General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSuspect’s lawyer blames rape victim’s family for ‘setting in motion’ her suicide
By David Edwards
Wednesday, January 8, 2014 10:39 EST
The lawyer for a teen accused of sexually assaulting a 15-year-old girl who killed herself in 2012 said this week that the victims family was to blame for her suicide.
The parents of Audrie Pott have filed a wrongful death suit against the families of three boys who were accused of sexually assaulting their daughter at a party in 2012. Audrie Pott woke up after a party at a girlfriends house to find messages scrawled on her partially naked body. The boys who allegedly sexually assaulted her were also accused of taking photos and showing them to other students on campus.
A week later, the humiliated teen hung herself in her mothers home.
In court papers filed on Monday, Philip Pereira, the lawyer for one of the accused boys, pointed the finger of blame at Potts family, writing that the suicide was set in motion years before the events alleged.
Pereira claimed that the factors culminated immediately before the suicide with an altercation between Audrie Pott and two of her friends who are not named as defendants in this matter.
The attorney also asserted that Lawrence Pott, who was named as a plaintiff along with mother Sheila Pott, had no standing in the case because he was not Audries biological father.
It sounds to me that much of whats being raised is a lot of irrelevant smoke screen to attempt to get away from the main issue of whether or not the people being sued are responsible in any way for the loss of this child, Golden Gate Law School professor Peter Keane told the San Jose Mercury News.
It doesnt matter whether biologically it was his child, even if you can provide by DNA that it is, Keane explained. Under California law, a child with parents who were cohabitating at the time, if the father holds himself out to be the father, he is by law that childs father.
In a statement, the Potts attorney, Robert Allard, said that the parents of the accused should be responsible for their actions.
Its no wonder how this all happened, the statement said. When you have a coddled child whose parents refuse to hold him responsible for his actions, you will eventually be dealing with a tragedy.
What this young man did was indefensible and the fact that these outlandish statements have now been made tell us that the only way that he and his family will learn their lesson is through a jury verdict, Allard wrote.
A foundation created by the Pott family has spearheaded legislation for harsh penalties against cyberbullying. The next court date in the wrongful death lawsuit is scheduled for Jan. 28 in San Jose.
Watch this video from KRON, broadcast Jan. 7, 2013.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/01/08/suspects-lawyer-blames-rape-victims-family-for-setting-in-motion-her-suicide/
###
Full article posted with the permission of Raw Story
BainsBane
(53,026 posts)by someone who said if young girls feel shame as a result of being ogled by adult men, it's not the fault of the predator but their families who taught them that sex is shameful. So an old man molests a child. If that bothers you it's only because you were too upright in the first place.
cinnabonbon
(860 posts)It drives the hurt in deeper.
On the other hand, I can't wait for this law to come into effect. We need it.
dickthegrouch
(3,172 posts)Requiring 12 people to agree on a Jury is an extremely high bar.
The law in the UK is for 9 of the 12 jury members to agree for a conviction to occur.
These kinds of subversive tactics are simply to try to undermine one weak juror in order to get the alleged miscreants off.
Dr. Strange
(25,917 posts)why then do we have WAY more people in prison than the UK?
dickthegrouch
(3,172 posts)Where the alleged offender is presented with too much alleged evidence to argue with and a public defender.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)anyone to be a scumbag.