Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 02:23 PM Jan 2014

Supreme Court Hands Monsanto Victory Over Farmers On GMO Seed Patents, Ability To Sue

The US Supreme Court upheld biotech giant Monsanto’s claims on genetically-engineered seed patents and the company’s ability to sue farmers whose fields are inadvertently contaminated with Monsanto materials.

The high court left intact Monday a federal appeals court decision that threw out a 2011 lawsuit from the Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association and over 80 other plaintiffs against Monsanto that sought to challenge the agrochemical company’s aggressive claims on patents of genetically-modified seeds. The suit also aimed to curb Monsanto from suing anyone whose field is contaminated by such seeds.

The group of plaintiffs, which included many individual American and Canadian family farmers, independent seed companies and agricultural organizations, were seeking preemptive protections against Monsanto’s patents. The biotech leviathan has filed over 140 lawsuits against farmers for planting the company’s genetically-engineered seeds without permission, while settling around 700 other cases without suing.

None of the plaintiffs are customers of Monsanto and none have licensing agreements with the company. The group argued that they do not want Monsanto’s genetically-modified organisms (GMOs) and want legal protection in case of inadvertent contact with the company’s products.

The appeals court decision was based on Monsanto’s supposed promise not to sue farmers whose crops - including corn, soybeans, cotton, canola and others - contained traces of the company’s biotechnology products.

MORE...

http://rt.com/usa/monsanto-patents-sue-farmers-547/

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court Hands Monsanto Victory Over Farmers On GMO Seed Patents, Ability To Sue (Original Post) Purveyor Jan 2014 OP
SMH Mr Dixon Jan 2014 #1
This is bad. Le Taz Hot Jan 2014 #2
Been quite a successful day for corporations! djean111 Jan 2014 #3
So the court thinks the most important thing in the food chain is not the farmers but the chemical jwirr Jan 2014 #4
"Ha ha. Too bad about you human beings. Smirk. Sneer." - Mutant Scientific Materialists, Inc. (R) Berlum Jan 2014 #5
Shouldn't an organic farmer be able to sue Monsanto if his crops are contaminated by monsanto genes? hootinholler Jan 2014 #6
hahahaha. Monsanto has a history of suing organic farmers when their crops are contaminated cali Jan 2014 #9
I'm well aware of that history hootinholler Jan 2014 #13
That's not what this suit was about mathematic Jan 2014 #16
....mkay. nt laundry_queen Jan 2014 #22
Well, I guess we should just take Monsanto at their word TroglodyteScholar Jan 2014 #24
That's a terrible idea. mathematic Jan 2014 #25
we live in a corpocracy. and anyone who doesn't grasp that is a moron of epic proportions cali Jan 2014 #7
Oh great sakabatou Jan 2014 #8
When does that court start sewing all the corporate logos onto their robes? sinkingfeeling Jan 2014 #10
I don't want BarackTheVote Jan 2014 #11
we are fucked. Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2014 #12
More bad news. ananda Jan 2014 #14
this 'supreme' court has GOT to go. spanone Jan 2014 #15
SupremO Clarence Thomas (R) was previously on Monsanto's payroll Berlum Jan 2014 #17
Right out of Nightmare on Elm Street. Cha Jan 2014 #19
Damned Supreme's are worse than the crooks dickthegrouch Jan 2014 #18
Fuck monsanto's take over of America.. Europe doesn't Cha Jan 2014 #20
K&R! countryjake Jan 2014 #21
I sure hope this SC isn't the one that ends up reviewing net neutrality TroglodyteScholar Jan 2014 #23
Stupid or sly (R)? Berlum Jan 2014 #26
K&R woo me with science Jan 2014 #27
k & r wtf peoli Jan 2014 #28

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
2. This is bad.
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 02:25 PM
Jan 2014

This is VERY bad. The only way we're going to fight this is to ban GMO altogether. Unfortunately, this president seems to be in Monsanto's pocket so I'm thinking that's not going to happen real soon.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
4. So the court thinks the most important thing in the food chain is not the farmers but the chemical
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 03:01 PM
Jan 2014

companies and the corporations. We are surely going to starve to death now.

hootinholler

(26,449 posts)
6. Shouldn't an organic farmer be able to sue Monsanto if his crops are contaminated by monsanto genes?
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 03:08 PM
Jan 2014

I would think that to be spoilage by Monsanto's actions.

We need some legislation to establish the pecking order here.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
9. hahahaha. Monsanto has a history of suing organic farmers when their crops are contaminated
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 03:11 PM
Jan 2014

with their shit.

mathematic

(1,439 posts)
16. That's not what this suit was about
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 03:47 PM
Jan 2014

This was about farmers suing to prevent monsanto from suing them in the future. The subject here is pre-crime (or pre-civil-infraction). I'm not a lawyer or anything but the idea of suing to prevent somebody from suing you in the future seems strange at best.

Monsanto says they don't sue for unintentional infringement. The confusion comes from the (different) farmers that monsanto sued using "it was unintentional" as a defense for intentional patent infringement. If a large part of your crop uses monsanto seed, it's clear that the infringement wasn't unintentional. Indeed, the plaintiffs lawyer is this case maintains that this decision means monsanto cannot bring a suit for infringement if less than 1% of the crop is from monsanto seeds (a quote in the original reuters but left out of the RT rewrite). That actually seems like it's a best case scenario here. The organic farmers don't have to worry about suits for unintentional infringement and monsanto still has the rights to sue for intentional infringement.

mathematic

(1,439 posts)
25. That's a terrible idea.
Wed Jan 15, 2014, 03:44 AM
Jan 2014

I think they should have to prove infringement in a court of law. After all, that's what courts are for.

spanone

(135,828 posts)
15. this 'supreme' court has GOT to go.
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 03:38 PM
Jan 2014

wanna bet they strike down Obama's recess appointments????

who the fuck knows.....

dickthegrouch

(3,172 posts)
18. Damned Supreme's are worse than the crooks
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 04:14 PM
Jan 2014

How can they possibly justify this kind of result?

What kind of corruption leads to this? How do we root it out?

Cha

(297,160 posts)
20. Fuck monsanto's take over of America.. Europe doesn't
Tue Jan 14, 2014, 08:20 PM
Jan 2014

want them.. Mexico kicked them out.. but, the fucking fascist plutocrats in AMerica insist they assist in killing off our Aina.

Hawai'i gets this.. Yay!



Our Island of Kaua'i gets this..

Kauai approves 'Right to Know' Bill 2491

The bill requires farms to disclose pesticides use and the presence of genetically modified crops if they use more than five pounds or 15 gallons of restricted use pesticides annually.

The bill also requires buffer zones near schools, homes medical facilities, public roads, and waterways. It takes effect in nine months.

And, now GMO Companies are taking it to court.. a$$holes don't want anyone to know what poisonous shit they're spraying.. nor do they want "buffer zones" it would seem.

Kaua'i's Right to Know


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court Hands Monsa...