Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why are the Tar Sands the world's dirtiest energy source? (Original Post) CaliforniaPeggy Sep 2013 OP
?! blkmusclmachine Sep 2013 #1
I don't understand your question... CaliforniaPeggy Sep 2013 #2
Because the Harper administration does not believe in climate control riverbendviewgal Sep 2013 #3
Even without the picture dipsydoodle Sep 2013 #4
Oh, ABSOLUTELY! CaliforniaPeggy Sep 2013 #5
Exactly. It's not just that the water is used. It is turned into toxic waste. SunSeeker Sep 2013 #11
They boil rocks pscot Sep 2013 #6
Sounds too pretty. Boil em by fracturing rock with gallons of toxic chemicals and then pump that Overseas Sep 2013 #19
That's fracking. Tar sand extraction is a lot worse. pscot Sep 2013 #20
THANK YOU. I just realized that I'd ranted about fracking instead of the tar sands. Overseas Sep 2013 #22
Important OP, thanks. snip* Jefferson23 Sep 2013 #7
Thank you for the link. CaliforniaPeggy Sep 2013 #9
You're very welcome. We have so many up hill battles..it is frustrating as hell. n/t Jefferson23 Sep 2013 #10
K&R - nt Ohio Joe Sep 2013 #8
And a complete waste of finite resources... Billy Love Sep 2013 #12
You got that right! CaliforniaPeggy Sep 2013 #14
Farmers needs to stop selling water to the frackers. That's the problem. Billy Love Sep 2013 #16
Wow, I didn't know that. Thank you! CaliforniaPeggy Sep 2013 #18
Stephen Harper couldn't care less about the environment. SylviaD Sep 2013 #13
I guess he hasn't realized that you can't drink money... CaliforniaPeggy Sep 2013 #15
Kick Scuba Sep 2013 #17
K&R. Tar sands should be a last resort not a quick buck venture. Overseas Sep 2013 #21
and 1 gallon of oil yields less than 1/2 a gallon of gasoline Motown_Johnny Sep 2013 #23

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
4. Even without the picture
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 06:46 PM
Sep 2013

I'd have replied that tar sands fuck water. Its not just how much water is used : its what it does to the water in the process.

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,580 posts)
5. Oh, ABSOLUTELY!
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 06:47 PM
Sep 2013

The water can never be cleaned of the chemicals used to blast the stuff out of the ground.

NEVER.

And that is completely unacceptable.

And this doesn't even begin to touch on the dangers of transporting the crap.

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
11. Exactly. It's not just that the water is used. It is turned into toxic waste.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 08:00 PM
Sep 2013

So for each gallon of tar sands oil, 3 gallons of toxic waste is created, if you don't count the oil itself as a toxin...which is a whole 'nother post.

Overseas

(12,121 posts)
19. Sounds too pretty. Boil em by fracturing rock with gallons of toxic chemicals and then pump that
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 08:56 PM
Sep 2013

waste back into the ground which has been fractured and gee whiz, sometimes those toxic chemicals leak into groundwater and poison people even though the gas industry is trying to hush that little problem up and make us think poisoning a few thousand people is worth it for lovely clean natural gas.

Overseas

(12,121 posts)
22. THANK YOU. I just realized that I'd ranted about fracking instead of the tar sands.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 09:22 PM
Sep 2013

They really are ugly and I appreciate your showing the details.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
7. Important OP, thanks. snip*
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 06:52 PM
Sep 2013

The trillion-tonne question

To begin to estimate how much fossil fuels can be burned, one has to begin with a guess about how sensitive the global climate really is to additional carbon dioxide. If you think the climate is vulnerable to even small changes in concentrations of greenhouse gases—as Hansen and others do—then we have already gone too far. Global concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere have reached 394 parts per million, up from 280 ppm before the Industrial Revolution and the highest levels seen in at least 800,000 years. Hansen's math suggests 350 ppm would be a safer level, given that with less than a degree Celsius of warming from present greenhouse gas concentrations, the world is already losing ice at an alarming rate, among other faster-than-expected climate changes.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=tar-sands-and-keystone-xl-pipeline-impact-on-global-warming

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,580 posts)
9. Thank you for the link.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 06:55 PM
Sep 2013

It's always good to have solid scientific evidence along with the sensational stuff to get people's attention.

I have true fears for the future of our planet.

Not enough folks in positions of power and influence are listening...

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,580 posts)
14. You got that right!
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 08:07 PM
Sep 2013

Once that water is used for fracking, it can never be cleaned.

And when we're already facing water shortages.

 

Billy Love

(117 posts)
16. Farmers needs to stop selling water to the frackers. That's the problem.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 08:15 PM
Sep 2013

Farmers should be banned from selling water to oil & gas companies, and tell the oil & gas industry to import water from the ocean, and the expel it up their rear end.

My governor is an idiot, and a Democrat. We call him Frackenlooper for a reason.

I'm going to write a letter telling him to put the fracked water in his beer and try SELLING that to the public.

John Hickenlooper owns and operates the Wynkoop Brewery Company - right now in a blind trust while he's a governor

If the farmers need money, we can put aside major bucks to help subsidize their flagging crops as long as they refuse to sell their water to the frackers.

One of the Colorado's rep's vacation home was fracked - and he got PISSED and opened an investigation - found out the well was an illegal one and had it shut down, but is looking for repartitions, but I am hoping Polis will learn this lesson and introduce a bill banning fracking for good.





CaliforniaPeggy

(149,580 posts)
18. Wow, I didn't know that. Thank you!
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 08:20 PM
Sep 2013

I think your ideas have a lot of merit.

Even Dem governors can be idiots on various topics.

SylviaD

(721 posts)
13. Stephen Harper couldn't care less about the environment.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 08:06 PM
Sep 2013

From what I've read he is an arch-conservative who instigated a takeover of the traditional Canadian Conservative party - from the right-wing fringe party he used to lead.

So this character, Harper, an enemy of Canadian Conservatism because it wasn't right-wing enough for him, is now leading the country. He probably sings "drill baby drill" in the shower. What does he care about fresh water or the dangers of refining bitumen? So long as the oil profits continue to flow north!!!

Overseas

(12,121 posts)
21. K&R. Tar sands should be a last resort not a quick buck venture.
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 09:20 PM
Sep 2013

These are even dirtier than our current petroleum drilling projects which are still too messy and wasteful.

Tar sands should be second to last resort. AFTER we have tried to economize and use existing oil much more efficiently.

Fracking is so very destructive it should be a last resort, not a rush project like it has been.

We should have already tried every bit of waste reduction technology and energy conservation technology we have before we take one step toward fracturing the shale under our country and in the oceans.

We should have tried to increase the efficiency of our use of regular petroleum and poured a trillion into alternative energy before we even begin with fracking to get natural gas.

It just isn't right that we waste so much of the old fossil fuels before we go disfiguring our land and using up our precious water to keep our wasteful lifestyle going.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
23. and 1 gallon of oil yields less than 1/2 a gallon of gasoline
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 09:24 PM
Sep 2013

So, in rough terms, one gallon of gasoline from that stuff requires ~7 gallons of fresh water be polluted.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why are the Tar Sands the...