Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

warrior1

(12,325 posts)
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 02:13 PM Jan 2014

Yes! N.J. Senate Majority Leader Says Criminal Charges May Come In Bridge Scandal

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/nj-dem-criminal-charges-possible-bridge



New Jersey State Senate Majority Leader Loretta Weinberg (D) said Wednesday she thinks criminal charges may come in the growing scandal over last September's lane closures on the George Washington Bridge.

Weinberg's comments came after TPM and other news outlets obtained emails and other communications that showed one of Gov. Chris Christie's (R) closest aides was involved in the discussions of the lane closures weeks before they took place.

Democrats, including Weinberg, have alleged that the closures were ordered in an effort to snarl traffic in nearby Fort Lee, N.J. in retaliation for the Democratic mayor there not endorsing Christie's reelection bid.

When asked if she thought criminal charges were possible based on the new revelations, Weinberg replied: "Yes."


snip
79 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yes! N.J. Senate Majority Leader Says Criminal Charges May Come In Bridge Scandal (Original Post) warrior1 Jan 2014 OP
Should be a back up JustAnotherGen Jan 2014 #1
Wonder if any money was spent on the bogus study? nt okaawhatever Jan 2014 #6
I don't think we are going to find any money spent on it JustAnotherGen Jan 2014 #7
that's what I was wondering. If they either moved money around to look like they had asked for a okaawhatever Jan 2014 #8
One report said $60,000 was approved by Christie louis-t Jan 2014 #11
Hmmm...I wonder if that qualifies for fraud. I doubt it because if none had been spent there wasn't okaawhatever Jan 2014 #12
Found it. In email from Wildstein to Kelly. louis-t Jan 2014 #13
thanks for that. Even if the money isn't fraud I wonder if Christie approving it for Springfield okaawhatever Jan 2014 #14
I'm wondering if the 'approval of funds' louis-t Jan 2014 #16
What would that study have to do with Fort Lee and the GW bridge? pnwmom Jan 2014 #27
That was for a traffic study in Morris County, almost 20 miles from the bridge George II Jan 2014 #19
Actually Union County, but.... Laxman Jan 2014 #38
The study of traffic patterns cover story is bogus Botany Jan 2014 #23
Hmmm, this IS starting to look interesting. Ligyron Jan 2014 #2
MJ is reporting Baroni and Wildstein both have retained criminal defense attorneys herding cats Jan 2014 #3
Don't gloat just yet NJ politics is corrupted on both sides the democrats control the legislature bigdarryl Jan 2014 #4
I agree JustAnotherGen Jan 2014 #9
I'm not confident Obama will direct Holder in this because bigdarryl Jan 2014 #43
That I remember JustAnotherGen Jan 2014 #49
Hopefully there will be hundreds of civil suits filed, too. George II Jan 2014 #5
Hope there is enough popcorn randr Jan 2014 #10
This is Christie, the buck already stopped about 2 levels below him. George II Jan 2014 #39
Enough popcorn for Christie? lol grahamhgreen Jan 2014 #68
I am about to expode randr Jan 2014 #70
Mark my words... TRoN33 Jan 2014 #15
In an informed and smart world neffernin Jan 2014 #17
A recall would be next to impossible tabbycat31 Jan 2014 #25
The page on NJ state website to the recall election petition is GONE... Tx4obama Jan 2014 #46
GOP will cry "WITCH HUNT" Iliyah Jan 2014 #18
TeaFreepers hate Christie as much or more than progressives FrodosPet Jan 2014 #31
Folks, no offense, but to me this sounds as ludicrous as the people screaming BENGHAZI... Demo_Chris Jan 2014 #20
Except that it was done purposely, with malice, as retribution vs. a political opponent nt LiberalEsto Jan 2014 #22
So? Think this through... Demo_Chris Jan 2014 #28
You presume to be able to read my mind LiberalEsto Jan 2014 #32
Getting into criminal charges over a traffic snarl will be perceived by voters as petty OmahaBlueDog Jan 2014 #33
So deliberately blocking 2 traffic lanes for 4 days as a political vendetta is not a crime? yellowcanine Jan 2014 #53
Is it a crime? Probably. Does it rise to the level of impeachable? Probably not. OmahaBlueDog Jan 2014 #62
Hmm. Criminal charges for the aides who ordered it is not impeachment. yellowcanine Jan 2014 #64
Nope. Aides are expendable. OmahaBlueDog Jan 2014 #72
Right. But you turned the discussion about criminal charges into impeachment. yellowcanine Jan 2014 #74
I'm saying he won't be impeached. An aide or two will be sacrificed. OmahaBlueDog Jan 2014 #75
Got that part. Your original comment was questioning the wisdom of a criminal investigation yellowcanine Jan 2014 #77
True. It's NJs justice system. Personally, I think the courts have better things to do. OmahaBlueDog Jan 2014 #78
That's my read on it as well... Demo_Chris Jan 2014 #58
No evidence of a traffic study. So it is politically motivated blocking traffic lanes for 4 days. yellowcanine Jan 2014 #52
Speak for yourself whopis01 Jan 2014 #54
Yes -- this was terrible -- affecting thousands of thousands of lives for days and causing Arugula Latte Jan 2014 #67
Oh really! Who produced such a study anyway? Bandit Jan 2014 #24
I am not disputing any of that... Demo_Chris Jan 2014 #26
Maybe the missing four-year-old girls parents who couldn't get justiceischeap Jan 2014 #29
If you could show a direct correlation to loss of life or injury, you might have a point OmahaBlueDog Jan 2014 #34
In another thread about this, they're talking about a 91 year old woman justiceischeap Jan 2014 #35
The death of the 91 year old woman will be difficult to overcome rpannier Jan 2014 #48
People are going to look at that and say "Yeah, but she was 91" OmahaBlueDog Jan 2014 #50
"this will be forgotten in 6 months." Wishful thinking. This will drag Christie down. yellowcanine Jan 2014 #56
Wishful thinking, IMO OmahaBlueDog Jan 2014 #61
You think the death of a 91 year old woman... Demo_Chris Jan 2014 #60
False comparison. This was (apparently) specifically ordered by an aide. yellowcanine Jan 2014 #65
We will see. It is better that Christie lose now. We don't want to face him in '16... Demo_Chris Jan 2014 #66
As I said rpannier Jan 2014 #73
If there was no injury it was just dumb luck. "Reckless endangerment" comes to mind. yellowcanine Jan 2014 #55
Or the elderly woman who died. nt tblue37 Jan 2014 #45
Um...you are wrong. The worst emails haven't come out yet, nor the emails from the coverup.... msanthrope Jan 2014 #30
I agree the whole thing seems a bit petulant. BlueEye Jan 2014 #42
Wishful thinking on your part. A woman died. morningfog Jan 2014 #57
One Thing in Jersey We hate More than anything else... imthevicar Jan 2014 #21
And, it looks like your fucking governor/and/or his inside staff Cha Jan 2014 #36
This is Just a distraction. imthevicar Jan 2014 #79
Don't count your chickens ... bucolic_frolic Jan 2014 #37
Fuck them!! They need to stand by their criminal asshole governor! That's who they supported! Own it Liberal_Stalwart71 Jan 2014 #40
Bridgegazi bucolic_frolic Jan 2014 #41
What is the Difference Between Chris Christie And Richard Nixon? DallasNE Jan 2014 #44
Disagree rpannier Jan 2014 #47
It Was A Joke DallasNE Jan 2014 #63
A woman DIED because the ambulance coming to possibly save her workinclasszero Jan 2014 #51
Negligent homicide? grahamhgreen Jan 2014 #69
GOOD. n/t cinnabonbon Jan 2014 #59
Why would the HEAD OF THE PORT AUTHORITY even CONSIDER such a STUPID request by a ChristyCream aide? vkkv Jan 2014 #71
So will Fox cover Bridgeghazi 24/7 then? Or at all? nt valerief Jan 2014 #76

JustAnotherGen

(31,798 posts)
1. Should be a back up
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 02:16 PM
Jan 2014

To federal charges. I know you are hot on this! Interstate Commerce.

I think that's what Patrick Foye was getting at it . . . and -

This study? It doesn't exist. If it doesn't - shouldn't the NY P.A. team have access to it?

JustAnotherGen

(31,798 posts)
7. I don't think we are going to find any money spent on it
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 02:27 PM
Jan 2014

And if there was money - they didn't have the authority

okaawhatever

(9,461 posts)
8. that's what I was wondering. If they either moved money around to look like they had asked for a
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 02:31 PM
Jan 2014

study after they were caught. They should have realized if they were going to use a study as an excuse they'd have to have some documents proving the study existed. That's what I wondered.

okaawhatever

(9,461 posts)
12. Hmmm...I wonder if that qualifies for fraud. I doubt it because if none had been spent there wasn't
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 02:48 PM
Jan 2014

fraud or intent to defraud. Christie could claim they were actually going to do the study one day. I hope someone spent a little bit of that money because if the survey didn't take place it's fraud.

okaawhatever

(9,461 posts)
14. thanks for that. Even if the money isn't fraud I wonder if Christie approving it for Springfield
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 03:03 PM
Jan 2014

makes me wonder if that's one of the ways he rewards his supporters. I see if was to get certified as renewable under some green program. I wonder if there was a political nature to who was awarded money for these types of things.

louis-t

(23,284 posts)
16. I'm wondering if the 'approval of funds'
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 03:23 PM
Jan 2014

wasn't something done after the fact to disguise the retaliatory action.

Laxman

(2,419 posts)
38. Actually Union County, but....
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 08:48 PM
Jan 2014

still not near the GW Bridge. I don't think that grant had anything to do with this.

Botany

(70,477 posts)
23. The study of traffic patterns cover story is bogus
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 05:00 PM
Jan 2014

How do you study traffic patterns when you have no traffic.

Somebody might gonna cut a deal to save their ass and then the will sing like a little bird
and @ that point Christie will be in deep shit. (I think that is the case but I might be wrong :rofl

herding cats

(19,558 posts)
3. MJ is reporting Baroni and Wildstein both have retained criminal defense attorneys
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 02:21 PM
Jan 2014

At the bottom of this paragraph you'll find where they mention it.

Why is this political? Soon after the traffic jam, rumors emerged that the Port Authority closed the bridge lanes as political retribution against Fort Lee Mayor Mark Sokolich, a Democrat who endorsed Gov. Chris Christie's opponent in the 2013 gubernatorial campaign. As news outlets and New Jersey Democrats dug deeper into the circumstances of the bridge incident, they eventually connected the lane closures to two Port Authority officials with close ties to Christie: Bill Baroni, the deputy executive director of the agency, and David Wildstein, its director of interstate capital projects. Baroni and Wildstein have since resigned, and both men have retained criminal defense attorneys.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/01/chris-christie-bridge-traffic-jam-emails
 

bigdarryl

(13,190 posts)
4. Don't gloat just yet NJ politics is corrupted on both sides the democrats control the legislature
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 02:24 PM
Jan 2014

But I don't trust them either.They might make some kind of a deal with the Christie Administration on having someone in his cabinet take the fall for everything in this scandal and making some kind of statement saying the Governor wasn't involved at all. Even though he might have been. That's NJ politics for you

JustAnotherGen

(31,798 posts)
9. I agree
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 02:31 PM
Jan 2014

But Foye (Cuomo's guy) at the P.A. - he is pissed. I'd like to see this out of our hands and in the hands of the Feds. What say you?

 

bigdarryl

(13,190 posts)
43. I'm not confident Obama will direct Holder in this because
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 10:19 PM
Jan 2014

I honestly think Obama likes Christie as a friend.You got to remember he didnt even come to NJ to campaign for the democrat nominee for Governor

JustAnotherGen

(31,798 posts)
49. That I remember
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 08:59 AM
Jan 2014

But I think with VA in the mix and Christie 'unbeatable' - he did what was the politically expedient thing to do. Me? I know I did the absolute best I could to get Buono elected.

Funny some guy who had called into Ask The Governor called into Gearhart this morning and said look - the guy lied to me. And this isn't the first time.

Maybe now people will mea culpa over not holding his feet to the fire on the 'special election'.

Most out of state and a shitload of people IN state were not (deliberately ignorant perhaps?) aware that the NJ Legislature in 1924 actually wrote into law and made possible for Christie to have held the election on the same day as the Governor's race. He just chose to not have folk just go press "D" at the polls. . . because he would have lost from the sheer volume created by Booker's 'star power'.

 

TRoN33

(769 posts)
15. Mark my words...
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 03:19 PM
Jan 2014

If the scandal investigation isn't a success but without doubt New Jersey people would scream for the recall election against Christie.

tabbycat31

(6,336 posts)
25. A recall would be next to impossible
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 06:13 PM
Jan 2014

IIRC you need 25% of all REGISTERED VOTERS to sign the recall petitions. 2013's turnout was 37% give or take.

Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
46. The page on NJ state website to the recall election petition is GONE...
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 11:55 PM
Jan 2014

... if you click on the recall election petition link on the link below says:

Page Not Found

The page you have requested cannot be displayed because it does not exist, has been moved, or the server has been instructed not to let you view it.


http://nj.gov/state/elections/candidate-recall-election-process.html
http://nj.gov/state/elections/recall-election/recall-election-petition-090109.pdf

FrodosPet

(5,169 posts)
31. TeaFreepers hate Christie as much or more than progressives
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 06:43 PM
Jan 2014

They consider him a RINO.

"Everybody Hates Chris(tie)"

 

Demo_Chris

(6,234 posts)
20. Folks, no offense, but to me this sounds as ludicrous as the people screaming BENGHAZI...
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 04:24 PM
Jan 2014

It's a traffic study. It's not bringing down the Governor or impacting a thing, and trying to stretch it into something it's not is just a bit silly.

In my opinion.

 

Demo_Chris

(6,234 posts)
28. So? Think this through...
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 06:24 PM
Jan 2014

If it was a Democrat that did this you wouldn't care. If it was Obama or someone like that you'd praise him for playing tough politics. I know I would. Hell, I would be fucking THRILLED if Obama actually did something like this rather than playing the Great Appeaser, and I suspect you would as well.

You think GOP voters are any different? It's not lying us into a war (which didn't cost Bush the election) or Benghazi (which didn't seem to hurt Obama even though it had just happened), it's a politically motivated traffic study. Christie WANTS the media to bring it up.

 

LiberalEsto

(22,845 posts)
32. You presume to be able to read my mind
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 06:58 PM
Jan 2014

If it were a Democrat, I WOULD care. It's wrong, no matter who does it.

FYI I was a newspaper reporter in NJ for many years.

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
33. Getting into criminal charges over a traffic snarl will be perceived by voters as petty
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 08:03 PM
Jan 2014

I think members of both parties have better things to do.

yellowcanine

(35,698 posts)
53. So deliberately blocking 2 traffic lanes for 4 days as a political vendetta is not a crime?
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 10:01 AM
Jan 2014

If an private individual did it it would be, so why is it not when a governor's aide does it?

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
62. Is it a crime? Probably. Does it rise to the level of impeachable? Probably not.
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 11:57 AM
Jan 2014

It reflects badly on Christie, but it won't get him removed from office.

yellowcanine

(35,698 posts)
64. Hmm. Criminal charges for the aides who ordered it is not impeachment.
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 12:38 PM
Jan 2014

Moved the goal posts a bit, don't you think?

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
72. Nope. Aides are expendable.
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 05:08 PM
Jan 2014

Poindexted, McFarlane, and North all took the fall. Reagan was never impeached.

yellowcanine

(35,698 posts)
74. Right. But you turned the discussion about criminal charges into impeachment.
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 10:27 PM
Jan 2014

So I am really not sure what your point is here.

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
75. I'm saying he won't be impeached. An aide or two will be sacrificed.
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 12:09 AM
Jan 2014

Let's see where all of this is in March.

yellowcanine

(35,698 posts)
77. Got that part. Your original comment was questioning the wisdom of a criminal investigation
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 12:29 AM
Jan 2014

-of apparent crimes. Strange.

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
78. True. It's NJs justice system. Personally, I think the courts have better things to do.
Fri Jan 10, 2014, 01:17 AM
Jan 2014

Again -- let's see where all of this is in March.

 

Demo_Chris

(6,234 posts)
58. That's my read on it as well...
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 10:42 AM
Jan 2014

The Social Conservative faction within the GOP definitely hates Christie with a hot HOT hate, so I suppose there is some possibility that this will have some long term impact, but at this point I continue to see it as a bit silly.

But time will tell. I've been wrong before.

yellowcanine

(35,698 posts)
52. No evidence of a traffic study. So it is politically motivated blocking traffic lanes for 4 days.
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 09:57 AM
Jan 2014

No study, no notification of police, fire depts and the public with signs and through media as well as a dedicated radio channel. All of these major commuter routes have elaborate plans in place for scheduled lane closures weeks in advance (usually at least a month in the DC area, not sure about NY Port Authority but this is one of the busiest bridges in the world. Puts things in a little different light, more along the lines of political dirty tricks and thuggery - note, it was not the mayor of Fort Lee who suffered because of this - it was ordinary folks just trying to get to work, school, appointments, etc. This is abuse of power and if Christie ordered it he should be impeached. It is one thing to punish a political opponent. And you are dead wrong about the fall out from this. Christie has already messed up by making light of it and not getting to the bottom of it immediately. As for GOP voters - my bet is that Christie just lost nearly every GOP voter who has a tough urban commute.

whopis01

(3,498 posts)
54. Speak for yourself
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 10:09 AM
Jan 2014

I would never praise any official for doing something like this. I don't care if they are republican, democratic, my best friend or my brother.

To take out government and degenerate it to this point where it is nothing more than a team sport filled with stupid frat-boy pranks is at best short sighted.

Who in their right mind would praise an abuse of power just because it is their candidate who is abusing it?

These people are supposed to be elected officials, not cult leaders.

 

Arugula Latte

(50,566 posts)
67. Yes -- this was terrible -- affecting thousands of thousands of lives for days and causing
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 01:20 PM
Jan 2014

untold stress, aggravation, economic damage, and delaying emergency response. This is not some petty, minor traffic snarl where it takes you ten minutes to get past roadwork or something.

Bandit

(21,475 posts)
24. Oh really! Who produced such a study anyway?
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 05:55 PM
Jan 2014

I know of no one that has seen such a "study"... Who has the "study" so we can conclude there was no malice involved.

 

Demo_Chris

(6,234 posts)
26. I am not disputing any of that...
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 06:17 PM
Jan 2014

Look, if you want to believe that this is some super serious SCANDAL knock yourself out. You can believe whatever you like, and eventually history will show that one of us is correct. I happen to believe that basically no one outside a handful of political junkies will ever give a damn, and that's even IF everything our party is alleging turns out to be correct. Christie can come out tomorrow and ANNOUNCE that he deliberately trashed traffic just to exact vengeance against a political foe and the American people would shrug and say "Well yeah, I'd do that to. I wish my representative wasn't such a pussy."

But that's just my opinion. You could be correct. Time will tell.

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
29. Maybe the missing four-year-old girls parents who couldn't get
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 06:38 PM
Jan 2014

enough police to them to search for the girl (who was eventually found) quickly enough. Or the EMTs or firefighter's that couldn't get through the traffic or the woman who couldn't get to the hospital while her husband had major surgery... or, or, or.

Think about it, for political retribution he played with people's lives. Same as Bush. It may not be as grand a scale but it's the same damn thing.

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
34. If you could show a direct correlation to loss of life or injury, you might have a point
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 08:05 PM
Jan 2014

Absent that, this strikes me as a non-event.

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
35. In another thread about this, they're talking about a 91 year old woman
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 08:31 PM
Jan 2014

who died on route to the hospital. The ambulance was delayed by 4 minutes. Did those lost 4 minutes lead to this woman's death? I don't know, only a doctor could tell you but that's pretty bothersome in and of itself.

rpannier

(24,329 posts)
48. The death of the 91 year old woman will be difficult to overcome
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 06:49 AM
Jan 2014

But, a few more severe weather problems where he looks good or something else that happens in the next 3 years that fall his way and he may be fine.
If this drags out the way Watergate did, with new revelations and him stonewalling... he's likely finished.
It's all going to depend on what happens next and after that...

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
50. People are going to look at that and say "Yeah, but she was 91"
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 09:36 AM
Jan 2014

No money changed hands in this escapade. No one stood to gain anything (except the intangible "sense of revenge&quot No one's re-election was prevented. No violence took place. Some traffic was snarled.

Worst case: some aides will take the fall. Christie will survive this just fine, and this will be forgotten in 6 months.

yellowcanine

(35,698 posts)
56. "this will be forgotten in 6 months." Wishful thinking. This will drag Christie down.
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 10:12 AM
Jan 2014

Oh yes, aides will leave, no doubt, but then there is the question of why Christie dragged his feet on investigating this.....it took the emails to break this open.

 

Demo_Chris

(6,234 posts)
60. You think the death of a 91 year old woman...
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 10:51 AM
Jan 2014

Which might or might not have even HAPPENED, let alone been connected to this if it did, will have a greater election impact that the potentially preventable death of a US Ambassador and staff a few weeks prior to the last election?

Note that I am not drawing a parallel between these two incidents other than the one I have specified, meaning: as media events. You really think that three years from now people in other states completely unaffected by any traffic snarls are still going to give a shit about an allegedly improper traffic study conducted four or five years previously? Seriously, how plausible does that sound to you? I think we'd get more mileage out of an image of Christie parking improperly in a Handicap space.


yellowcanine

(35,698 posts)
65. False comparison. This was (apparently) specifically ordered by an aide.
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 12:59 PM
Jan 2014

So the aide is a perp. The crime was abuse of power and possibly reckless endangerment. Snarled traffic can result in serious injury and death, even if it did not in this case. Note: the "improper traffic study" was a cover story. That is clear now even if it wasn't before. No traffic study has turned up, in any case, unless the Onion has put one together (not a bad idea). Last I looked the perps in Benghazi were jihadists. Not really comparable, even as a media event. Anyway, it won't be Democrats running the ads. It will be Republicans - the nastiest ads come out during the primaries and you can be sure this will get used extensively, with or without the 91 yr old woman. Besides, it isn't over yet. There is still the question of "What did he know and when did he know it?" Don't forget, that question regarding a "third rate burglary" (under remarkably similar circumstances) took down a President. There clearly was a cover-up here. Only question is if Christie was involved in it. Right now I would say maybe not, but at the least he certainly did not turn over many rocks to try to find out what happened. At least not that we know about.

 

Demo_Chris

(6,234 posts)
66. We will see. It is better that Christie lose now. We don't want to face him in '16...
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 01:15 PM
Jan 2014

We definitely do not want to run Clinton against Christie.

yellowcanine

(35,698 posts)
55. If there was no injury it was just dumb luck. "Reckless endangerment" comes to mind.
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 10:09 AM
Jan 2014

And that is not a stretch. More accidents, delayed emergency response, etc. A "traffic jam" is not a benign event. I am guessing the backups were measured in miles in this case - for 4 days. First day of school so there were school buses, as well as emergency vehicles delayed because of this. Police had to be taken off regular patrol to direct traffic, etc.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
30. Um...you are wrong. The worst emails haven't come out yet, nor the emails from the coverup....
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 06:42 PM
Jan 2014

specifically suggesting the use of the 20 miles-away traffic study as the reason for the bridge closures.

And Mr. Christie thought he had the Democrats cowed.....

BlueEye

(449 posts)
42. I agree the whole thing seems a bit petulant.
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 10:18 PM
Jan 2014

But this is politics in the 21st Century. Like it or not, the Rethugs have no shame in turning small-ish things into poltical weapons. The Democrats need to give them a taste of their own medicine and badger Christie with this until it's been beaten to death. If the NJ Legislature can squeeze some criminal charges, that's fantastic, as it will be fodder against Christie in 2016.

Cha

(297,029 posts)
36. And, it looks like your fucking governor/and/or his inside staff
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 08:32 PM
Jan 2014

deliberately caused more of it for Revenge on the Democratic Mayor, Mark Sokolich, of Fort Lee, NJ.

 

imthevicar

(811 posts)
79. This is Just a distraction.
Sun Jan 12, 2014, 06:48 PM
Jan 2014

The Senate Just Passed Fast track legislation for the T.P.P. Great POTUS we have...

bucolic_frolic

(43,115 posts)
37. Don't count your chickens ...
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 08:37 PM
Jan 2014

but do be encouraged, because the very least that cannot be dismissed

is that integrity is imparted from the top down, with penalties and consequences,

and that does not mean lax oversight

or "agents without portfolio"

or plausible deniability

or wink wink "see if you can get away with it"

or "don't tell me".

This is serious stuff with serious political consequences.

 

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)
40. Fuck them!! They need to stand by their criminal asshole governor! That's who they supported! Own it
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 09:05 PM
Jan 2014

I will never forgive these dumb-a$$$$$ Jersey Democrats for supporting this corrupt, fat idiot. Never! They deserve everything they get! NOW they wanna act big and bad and tough?? Forget that noise! They abandoned their own candidate for this jerk! They need to own up to it and stand by their crook!

bucolic_frolic

(43,115 posts)
41. Bridgegazi
Wed Jan 8, 2014, 09:51 PM
Jan 2014

This is as big a political gift as

Mark Foley Congressional Aid Scandal

Sarah Palin VP Candidate

Mitt Romney 47% Speech

U.S. Rep. Todd Akin "Legitimate Rape" comments

Indiana State Treasurer Richard Mourdock's rape comments

This is a gift, a scandal that promises to be lingering, with
dripping headlines for months that damage political integrity
and competence and show a mean-spirited and perhaps lying
side

A copper bottom scandal!

rpannier

(24,329 posts)
47. Disagree
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 06:45 AM
Jan 2014

Nixon proposed a base living wage for the poor
Nixon had a National Health Care plan
Nixon signed an executive order creating the EPA in 1970
Nixon signed the Clean Air Act
Nixon appointed the first Native American to the Bureau of Indian Affairs

Christie is not in Nixon's league. Christie is a zillion times worse because in all areas of his politics he sucks

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
51. A woman DIED because the ambulance coming to possibly save her
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 09:43 AM
Jan 2014

was held up in Governor bully boy's traffic jam!



Chris Christie bridge scandal: Traffic delay slowed response to patient

11:52 p.m. CST, January 8, 2014

In September, according to a report from the Bergen Record, paramedics trying to reach an unconscious 91-year-old woman in Fort Lee, N.J., got stuck in a traffic jam that had apparently been created by associates for New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie as retaliation against a Democratic mayor.


http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-chris-christie-bridge-scandal-20140108,0,4169085.story

There may be criminal charges?

 

vkkv

(3,384 posts)
71. Why would the HEAD OF THE PORT AUTHORITY even CONSIDER such a STUPID request by a ChristyCream aide?
Thu Jan 9, 2014, 03:38 PM
Jan 2014

Why would the HEAD OF THE PORT AUTHORITY even CONSIDER such a STUPID request by a ChristyCream aide?

Answer - He knew it came from ChristyCream himself.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yes! N.J. Senate Majorit...