Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsfugly
On a side note, there's one hellova conversation going on about the F-35 and other expensive war toys at dodbuzz.com.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
12 replies, 2864 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
fugly (Original Post)
unhappycamper
Feb 2012
OP
Compared to the $150 million F-22. That's not counting the infrastructure and personnel
alfredo
Feb 2012
#4
The F-22 is now listed at $418 million dollars - Time magazine had an article about the cost of
unhappycamper
Feb 2012
#9
Actually the opposite. For increased torque, you would narrow the outcone etc.
WingDinger
Feb 2012
#6
alfredo
(60,071 posts)1. There's going to be fewer piloted planes as Drones become the low cost option.
unhappycamper
(60,364 posts)3. I'm not sure $36 million dollar MQ-9 drones are a 'low cost' option.
Drones are also bumping into the problem of the number of people required to operate and fix them. I read last month that it takes somewhere between 235 ~ 300 people to operate a single Reaper or Predator drone.
alfredo
(60,071 posts)4. Compared to the $150 million F-22. That's not counting the infrastructure and personnel
it takes to keep it in the air. All that and there were questions about its mission.
unhappycamper
(60,364 posts)9. The F-22 is now listed at $418 million dollars - Time magazine had an article about the cost of
expensive systems.
And our F-22 fleet has been grounded since last May. All 186 of them.
And our F-22 fleet has been grounded since last May. All 186 of them.
unhappycamper
(60,364 posts)11. Here's a link to the time.com article:
http://www.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1912203_1913322,00.html
Like wikipedia, the costs for the F-35 and other weapons systems are still low.
Like wikipedia, the costs for the F-35 and other weapons systems are still low.
alfredo
(60,071 posts)12. Can you say "white elephant"?
WingDinger
(3,690 posts)2. Im fairly certain, that bulge was an early attempt at hypercruise.
That is: going and staying supersonic, without the wasteful afterburner.
alfredo
(60,071 posts)5. Is that an STOL?
WingDinger
(3,690 posts)6. Actually the opposite. For increased torque, you would narrow the outcone etc.
That is designed to allow more air in, for high speeds.
alfredo
(60,071 posts)8. I was looking at the belly. It appears there are some seams that can be doors.
Here's another image of the plane.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)7. Even uglier is the price tag,
[font size=3]Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children."
---President Dwight Eisenhower
[/font]
---President Dwight Eisenhower
The performance numbers are good,
but the performance limitation is now (and has been for a while) the human in the pilot's seat.
Who and What is this thing supposed to fight?
The High Performance Aircraft Arms Race had been over for a while.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)10. Off the subject..
was that pic taken at Flying Leatherneck Museum on MIRAMAR?