General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRare color film shows what London looked like in 1927
In 1927 Claude Friese-Greene shot some of the first-ever color film footage around London. He captured everyday life in the city with a technique innovated by his father, called Biocolour.
Though we usually think of French names like Lumiere and Melies when we think of early film pioneers, Friese-Greenes technique captures London in striking detail, as if putting the whole city in a time capsule. The people, most now long since gone, pass before us like ghosts. Whats striking is, apart from the noticeably formal clothing and a few old cars, how familiar and unchanged everything seems. Trafalgar Square, which the films title card describes as another monument to a hero of the past, looks the same now, as does London Bridge and the London Tower.
Urban Peek notes British Film Institute used computer enhancement to reduce the flickering effect of the original Biocolour and bring us this striking rare film which transports us back through time. Watch below.
http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/198876/rare-color-film-shows-what-london-looked-like-in-1927/
surrealAmerican
(11,358 posts)... the comparison to Melies and the Lumieres is just silly. This film was shot a generation later, at a time when the motion picture industry was very well established.
I wonder what the process was. Did it perhaps use three negatives shot through different filters, and combined during projection?
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)patricia92243
(12,592 posts)dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)Last edited Tue Jan 14, 2014, 12:31 PM - Edit history (1)
but even I must confess I've never heard that expression before and I'm a Londoner.
I THINK that was this arch into Hyde Park which is the one from Piccadilly.
Learn something everyday.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,271 posts)in use in Australia in 1918: http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/119710899
hunter
(38,303 posts)The final result looks very much like the original two-color Technicolor process, which exposed two frames at once, thus requiring both a special camera and projector. This "Biocolour" process did not require a special projector, but the method of using alternate color frames created an irritating flicker.
It strikes me that innovation in color film processes were quite rapid, similar to that of personal computer graphics. I remember the first time I saw Amiga color graphics, and they were far better than anything IBM or Apple computers offered at the time.
I later bought an Amiga that had been used to produce local television commercials for next to nothing. Now that I think about it, that may have been one of the last computers I ever bought for myself. Since then all my computers have been scrap, too slow for the latest Microsoft cruft, restored to usefulness with Linux.
Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,494 posts).
snooper2
(30,151 posts)make your own lane!
MattSh
(3,714 posts)London 1927 and 2013 side by side.
http://vimeo.com/81368735
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)Quite tasteful. The comparison of a hand signal with a traffic light made me laugh.
I prefer this version of Canon in D.
Crack me up those Korean kids.