General Discussion

MarianJack

(10,237 posts) Thu Oct 17, 2013, 02:44 PM Oct 2013

GOOD NEWS!

My wife was recalled to her job today after the Feds reopened. Our dear Governor LePage didn't have to lay her office off, but he did so in a worthless show of teabagger solidarity. We'll continue to remember this as we work for Mike Michaud to send his temper-tantruming ass back to Florida next year.

PEACE!

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

GOOD NEWS! (Original Post) MarianJack Oct 2013 OP

Is LePage even running again? sharp_stick Oct 2013 #1

Yes, he's running and... MarianJack Oct 2013 #2

Oh God another vote split sharp_stick Oct 2013 #3

I don't think it'll work this time. MarianJack Oct 2013 #4

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)

1. Is LePage even running again?

Reply to MarianJack (Original post)

Thu Oct 17, 2013, 03:24 PM

Oct 2013

I can't imagine that stooge pulling off anywhere near the support he'd need.

MarianJack

(10,237 posts)

2. Yes, he's running and...

Reply to sharp_stick (Reply #1)

Thu Oct 17, 2013, 05:55 PM

Oct 2013

...he's counting on Elliot Cuttler to pull enough support from Mike Michaud to allow him to sneak into office again. Yuck & Yikes!

PEACE!

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)

3. Oh God another vote split

Reply to MarianJack (Reply #2)

Thu Oct 17, 2013, 06:52 PM

Oct 2013

I love it when the pukes do it but damn that pisses me off when it's our side.

MarianJack

(10,237 posts)

4. I don't think it'll work this time.

Reply to sharp_stick (Reply #3)

Fri Oct 18, 2013, 07:31 AM

Oct 2013

Mike Michaud is a stronger candidate than Libby Mitchell was (although she is a GREAT woman!). Libby ran out of money about 2 weeks before the election and went into free fall from her inability to answer the shitload of negative attacks that came her way. She ran on our clean election laws while Cutler was able to buy a 2nd place finish and LePage got an avalanche of out of state teabagger money. I don't think that Mike Michaud will put himself in either position.

PEACE!

Reply to this discussion