Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

niyad

(113,205 posts)
Sun Jan 12, 2014, 12:55 AM Jan 2014

spill much larger than originally stated (7,500 gallons, not 5,000)

. . . .


The spill began on January 9, 2014 when up to 7,500 US gallons (28,000 litres; 6,200 imperial gallons) of crude MCHM leaked from a one-inch hole in the bottom of a stainless steel storage tank capable of holding 40,000 US gallons (150,000 litres; 33,000 imperial gallons) and its containment area at Freedom Industries' Charleston facility.[10][11][13] The MCHM leaked from the containment area and into the ground, through which it traveled into the Elk River.[14] The chemical spill occurred 1 mile (1.6 km) upstream from West Virginia American Water's drinking water intake and treatment and distribution center.[10][13][14][15] The Elk River measured approximately 7 feet (2.1 m) in depth at the time of the spill.[5]
The spill was noticed around mid morning on January 9 by several Charleston area residents when they began to notice a "sweet smell" in the air.[1][10][13][14] Two Freedom Industries employees noticed leakage from the tank into the containment area around 10:30 a.m. on January 9.[3][13] According to the company's president Gary Southern, workers began cleanup immediately by hauling away the remaining MCHM in the storage tank and vacuuming the spilled MCHM from the ground nearby.[3][11][13] The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, whose inspectors discovered the leak at 11:10 a.m. in response to residents' complaints about the odor[3], contradicted Southern's claim. When the department's inspectors arrived at the facility, they witnessed the MCHM leaking through a concrete block containment dike with no cleanup or containment measures underway.[3][16] The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection and the Kanawha County Fire Department had been able to locate the origin of the leak by tracing the smell.[13][14] At the time of the leak's discovery by the inspectors, the damaged storage tank contained about 30,000 US gallons (110,000 litres; 25,000 imperial gallons) of MCHM.[16]

West Virginia American Water did not detect the chemical in its water, but by 4 p.m., its carbon filtration system could no longer handle the large amount of contamination in the water and the chemical began flowing through the carbon filter.[5][12] West Virginia American Water concluded that its tap water was unsafe for use and instructed its customers to cease using its tap water at 5:45 p.m.[10][13] Freedom Industries failed to contact West Virginia American Water following the spill, and West Virginia American Water was instead notified by the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection.[5]

Freedom Industries denied initial media inquiries following the spill.[1] The company's president Gary Southern gave a ten minute news conference on the evening of January 10.[1]
Counties (pictured) in West Virginia affected by the 2014 Elk River chemical spill.
. . . .


By 1 p.m. on January 10, the foul sweet-smelling odor was no longer detectable, according to West Virginia National Guard Adjutant, Major General James Hoyer.[5]
On January 11, West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection's chief of homeland security and emergency response, Mike Dorsey, stated that
*******7,500 US gallons (28,000 litres; 6,200 imperial gallons) of MCHM had spilled into the river, 2,500 US gallons (9,500 litres; 2,100 imperial gallons) more than had previously been estimated*******
. . .

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Elk_River_chemical_spill

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
spill much larger than originally stated (7,500 gallons, not 5,000) (Original Post) niyad Jan 2014 OP
Gawd help us! sheshe2 Jan 2014 #1
hinkley comes to mind, except that this is not a public utility. niyad Jan 2014 #2
As in ...Erin Brockovich? sheshe2 Jan 2014 #4
yes, exactly. niyad Jan 2014 #10
K&R Cleita Jan 2014 #3
7500 gallons is a lot. blackspade Jan 2014 #5
wouldn't hold my breath on the awakening part. niyad Jan 2014 #11
Hopefully Rachel can devote a little time to this starting Monday rocktivity Jan 2014 #6
K&R n/t NealK Jan 2014 #7
Does this remind anyone about another environmental disaster? BobUp Jan 2014 #8
indeed niyad Jan 2014 #12
Why do they believe BobUp Jan 2014 #14
Good fugging grief malaise Jan 2014 #9
. . . niyad Jan 2014 #13

sheshe2

(83,708 posts)
1. Gawd help us!
Sun Jan 12, 2014, 01:08 AM
Jan 2014

United States President Barack Obama further declared the chemical spill a Federal state of emergency on January 9. Following the President's declaration, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) was directed to provide assistance on the ground and federal funding for the state's emergency management efforts.


FEMA and the West Virginia National Guard distributed bottled water to the nine affected counties.The West Virginia Bureau of Public Health and the West Virginia National Guard began working on a "long-term" plan to ensure the availability of water and food supplies for residents in the affected areas. The West Virginia National Guard also provided potable water in tankers. On January 10, FEMA had sent 75 trucks, each carrying about 4,900 US gallons (19,000 litres; 4,100 imperial gallons) of water.

By the morning of January 11, the United States Department of Homeland Security had sent 16 tractor trailers of bottled water to 16 distribution centers around the Charleston metropolitan area. At a news conference on January 11, FEMA officials announced that they had already brought approximately 370,000 US gallons (1,400,000 litres; 310,000 imperial gallons) of potable water into affected areas.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Elk_River_chemical_spill

Thoughts and prayers to WV.

This is what happens when we are soft on regulations. My bottom dollar says its neglect. I may be wrong yet...

sheshe2

(83,708 posts)
4. As in ...Erin Brockovich?
Sun Jan 12, 2014, 01:31 AM
Jan 2014

Yup they are privately owned and can do as they please. to the corporations of America, the GOP loves you. Doing what they do best! Contaminate at will. Profits before people.

Gotta say...they suck!

We have one fricking planet. I sure wish they would stop destroying it. Here is a fact, they live here too. Breath deeply my friends, have a sip of water. You have destroyed what is safe... for each and every one of us. You are not exempt to the effects.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
5. 7500 gallons is a lot.
Sun Jan 12, 2014, 02:24 AM
Jan 2014

How did the MCHM end up upstream from the main water intake anyway?
How was that approved?
One can hope that this will wake up the sheep.

BobUp

(347 posts)
14. Why do they believe
Sun Jan 12, 2014, 01:04 PM
Jan 2014

they need to lie about the magnitude of these disasters? Most times, they're larger than what they predict or state they are. And why are people believing what is being told now? If this turns out to be even larger than people are being told.

If I remember correctly, in the Exxon-Valdez incident, they'd understated the magnitude of that disaster several times, as well as the BP leak. If I go back even farther in time, I believe GE lied to the feds several times as to the scope of polluting the Hudson River. GE even tried to stall ongoing litigation to buy time.

http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/looks-gulf-spill-may-be-six-times-gre


http://www.clearwater.org/news/timeline.html

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»spill much larger than or...