085 posts)
6. No one has declaired war on Iran but
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:39 PM
Jun 2013

by your logic Roosevelt should have been removed for helping those who opposed Hitler..

MADem

(135,425 posts)
48. Or for reading Japanese embassy traffic....before WW2 -- between the wars
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 02:29 AM
Jun 2013
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_(cryptography)

RED[edit]
In 1923, a US Navy officer acquired a stolen copy of the Secret Operating Code codebook used by the Japanese Navy during World War I. Photographs of the codebook were given to the cryptanalysts at the Research Desk and the processed code was kept in red-colored folders (to indicate its Top Secret classification). This code was called "RED".
BLUE[edit]
In 1930, the Japanese government created a more complex code that was codenamed BLUE, although RED was still being used for low-level communications. It was quickly broken by the Research Desk by 1932. US Military Intelligence COMINT listening stations began monitoring command-to-fleet, ship-to-ship, and land-based communications.
PURPLE[edit]
After Japan's ally Germany declared war in the fall of 1939, the German government began sending technical assistance to upgrade their communications and cryptography capabilities. One part was to send them modified Enigma machines to secure Japan's high-level communications with Germany. The new code, codenamed PURPLE (from the color you get when you mix red and blue), was baffling.
PURPLE, like Enigma, began its communications with the same line of code but then became an unfathomable jumble. Codebreakers tried to break PURPLE communiques by hand but found they could not. Then the codebreakers realized that it was not a manual additive or substitution code like RED and BLUE, but a machine-generated code similar to Germany's Enigma cipher. Decoding was slow and much of the traffic was still hard to break. By the time the traffic was decoded and translated, the contents were often out of date.
A reverse-engineered machine created in 1939 by a team of technicians led by William Friedman and Frank Rowlett could figure out some of the PURPLE code by replicating some of the settings of the Japanese Enigma machines. This sped up decoding and the addition of more translators on staff in 1942 made it easier and quicker to decipher the traffic intercepted.


PURPLE traffic[edit]

The Japanese Foreign Office used a cipher machine to encrypt its diplomatic messages. The machine was called "PURPLE" by U.S. cryptographers. A message was typed into the machine, which enciphered and sent it to an identical machine. The receiving machine could decipher the message only if set to the correct settings, or keys. American cryptographers were able to build a machine that could decrypt these messages.
The PURPLE machine itself was first used by Japan in 1940. U.S. and British cryptographers had broken some PURPLE traffic well before the attack on Pearl Harbor. However, the PURPLE machines were used only by the Foreign Office to carry diplomatic traffic to its embassies. The Japanese Navy used a completely different crypto-system, known as JN-25.
U.S. analysts discovered no hint in PURPLE of the impending Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor; nor could they, as the Japanese were very careful not to discuss their plan in Foreign Office communications. In fact, no detailed information about the planned attack was even available to the Japanese Foreign Office, as that agency was regarded by the military, particularly its more nationalist members, as insufficiently "reliable". U.S. access to private Japanese diplomatic communications (even the most secret ones) was less useful than it might otherwise have been because policy in prewar Japan was controlled largely by military groups (e.g., in Manchuria and elsewhere in China), not by the Foreign Office. The Foreign Office itself deliberately withheld from its embassies and consulates much of the information it did have, so the ability to read PURPLE messages was less than definitive regarding Japanese tactical or strategic military intentions.
U.S. cryptographers had decrypted and translated the 14-part Japanese diplomatic message breaking off ongoing negotiations with the U.S. at 1 p.m. Washington time on 7 December 1941, even before the Japanese Embassy in Washington could do so. As a result of the deciphering and typing difficulties at the embassy, the note was delivered late to American Secretary of State Cordell Hull. When the two Japanese diplomats finally delivered the note, Hull had to pretend to be reading it for the first time, even though he already knew about the attack on Pearl Harbor.[1]
Throughout the war, the Allies routinely read both German and Japanese cryptography. The Japanese Ambassador to Germany, General Hiroshi Ōshima, often sent priceless German military information to Tokyo. This information was routinely intercepted and read by Roosevelt, Churchill and Eisenhower.[2] According to Lowman, "The Japanese considered the PURPLE system absolutely unbreakable.... Most went to their graves refusing to believe the [cipher] had been broken by analytic means.... They believed someone had betrayed their system."[3]


This is what countries do. It's silly to act like it is 'news' or some sort of shocking behavior.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
8. what are you talking about?
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:41 PM
Jun 2013

I am referring to the OP that says some unelected general has tried to undercut his elected civilian commander in chief.

Civilian control of the military is a cornerstone of our democracy and you folks who want to kneejerk react to this and think it is great better give it some serious fucking thought.

You want to talk about altering the Republic for an Empire this is it, friends. This is real.

SwampG8r

(10,287 posts)
40. i am going to be the first and hopefully not the last to
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 01:20 AM
Jun 2013

agree with you almost totally
snowden and the nsa and the cia and the fbi all aside

having high level officers leaking info to force an agenda is the empire stretching its arms
it almost has a military coup feel
anyone defending an officer of the us military "leaking" is no friend of america

SwampG8r

(10,287 posts)
44. this is "the pivitol moment" everyone keeps claiming is happening
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 01:34 AM
Jun 2013

and I read your posts and want to say usually we disagree in a major way
and im kind of a dick sometimes so you may even already know me
but if the military cannot trust its major command officers to follow their sworn oaths,we have turned the corner

eta: irony alert see next response to the OP lol

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
45. sure
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 01:42 AM
Jun 2013

whatever other disagreements, this is one I can say for sure - if this happened under Bush, I would want the book thrown at the general.

Military men deciding they don't like the civilian leadership not bombing some place, then leaking the whole thing to undermine said civilian leadership is just absolutely contrary to anything we have been, said we are, thought we are, been or pretended to be since 1789.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
2. 'Tis the Season of the Leakers. This could actually become a pivotal phenomenon
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:32 PM
Jun 2013

that keeps growing day by day, on the world stage, where virtually every other
nation on earth is cheering on the leaker of the day. USA gov't's arrogant disregard
for basic constitutional rights is on full display.

Whatever happened to US being a beacon of liberty & democracy to the rest of the
world anyway?

 

Vietnameravet

(1,085 posts)
4. Every other nation spys..
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:37 PM
Jun 2013

Why did you vote for Obama if you cant trust him and believe what he says?

Bobby Kennedy also approved spying..

 

Vietnameravet

(1,085 posts)
9. Hell they don't
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:43 PM
Jun 2013

You seriously think other nations do not spy on their citizens to see who is plotting terrorist attacks against them??

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
10. You should review the oath you took and the bill of rights
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:44 PM
Jun 2013

And no, open societies don't

Now closed societies, all the time.

 

Vietnameravet

(1,085 posts)
15. You are wrong
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:53 PM
Jun 2013

All nations spy and all nation are looking for those that threaten their security...You seriously think the British dont spy on those the consider threats?

And the oath says "defend from all enemies foreign and domestic"

If I am searching for local connections to international terrorists then there is no way I can avoid spying on local citizens..

President Obama has said no ones phones were listened to and there are adequate safeguards...both in the congress and the courts..and I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt considering the dangers we face...

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
27. You missed warrants.
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 11:08 PM
Jun 2013

And no, open societies do not soy on their citizens...they use police techniques and warrants. I know this is pre 911 thinking...sorry, should I report now to the reeducation camp?

Amonester

(11,541 posts)
41. In this day and technology, they all spy, open and closed.
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 01:22 AM
Jun 2013

Why do you thing the street cams businesses are booming like crazy?

If you don't believe it, can you show us the way to Utopia?

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
12. this is about stopping the iranian nuclear program, not "spying" on americans
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:47 PM
Jun 2013

you are being played.

this smells of a fucking coup against the elected civilian leadership of our republic.

really, gonna support the generals?

bullshit

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
13. Bobby was not as enamored with spying as you suggest,
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:48 PM
Jun 2013

especially when it became apparent that J. Edger was spying
on the Kennedy clan,and on Martin Luther King.

 

Vietnameravet

(1,085 posts)
19. No one is enamored of spying but
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:55 PM
Jun 2013

sometimes you have to do it.. There are real threats out there and we have to deal with them..

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
25. "sometimes you have to spy"
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 11:05 PM
Jun 2013

Well, perhaps what you say has some merit; but we don't spy
just "sometimes" in "special" cases anymore, we do it 24/7 on
the entire population. <-- THIS is what people are rightfully
concerned about.,

So your "sometimes" seems a bit disingenuous.

tblue37

(65,217 posts)
37. FYI: The use of "nt" is intended to save readers from
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 11:59 PM
Jun 2013

wating time opening a post when in fact the entire text of the post is found in the subject line. By using "nt" in the subject line, you are thoughtfully saving readers wasted time.

But by putting the "nt" in the message box itself you are completely defeating the purpose of "nt" (which means there is "no text" in the message box). It serves no purpose if it is in the message box itself, because the reader must open the message box to read the "nt."

BTW, the same is true for "eom." It means that the subject line is the end of the message, so don't bother opening the message itself.

Cha

(296,802 posts)
49. "politically sensitive leak of classified information about a covert U.S. cyber attack on Iran’s
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 03:22 AM
Jun 2013

nuclear program."

Legal sources tell NBC News that the former second ranking officer in the U.S. military is now the target of a Justice Department investigation into a politically sensitive leak of classified information about a covert U.S. cyber attack on Iran’s nuclear program.

So, you're rooting for the General who's accused of leaking classified information that let Iran know about a cover U.S. cyber attack on Iran's nuclear program?

The US is striving for Democracy in a country with a lot of idiots who are trying to bring it down.. while many of us are working to make it stronger.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
51. Did you miss this part of my post?
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 03:41 AM
Jun 2013
Whatever happened to US being a beacon of liberty & democracy to the rest of the
world anyway?




How can you not "get" this? All of our Karmic chickens are coming home to roost,
like they always do eventually. This does not make me happy at all, rather it makes
me very very sad. The American Empire was destined to end eventually, like all those
other Empires in the history books, now the US Empire appears to be grinding to a halt.

As a citizen I have observed way too much collusion between Big Corporations &
Government, to the extent that I have very little faith in my government anymore.

We all know we've lost our way, that we're going to have Hell to pay, we feel it in our
bones; which is why there are so many dystopian themed movies/

Harmony Blue

(3,978 posts)
5. Those that attacked Manning and Snowden
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:37 PM
Jun 2013

will have a hard time attacking this leaker but they will try for sure.

Harmony Blue

(3,978 posts)
14. That obviously is not the motivation
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:50 PM
Jun 2013

of this leaker's mindset. But you are allowed to come to your own conclusions.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
17. as we all are
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 10:54 PM
Jun 2013

but people need to think very very seriously about this. this isn't bradley manning this is a very powerful, unelected man at the top of government, undermining the civilian, elected control of the (our) military.

this is dangerous ground. big time.

Harmony Blue

(3,978 posts)
26. Just because we don't agree does not mean
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 11:08 PM
Jun 2013

mean it is bizarre. Honestly the leaks had an effect on world opinion. World opinion pretty much opposed U.S. invasion war drums that were beating at the time.

OilemFirchen

(7,143 posts)
33. And this program was designed to help PREVENT an incursion into Iran.
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 11:22 PM
Jun 2013

Disable their nukes, reduce the threat, decrease the pressure for engagement. I simply cannot understand how it can be seen any other way.

Harmony Blue

(3,978 posts)
28. I would never call someone that has served in our Armed Forces
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 11:10 PM
Jun 2013

"scum". I just can't do it but I will say that they tend to feel regret joining the profitable war machine, hence their rebellion. I know differently, which is why I discourage those from joining the armed forces in the first place.

OilemFirchen

(7,143 posts)
31. This was a career soldier and member of the JCS.
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 11:19 PM
Jun 2013

He had plenty of time to bail, if he felt the slightest remorse. Of course, that he "conceived and ran the cyber operation" that has caused him such angst makes my heart bleed.

Plenty of military are scum. Read up on the white-supremacist ring operating at Fort Bragg, for a quick example.

 

dkf

(37,305 posts)
29. Who leaked the Pakistani doctors involvement?
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 11:11 PM
Jun 2013

Are they being punished?

Bah they leak all the time but then they choose who gets punished. It's a joke.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
47. Looks like a nice cozy jail cell might be in this general's future.
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 02:24 AM
Jun 2013

Props to Obama and Holder for proceeding with this Justice Department investigation.

Boom.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
52. I am seriously beginning to wonder about Hasting's demise now.
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 08:47 AM
Jun 2013

It appears that the military has their own and separate dangerous game going on. I don't think for a minute Hoss was working on his own on this.

Obama was not popular with them right from the start, what with announcing withdrawals from their wars and more recent being hesitant on Syrian involvement. Libya, I am forgetting how that went but very likely the cry to get militarily involved by the brass is a likely.

On Snowden, if he was CIA first... there have been some turf wars between the CIA and NSA, that may have some connection there too. Snowden could be a soldier for the CIA and their dirty interests.

This is freaked out crazy dangerous. All the screamers are blaming the administration when looking at this, it's more like there is a struggle for power and it's the one's looking to take over that are creating a lot of the shit disturbing. But Blame it on Obama is a much easier outlet. Anything else would require some thinking.

patrice

(47,992 posts)
35. Shouldn't assume that such a leak would be solely for positive effect upon perceptions of this
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 11:42 PM
Jun 2013

administration.

the information could be useful for entirely different purposes.

ohheckyeah

(9,314 posts)
36. Can someone explain to me how this is a military
Thu Jun 27, 2013, 11:49 PM
Jun 2013

coup when the general is retired?

I don't think he should have leaked this information but I don't see it as a coup.

Amonester

(11,541 posts)
39. My take of it is, the General was denied his requests for bombing Iran by Obama & staff.
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 01:14 AM
Jun 2013

That General was there in 2007, as did cheney... and bu$h...

Since perhaps President Obama turned his request(s?) down, now that he's retired, by leaking this, he may have just hoped that it would stir up enough (international) sh*t that somewhere, somehow, that sh*t stiring of his would kickstart a new war for oil. There.

I may be wrong (I HOPE I'm wrong), but these military types sometimes, and those with former neocon ties (or 'investments') always think they'll get what they 'want' one way or another.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
54. Let's not forget Petraeus, and McChrystal.
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 09:01 AM
Jun 2013

There seems to be a pack of them that don't like taking orders from the President but work in their own war world.

Cha

(296,802 posts)
50. the stupid General smeared himself.. by wanting Iran to know about
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 03:26 AM
Jun 2013

"a covert U.S. cyber attack on Iran’s nuclear program."

too bad your General didn't get to start a war with Iran.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
53. That's likely
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 08:53 AM
Jun 2013

"too bad your General didn't get to start a war with Iran."

...the motivation behind the recent leaks.


For all we know Fox was going to spin us into a war.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022871121

Cha

(296,802 posts)
60. And, they're salivating for Gen Cartwright.. because, well,
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 05:06 PM
Jun 2013

he's a Leaker like Snowden. he must be good. Talk about outing the stupid.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
55. Maybe the Generals don't like this new fangled cyberwars of the future
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 09:55 AM
Jun 2013

and want the feel of what they are used to, warm and spilled blood instead, and so are retaliating.

Betrayus, McChrystal, now this guy.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
59. It's hard to tell if you are kidding or not.
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 11:47 AM
Jun 2013

what with some of the ridiculous things being said here lately.

I would say this guy is not to be trusted, he had powers that could have caused great harm.

I agree with the brig thing if you were serious.

allin99

(894 posts)
57. Why would the guy who created it, leak it? unless...
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 10:59 AM
Jun 2013

i'm reading it wrong.

Last year, the New York Times reported that Cartwright, a four-star general who was vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs from 2007 to 2011, conceived and ran the cyber operation, called Olympic Games, under Presidents Bush and Obama. According to the front-page story by chief Washington correspondent David Sanger, President Obama ordered the cyber attacks sped up, and in 2010 an attack using the Stuxnet worm temporarily disabled 1,000 centrifuges that the Iranians were using to enrich uranium.


?
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Another leaker