General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat was the last presidential administration to not undertake major military action?
Military action has taken place in almost every recent U.S. presidential administration I can recall:
Obama - Drone strikes, military operation in Libya against Gaddafi
Bush II - war in Afghanistan, war in Iraq
Clinton - military operations in Bosnia, Kosovo, and also the cruise missile strikes on Afghan and Sudan targets
Bush I - military operation in Panama, and the Gulf War
Reagan - Grenada, airstrike against Libya
So, what was the last presidential administration to not undertake major military action? Carter? Ford?
Operation Eagle Claw (to rescue the American hostages in Iran) did take place under Carter's administration, but that was a justified military action in my opinion.

H2O Man
(76,631 posts)Cuban missile crisis
Response to H2O Man (Reply #1)
Awknid This message was self-deleted by its author.
PlanetaryOrbit
(155 posts)Right?
gopiscrap
(24,320 posts)But your assertion on Kennedy wouldn't surprise me
Vietnam <COUGH>
Rhiannon12866
(232,369 posts)
Uncle Joe
(61,428 posts)can't think of anything.
If you added every conflict the U.S. has been since its' inception I believe it's well over 200 years of war.
Thanks for the thread, PlanetaryOrbit.
bobclark86
(1,415 posts)We were still in Vietnam and Cambodia under Ford.
The last one was James Garfield, who died in 1881 after 200 days in office. He did damn near jump into a war in South America, though.
Link to U.S. military operations
BlueCheese
(2,522 posts)Ford inherited the Vietnam War, which also ended during his presidency.
bobclark86
(1,415 posts)sending in troops to help evacuate Cambodia and Vietnam, as well as seize a merchant vessel in Cambodia.
The Mayaguez Incident
More Americans died there than in Benghazi.
BlueCheese
(2,522 posts)Before that you have a few interesting cases. I'm pretty sure William Henry Harrison never got around to starting a war.