General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsConservatives using the "Asian-Americans are successful" argument
I've noticed that some conservatives in recent years have been trying to use the success of Asian-Americans as an argument in favor of conservatism. Usually the argument goes something like this:
"Asian-Americans are a racial minority, yet they are successful, more so than African-Americans or Hispanics. Therefore, 1) Asian-Americans work hard and therefore succeed, and 2) African-Americans and Hispanics don't work hard and therefore don't succeed, therefore it's about diligence vs. laziness, not about race or circumstances, blah blah blah blah blah."
Without diminishing the success that Asian-Americans have had, or the discrimination that they've faced, how exactly does one go about debunking this sort of logic?

MisterP
(23,730 posts)FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Had Obama's father stayed in the US, he would have been a member of this minority.
The West Indian community also attains an economic status above the average for various white ethnic groups.
Blue_Tires
(57,596 posts)Sociology is complex, and proper debunking takes a fair amount of multi-layered research...By the time you've dug up all the scholarly journals, studies and statistics, the other guy has moved on to something else...
It's not worth all that effort to win a argument on the innernette
JI7
(91,773 posts)there it is.
PlanetaryOrbit
(155 posts)The thread isn't about who voted for whom.
JI7
(91,773 posts)Wounded Bear
(61,728 posts)They're doing it to justify their own racist tendencies and feel better about themselves when they block gov't help for minorities.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Without even reading the article I can smell that shit a mile away. They've successfully eliminated part of the VRA and they've been trying on affirmative action as well.
If the Republicans thought they could get away with it they'd try to make the argument that a African American president is proof enough for the elimination of affirmative action. It wouldn't surprise me a bit.
Bunnahabhain
(857 posts)I mean, it's factual that the majority of different Asian American populations experience "success" at higher rates than the general population. It is factual they are a minority, in fact one of the smallest minorities, in the US. The action is in thinking about why this might be, why it might be factual that African Americans and Hispanics experience success at lower rates than the general population, and what steps can be taken to change this situation. You do not argue against the facts but rather steer the conversation to why these facts exist.
Skittles
(163,413 posts)yes INDEED
Throd
(7,208 posts)The first generation came from Vietnam to a strange land with practically nothing, yet many of their kids went to UC Irvine.
Monster_Mash
(24 posts)... even to what many would consider an extreme.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)No references to culture or not working hard enough when referring to whites. That,s the racism in these type of discussions
Bunnahabhain
(857 posts)and it rather misses the point I was raising...which I'm used to.
Heather MC
(8,084 posts)their views on Immigration effects all immigrants not just hispanics.
Their views on women's healthcare rights effects more than just white women that they want to keep continuously pregnant so the pure white race doesn't become the minority.
And their are quite a few gay Asians who desire to be married.
Their statement about Asians as hardworking is actually very racist and not a compliment because they see Asians as one thing. Retail Small business owners.
I am sure it never Occurrs them why they work so hard, is because they have families they are fighting to care for just like all other Americans.
Oh and they dont really consider the True Amerikanns either.
I hate to stereo type A Republican. but it is ok some of my best friends are repugs lol
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)they're often middle-class in their own countries, which have higher savings rates than the U.S. (not difficult). They come here not to make better lives for themselves but for their children, who (they believe) will benefit from upward mobility here.
Shankapotomus
(4,840 posts)American culture (or, historically, Western European culture) exploits (exploited) different cultures in different ways. As as a result of those varying degrees of exploitation, racist assessments have been drawn and reinforced. Asian culture was never given as negative an assessment in the collective conscious by the ruling White culture as African American culture. And so the ruling white assessment doesn't have the same impact on Asians as it does on African Americans. That's not to say Asians do not suffer from racism. The assessment is different, however, and therefore the impact will be in different areas. Maybe for Asians it won't be in the job market but will arise under different circumstances, such as during war time.
But white culture is not the God-given assessor of other cultures. The problem is not that cultures are different. The problem is that it is typically white culture that keeps doing the assessing of other cultures under their rules, under their paradigms. That is part of the racism.
The Straight Story
(48,121 posts)How can we blame Obama for the unemployment rate if Asians are so successful, maybe them good ole boys are just dumb and lazy eh?
uponit7771
(92,730 posts)...Crow now that's the easy one.
Also not all cultures are subjected to racism at the same levels...by the SBA Asian wealth in America is looked at as the same level as whites in America
http://smallbusiness.foxbusiness.com/finance-accounting/2013/04/30/study-women-minorities-get-fewer-business-loans/
Level of startup capital is a strong predictor of business success, the SBA wrote, referencing two earlier studies on the topic.
According to the SBA, Asians were looked at separately from African American and Hispanic business owners in the study, because their levels of wealth are similar to white business owners.
An earlier study mentioned found assets are the single most important factor in determining business creation, and explain why African Americans and Hispanics create businesses less often than whites in the U.S.
dkf
(37,305 posts)The Chinese Exclusion Act was repealed by the 1943 Magnuson Act, during a time when China had become an ally of the U.S. against Japan in World War II. The Magnuson Act permitted Chinese nationals already residing in the country to become naturalized citizens and stop hiding from the threat of deportation. It also allowed a national quota of 105 Chinese immigrants per year. Large scale Chinese immigration did not occur until the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965. Despite the fact that the exclusion act was repealed in 1943, the law in California prohibiting Chinese people from marrying whites was not repealed until 1948.[19][20] Other states had such laws until 1967,[21] when the United States Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Loving v. Virginia that anti-miscegenation laws are unconstitutional.
Even today, although all its constituent sections have long been repealed, Chapter 7 of Title 8 of the United States Code is headed "Exclusion of Chinese."[22] It is the only chapter of the 15 chapters in Title 8 (Aliens and Nationality) that is completely focused on a specific nationality or ethnic group.
On June 18, 2012, the United States House of Representatives passed a resolution introduced by Congresswoman Judy Chu, that formally expresses the regret of the House of Representatives for the Chinese Exclusion Act, which imposed almost total restrictions on Chinese immigration and naturalization and denied Chinese-Americans basic freedoms because of their ethnicity.[23] The resolution had been approved by the U.S. Senate in October 2011.[24]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Exclusion_Act
Japanese American internment was the World War II internment in "War Relocation Camps" of about 120,000 people of Japanese heritage who lived on the Pacific coast of the United States. The U.S. government ordered the internment in 1942, shortly after Imperial Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor.[2][3] The internment of Japanese Americans was applied unequally as a geographic matter: all who lived on the West Coast were interned, while in Hawaii, where 150,000-plus Japanese Americans comprised over one-third of the population, only 1,200[4] to 1,800 were interned. Sixty-two percent of the internees were American citizens.[5][6]
President Franklin D. Roosevelt authorized the internment with Executive Order 9066, issued February 19, 1942, which allowed local military commanders to designate "military areas" as "exclusion zones," from which "any or all persons may be excluded." This power was used to declare that all people of Japanese ancestry were excluded from the entire Pacific coast, including all of California and much of Oregon, Washington and Arizona, except for those in internment camps.[7] In 1944, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the exclusion orders.[8] The Court limited its decision to the validity of the exclusion orders, adding, "The provisions of other orders requiring persons of Japanese ancestry to report to assembly centers and providing for the detention of such persons in assembly and relocation centers were separate, and their validity is not in issue in this proceeding."[9] The United States Census Bureau assisted the internment efforts by providing confidential neighborhood information on Japanese Americans. The Bureau's role was denied for decades, but was finally proven in 2007.[10][11]
In 1980, President Jimmy Carter conducted an investigation to determine whether putting Japanese Americans into internment camps was justified well enough by the government. He appointed the Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians (CWRIC) to investigate the camps. The commission's report, named Personal Justice Denied, found little evidence of Japanese disloyalty at the time and recommended the government pay reparations to the survivors. They formed a payment of $20,000 to each individual internment camp survivor.
In 1988, Congress passed and President Ronald Reagan signed legislation that apologized for the internment on behalf of the U.S. government. The legislation said that government actions were based on "race prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership".[12] The U.S. government eventually disbursed more than $1.6 billion in reparations to Japanese Americans who had been interned and their heirs.[13]
Of 127,000 Japanese Americans living in the continental United States at the time of the Pearl Harbor attack, 112,000 resided on the West Coast.[14] About 80,000 were nisei (literal translation: "second generation"; Japanese people born in the United States and holding American citizenship) and sansei (literal translation: "third generation"; the sons or daughters of nisei). The rest were issei (literal translation: "first generation"; immigrants born in Japan who were ineligible for U.S. citizenship).[15]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_American_internment
uponit7771
(92,730 posts)... over discrimination like the fed did for hundreds of years
JustAnotherGen
(34,678 posts)But I've never seen dfk show just without guile or question empathy for black Americans . . . so let it go.
kalisto2010
(64 posts)However they paid less than a White person with less education. They're still discriminated against, it's just their grievances aren't a national story, which they should be.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)and the highest test scores and stuff.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Asian immigrants would have to have the money to travel to the US, too, and are likely therefore to be the more successful at home to begin with.
I had one conservative claim that Haitians who migrate to the US do better than American Blacks, as a way of trying to argue that it's our system that fails African Americans. Not sure where he got those statistics now.
gopiscrap
(24,320 posts)and those who don't have to worry about where they will receive food, shelter, medical attention etc are much more likely to succeed regardless of race. As a nation we don't value education.