General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBreaking: U.S. tells Russia it would not seek the death penalty if Edward Snowden returns to U.S.
U.S. tells Russia it would not seek the death penalty if Edward Snowden returned to the United States: U.S. Justice Department #breaking
http://www.twitter.com/Reuters
CincyDem
(6,353 posts)Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)that's still fair game. But no death so its all better.
Russia said fuck you
http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/change-russia-extradite-snowden-us-19780190
The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)I'd imagine that by international convention countries should not extradite to us.
Safetykitten
(5,162 posts)Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)Dutch Court Wont Extradite Terror Suspect to US Over Torture Concerns
July 23, 2013
A Dutch court has blocked the extradition of a terrorism suspect to the United States amid concern about American collusion in his torture.
The 26-year-old man, known only as Sabir K, is accused of taking part in attacks on US forces in Afghanistan.
He says he was tortured in Pakistan after his arrest there in 2010, and that the Americans knew about it.
The judge denied the extradition request, saying the degree of US involvement was "unclear".
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)But thanks.
AllINeedIsCoffee
(772 posts)Rated as: PROMISE KEPT by Politifact.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/promise/175/end-the-use-of-torture/
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)And as noted on this thread, the Netherlands has a suspicion that we still at least countenance torture.
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)Evidence of U.S. Human Rights Violations
Torture and abuse of prisoners in the United States stand in contrast to international treaties, conventions, and declarations that provide basic guidelines for the treatment of prisoners.
Human rights law must be upheld by the U.S. police, court, and prison justice systems. One way to foster this change is for prisoners, their families and loved ones, and prisoner rights advocates to weave the language of international standards and treaties into their arguments for humane prison conditions and treatment of prisoners.
This report presents prisoners testimonies of torture and abuse alongside related international human rights agreements.
https://afsc.org/sites/afsc.civicactions.net/files/documents/torture_in_us_prisons.pdf
leveymg
(36,418 posts)David__77
(23,372 posts)Really?
AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)And this website put "fact" in its name!
Therefore Manning was not tortured!
Everything's great at Gitmo, where force feeding is not torture!
Decades of solitary confinement for many prisoners - not torture!
Etc.
AllINeedIsCoffee
(772 posts)Sorry that you feel entitled to your own facts, but you are not.
"some website said it was so"
None of you even want to go there, as that's the basis of most of your outrage.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)The track record of some pretend neutral facts site has absolutely nothing to say about any given statement. None whatsoever.
Each statement is true or false (or something in between) on its own. Resort to an authority doesn't change that.
"Obama ended torture" is a false statement, as demonstrated by the counter-examples immediately posted in response to your making this false claim.
Long as you think platitudes substitute for thinking, here's a useful one: Anyone who uses the ROFL smiley loses.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)which have continued under the Obama Administration. For instance, Matt Hentoff Hentoff cites reports that torture results in Afghanistan from "proxy' interrogations of Taliban suspects, including children, turned over to the Afghan gov't.: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/hentoff050813.php3#.UfMbYtg1n24
The Constitution Project cites a 2011 report from the U.N. Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA). According to the report:
"Torture was especially pervasive in Department 124, the NDS's facility for 'high-value detainees' in Kabul. Of 28 former detainees at Department 124, 26 told UNAMA they had been tortured by methods such as 'beating, suspension, and twisting and wrenching of genitals.' Seventeen of those 26 had been captured by coalition forces. Five of the 26 were children."
Hear that, President Obama? And dig this, sir: "According to The Washington Post, Department 124 is across the street from the United States' military headquarters in Kabul and was built with U.S. funds."
Torture sites paid for by your and my taxes.
Finally, in July 2011, the U.S. did ban prisoner transfers to the NDS in Kandahar. But, according to the Constitution Project, "there was evidence that the military's restrictions on transfers were not being applied to transfers by the CIA," which has a privileged place in Obama's soul.
Here's what one person transferred by the CIA told the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission, as related by the Constitution Project: "I was severely beaten by cable in the head and neck. I was shackled and they connected the shackles to an electrical current and shocked me until I was unconscious. They also beat me on the back and waist very hard ... Even my tongue is severely damaged from the electric shock."
This may help you understand why the "liberating" United States is so detested in Afghanistan.
AllINeedIsCoffee
(772 posts)think
(11,641 posts)Oh wait. They paid their $20 million dollar fine for their bribes totaling over $13 to access $730 million in New York pension funds.
My bad! That' not a reason to be concerned that these people are being paid billions to run our spy program.....
OK. back to the party! Death to Snowden!!!!!!
morningfog
(18,115 posts)think
(11,641 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)Fail.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Then you aren't against the death penalty, since life in prison is not acceptable either?
Cleita
(75,480 posts)where leaving a perp free would endanger innocent people. Otherwise an enlightened society would punish criminals in other ways but allow them to work and live outside of prison so they can support themselves and their children. In some countries in South America thieves are made to go into the army for a period of tim. Their salaries are confiscated and given to their victims.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Suppose in the US the punishment for theft was a stint in the army. You wouldn't have a problem with that?
AllINeedIsCoffee
(772 posts)If they make enough macaroni art and talk about their feelings, they might just stop raping and butchering little girls.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Maybe the Norwegian model is not for us, but neither is the Turkish prison model which is what our nation is devolving into under privatization.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)non-violent person. For one thing there should be a caveat to compensate the victim. Next one would be to make them have to put their free time into some kind of unpleasant community service like mining landfills, processing sewage or other things like that.
treestar
(82,383 posts)At least for minor offenders. Going back to school if applicable, too. Or any community service, to make people feel like they are part of society. In my opinion the reason for crime is not feeling like being a member of society and thus wanting to damage it. But with a good social safety net, too.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)in the majority of cases barbaric. Sure we don't want the likes of Charles Manson out free, but for the majority of offenders, imprisoning them is counter productive.
treestar
(82,383 posts)And nothing Snowden was charged with carries it.
AllINeedIsCoffee
(772 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Each has a 10 year maximum.
markiv
(1,489 posts)for both the USA and Russia
he returns Snowden, he's the evil KGB agant, conspiring with the worst image of the CIA
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)"enhanced interrogation" methods right before he is ushered into a Kangaroo Court.
(Note: Edited a THIRD time because I apparently can't type today.)
Cleita
(75,480 posts)I don't think things will suddenly change.
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)If Manning is to be an example I can't imagine what they have in store for Snowden.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)Wow.
RedCappedBandit
(5,514 posts)why in the hell would anyone trust a word the U.S. says?
Ichingcarpenter
(36,988 posts)I don't see much justice for individuals in this nation. I don't care for Russian, Chinese or American justice.
Anyway Russia said no to the talks and deal so the story is mute just like the OP usual banal rantings.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)If the US ever gets their hands on Snowden, he will never walk free again with absolute certainty, and will probably be executed.
ETA: The DOJ has not and would not give up their right to use the death penalty as leverage in plea negotiations.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)That would mean putting him on trial. WAY too messy.
He'd just be Baxtered.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)The internet is not telling me a definition that would make any sense.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)It happened to Cliff Baxter, who knew a little too much about Enron.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Thanks for reminding me.
Or Kellyed, as the British might say. No doubt about that one. Connelled. Probably Wellstoned. And how many don't we know?
That's not what they'd do to Snowden if they had him, however. They'd make a big old example out of him, like they're about to do with Manning. First stick him in a hole for a year or three...
treestar
(82,383 posts)it's just ridiculous. Absurd. He's too well known for "them" to get away with it. And you're watching too many movies if you think things like that happen all the time.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)and harm or death results from this, he does deserve the death penalty.