Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

liberal N proud

(60,332 posts)
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 12:32 PM Aug 2013

5 facilities with same fertilizer as West Texas blast refuse inspections

Fire Marshal: Inspections Refused Since West Blast


AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Five facilities in Texas with large quantities of the same fertilizer chemical that fueled the deadly plant explosion in West have turned away state fire marshal inspectors since the blast, investigators said Monday.


A railway operator that hauls hazardous materials across Texas was also said to have rebuffed a state request to share data since the April explosion at West Fertilizer Co. that killed 15 people and injured 200 others.

Regulators and state lawmakers at a hearing about the still-unsolved explosion were intrigued by the lack of cooperation. State Fire Marshal Chris Connealy said "well, sure" when asked whether those facilities refusing to admit inspectors raised concern.

"In their defense, they may have a very good reason," Connealy said.

There is no state fire code in Texas. The state fire marshal's office lacks the power to make unannounced inspections of local businesses, nor does the office have the authority to compel local facilities to open its doors.

http://www.mbtmag.com/news/2013/08/fire-marshal-inspections-refused-west-blast?et_cid=3446232&et_rid=82488838&type=headline
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
5 facilities with same fertilizer as West Texas blast refuse inspections (Original Post) liberal N proud Aug 2013 OP
hooray for unregulated industry! Blue_Tires Aug 2013 #1
We in the fertilizer bidness Mopar151 Aug 2013 #2
Exactly. Bidness can boom in more ways than one. n/t SwissTony Aug 2013 #3
I have to wonder about EC Aug 2013 #4
Where are these companies getting their liability insurance? Mopar151 Aug 2013 #5
Insurance?? We don't need no steenking insurance!! We'll just bullwinkle428 Aug 2013 #6

Mopar151

(9,975 posts)
2. We in the fertilizer bidness
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 01:09 PM
Aug 2013

And bidness is 'a boomin! Even in Tejas, this may prove to be a short-sighted strategy - kind of like refusing a Breathalyzer in a DWI.

EC

(12,287 posts)
4. I have to wonder about
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 02:08 PM
Aug 2013

insurance - can they get liability coverage even? Insurance to cover their loses I'd imagine would be out, but how about liability? I certainly wouldn't want to live by any of them.

Mopar151

(9,975 posts)
5. Where are these companies getting their liability insurance?
Wed Aug 28, 2013, 09:00 AM
Aug 2013

After the West Fertilizer fire/explosion, you gotta wonder.... Particularly when the owners are quite likely to be found personally liable due to gross negligence if anything goes wrong.

bullwinkle428

(20,628 posts)
6. Insurance?? We don't need no steenking insurance!! We'll just
Wed Aug 28, 2013, 09:20 AM
Aug 2013

get old "Uncle Sucker" to cover everything when, er...i mean IF something goes wrong!!!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»5 facilities with same fe...