Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPutting Liberty at Risk in the Name of Order and National Security
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/06/30-4In 1792, James Madison published a little dialogue between a "Republican" and an "Anti-republican" entitled "Who Are the Best Keepers of the People's Liberties?" defending the freedoms guaranteed by the Bill of Rights
In this playlet, the "Republican"clearly Madison himselfis a proponent of Liberty. His answer is unequivocal: "The people themselves. The sacred trust can be no where so safe as in the hands most interested in preserving it.
The "Anti-republican" opponent, an advocate of Order, replies: "The people are stupid, suspicious, licentious. They cannot safely trust themselves. When they have established government they should think of nothing but obedience, leaving the care of their liberties to their wiser rulers.
Fast forward to 1991, the Bicentennial of the Bill of Rights. Alfred Sikes, then Chair of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), spoke at the Cleveland City Club about the wonders of new communications media and technologies that were then just coming on-line. In the Q & A following his speech I asked Sikes what threats these innovations might pose to freedom of speech, Press, and religion under the Bill of Rights. His utterly chilling answer was that it would depend on how much free speech, free Press, and freedom of religion "the public demands." In other words, if the people arent actively demanding these freedoms, they dont need them.
***JAMES MADISON WAS A PAULBOT!11
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 896 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Putting Liberty at Risk in the Name of Order and National Security (Original Post)
xchrom
Jun 2013
OP
But Democracy is so damn hard. Authoritarianism is so much easier. Sit back, drink some nice cool
rhett o rick
Jun 2013
#2
Life and something else I just can't remember right now & the pursuit of happiness.
William769
Jul 2013
#5
WillyT
(72,631 posts)1. K & R !!!
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)2. But Democracy is so damn hard. Authoritarianism is so much easier. Sit back, drink some nice cool
Kool-aid and dont worry. GE, Google, Comcast, ATT, and James R. Clapper (lying Republican) will take good care of you.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)3. down with the tyranny of privacy!
reusrename
(1,716 posts)4. The problem is: How can we demand our freedoms?
They've got a pillow over our mouth. How can we make our voices heard?
William769
(55,144 posts)5. Life and something else I just can't remember right now & the pursuit of happiness.
They served us so well for so long. But alas all good things must come to an end.
xchrom
(108,903 posts)6. See what happens when you get older?
Can't remember a damn thing