Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mr. Blue Sky

(33 posts)
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 04:52 PM Jun 2013

Hernandez bought "blue cotton candy flavored bubblegum" the night he (allegedly ) brutally executed

executed a man by pumping five .45 cal slugs into his chest.

Why am I mentioning this? Because I've seen hundreds of the "skittles and iced tea" reference as if to convey some air of innocence and normalcy about Trayvon Martin. It is a false association... please don't try to evoke sympathy for someone by pointing out normal, every day activity that anyone would engage in as some kind of evidence of innocence.

Z may or may not be guilty of murder and I hope the truth comes out... then let the chips fall etc. I am not rooting for a conviction or exoneration... I'm rooting for the truth of what happened that night to come to light and that justice is served accordingly.

Perhaps the oddest detail of the case, though, is that one of the key pieces of evidence, it seems, is a piece of blue cotton candy Bubblicious bubble gum. Prosecutors said in court today they can prove Hendandez purchased that gum at a gas station hours before the murder. “Who cares about gum?” you may be asking yourself right now.


http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2013/06/aaron-hernandez-blue-cotton-candy-bubblegum?mbid=social_twitter

42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hernandez bought "blue cotton candy flavored bubblegum" the night he (allegedly ) brutally executed (Original Post) Mr. Blue Sky Jun 2013 OP
I'm thinking DU needs a minimum post count before being able to post threads. Democracyinkind Jun 2013 #1
It does ... GeorgeGist Jun 2013 #6
I forgot. Thanks. Democracyinkind Jun 2013 #13
I agree. LeftofObama Jun 2013 #8
Hey, gay relationships were compared to marriage to a plant by a poster with over 50k posts Bluenorthwest Jun 2013 #18
I thought this TROLL was gone.. he posted the same thing earlier today... K Gardner Jun 2013 #36
Mirt got rid of two others and I have alerted a member of Mirt about this one. hrmjustin Jun 2013 #38
there is a difference. Hernandez was armed and intended to shoot it. Martin was simply thirsty and appleannie1 Jun 2013 #2
The gum is a piece of evidence. Wait Wut Jun 2013 #3
take the red pill. GeorgeGist Jun 2013 #4
My understanding is that this is mentioned because the wrappers to this kind of gum senseandsensibility Jun 2013 #5
The locusts have hatched. n/t winter is coming Jun 2013 #7
The POINT is that Trayvon was carrying Skittles, NOT A GUN. WinkyDink Jun 2013 #9
What does his carrying skittles have to do with anything? n/t Mr. Blue Sky Jun 2013 #12
What does your OP have to do with anything? Wait Wut Jun 2013 #17
It explains … 1StrongBlackMan Jun 2013 #20
Because the killer suggested to police dispatch that his victim was armed. That's why notadmblnd Jun 2013 #29
flailing bullshit. n/t Whisp Jun 2013 #10
Its not about innocence. Its just about what Trayvon was doing there. NoOneMan Jun 2013 #11
Hernandez had a gun AND a .45 Glock. Trayvon had only the Skittles and tea. Do you see a difference? 11 Bravo Jun 2013 #14
This is idiotic. johnp3907 Jun 2013 #15
Zimmerman murdered Trayvon. n/t monmouth3 Jun 2013 #16
Sweet baby Jesus please make it stop npk Jun 2013 #19
Nobody's arguing that Trayvon was sweet baby Jesus himself XemaSab Jun 2013 #21
you are a fucking idiot JI7 Jun 2013 #22
true, but I suggest you edit that. BainsBane Jun 2013 #24
+100000000. Hoyt Jun 2013 #26
Thank You HangOnKids Jun 2013 #30
You beat me to it, but so what... LuvLoogie Jun 2013 #37
You are correct in your assertion. bravenak Jun 2013 #41
Do you have trouble distinguishing a victim from a murderer? BainsBane Jun 2013 #23
Whatever malaise Jun 2013 #25
the thing about it d_r Jun 2013 #27
Been on DU since December and only has 31 posts? Hmmm. Boomerproud Jun 2013 #28
But They Have All Been Meaningful HangOnKids Jun 2013 #31
These two poster were banned today for peddling this Zimmerman is innocent crap. hrmjustin Jun 2013 #32
Jesus H Christ ProudToBeBlueInRhody Jun 2013 #33
LOL. Wow. phleshdef Jun 2013 #34
This place just fucking sucks sometimes: Moses2SandyKoufax Jun 2013 #35
Mirt has been alerted. hrmjustin Jun 2013 #40
You are a fucking idiot. LuvLoogie Jun 2013 #39
I find this to be particularly stupid. bravenak Jun 2013 #42
 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
18. Hey, gay relationships were compared to marriage to a plant by a poster with over 50k posts
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 05:35 PM
Jun 2013

so it is all about who you insult and how much the admins hate the group you insult. Get over it.

appleannie1

(5,062 posts)
2. there is a difference. Hernandez was armed and intended to shoot it. Martin was simply thirsty and
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 04:55 PM
Jun 2013

was walking home in the rain intending to finish watching a basketball game.

senseandsensibility

(16,932 posts)
5. My understanding is that this is mentioned because the wrappers to this kind of gum
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 04:56 PM
Jun 2013

were found in the rental car that he returned, along with a shell casing. So it is part of the evidence.

Wait Wut

(8,492 posts)
17. What does your OP have to do with anything?
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 05:07 PM
Jun 2013

The gum is evidence. Zimmerman claimed Trayvon was 'carrying something'. He was; a cell phone, a bag of Skittles and a can of iced tea.

He didn't kill someone and leave the Skittles wrapper in the rental car, nor offer a witness a piece of cotton candy flavored Skittles.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
20. It explains …
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 09:16 PM
Jun 2013

Why TM was walking, at night, in the rain.

It does away with the stranger acting strangely excuse ... Doesn't it?

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
29. Because the killer suggested to police dispatch that his victim was armed. That's why
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 10:41 PM
Jun 2013

The victim was not armed as GZ implied, All he had in his hands were Arazona flavored drink and a bag of skittles. That's why it is brought up.

"The call that Zimmerman made to a non-emergency dispatcher just after 7 p.m. on the night in question was played repeatedly for jurors, who listened intently and took notes.

On the call, Zimmerman reports that Martin is walking around in the rain and looks like “he’s up to no good,” then says the teen is staring at him and approaching with his hand in his waistband.

After Zimmerman reports that Martin has started to run away, dispatcher Sean Noffke, hearing the sound of movement and wind, asks if he is following. When Zimmerman says he is, Noffke tells him, “You don’t need to do that.”

Under questioning Monday, Noffke said he didn’t order Zimmerman to stay put because dispatchers are only supposed to make suggestions for liability reasons."
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/24/19116607-essential-or-irrelevant-zimmerman-prosecutor-fights-to-reveal-previous-calls-to-cops?lite



Now, do you have a clue?

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
11. Its not about innocence. Its just about what Trayvon was doing there.
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 05:01 PM
Jun 2013

It wasn't illegal. He wasn't a perp, as he was identified by Zimmerman. He wasn't armed or carrying stolen goods. He was minding his own business, engaging in legal activities. There was no reason for him to be profiled.

Likewise, there was nothing especially peculiar about a gum purchase, except that blue cotton candy flavor is most often a favorite of serial killers according to peer reviewed journaled studies

11 Bravo

(23,926 posts)
14. Hernandez had a gun AND a .45 Glock. Trayvon had only the Skittles and tea. Do you see a difference?
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 05:01 PM
Jun 2013

But hey, thanks for playing.

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
21. Nobody's arguing that Trayvon was sweet baby Jesus himself
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 09:23 PM
Jun 2013

He was a normal kid who got into normal trouble.

At the time he was shot, however, he wasn't doing anything. He wasn't out to cause trouble, he was just walking down the street and minding his own business.

The iced tea and skittles establish that he was a kid on a perfectly normal, law-abiding outing when he was chased down and shot like a dog.

d_r

(6,907 posts)
27. the thing about it
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 10:34 PM
Jun 2013

when people bring up that he went to the store to buy skittles, it is usually in response to the "why was he in that gated neighborhood in the first place?" question. He was there because his Dad lived there, and he was out because he went to the store and bought some skittles. That's why it is brought up. And frankly the whole "why was he in that gated neighborhood?" question is racist bullshit to begin with.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
32. These two poster were banned today for peddling this Zimmerman is innocent crap.
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 10:53 PM
Jun 2013
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=128462&sub=trans
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=profile&uid=303475&sub=trans

I will say it again that the Murdering SOB had a gun and the kid had a bag of skiddles and a drink. You figure it out.

Moses2SandyKoufax

(1,290 posts)
35. This place just fucking sucks sometimes:
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 11:03 PM
Jun 2013

At Sat Jun 29, 2013, 02:54 AM you sent an alert on the following post:

Hernandez bought "blue cotton candy flavored bubblegum" the night he (allegedly ) brutally executed
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023121791

REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. (See <a href="http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=aboutus#communitystandards" target="_blank">Community Standards</a>.)

YOUR COMMENTS:

Low post count, looking to start a flame war. What does this have to do with the Trayvon Martin case?

JURY RESULTS

A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Sat Jun 29, 2013, 03:01 AM, and voted 2-4 to LEAVE IT ALONE.

Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: To compare the innocent victim of a violent death with the man charged with murdering one (and possibly multiple people)--that is sick.
Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Oh ffs
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: It's a stupid post, but not a rules violation.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hernandez bought "blue co...