General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNY Times Book Review Scorches Matthews' "Tip and the Gipper"
More: http://www.mediaite.com/online/ny-times-book-review-scorches-chris-matthews-tip-and-the-gipper/
Greenberg goes on to debunk the notion that Reagan and ONeill put politics aside at 6 oclock to make compromise deals that would help both Democrats and Republicans. Its a nice idea for a book, he writes, if only it were true. He questions the false symmetry Matthews sets up between the two men, who he says were not on the same level in terms of political influence. Mocking Matthews emphasis on Reagans Irishness, Greenberg concludes, He has a fine appreciation of blarney.
monmouth3
(3,871 posts)DonViejo
(60,536 posts)the Mediaite report of it. Here's a link to the full NYT review:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/24/books/review/tip-and-the-gipper-by-chris-matthews.html?_r=0
BeyondGeography
(39,345 posts)Why can't the Times always be so clear-eyed? Matthews had a front-row seat for a political play that went right over his head.
Thanks for posting.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)hatrack
(59,574 posts)Matthews also misreads Reagan in retailing the tired Washington canard that his success lay in his affability. Many insiders did indeed swoon over the presidents ready charm, but his election depended just as crucially on his very public meanness, his zest for the punitive the vows to crack down on domestic spending, welfare queens and the Evil Empire. An account of Reagans triumph that locates the key in his Hollywood smile cannot explain the victories that the conservative movement continued to enjoy after his exit.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)They knew Reagan was a mean shit, and they liked him for it.
warrprayer
(4,734 posts)... is embarrassing.
Rex
(65,616 posts)then go on to news shows and get treated like experts when they lie their asses off or are just completely wrong? People like Matthews are part of the problem and not part of the solution and never will be.