Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hootinholler

(26,449 posts)
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 12:39 PM Jan 2014

The new talking point about the NSA and Snowden made its appearance today on Press the Meat

It's gonna cost us billions for fix what Snowden did. Heard that from more than one guest. That one is new and it was mixed in with the more familiar claims like it's just phone numbers, etc.

Do they not realize it wasn't Snowden who's actions need fixing? The NSA's actions need fixing, that is not Snowden's fault. I think that if they didn't need fixing we wouldn't even know Snowden's name.

25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The new talking point about the NSA and Snowden made its appearance today on Press the Meat (Original Post) hootinholler Jan 2014 OP
"Billions" of TAXPAYER money to "fix it up" for our global corporate economic imperialists riderinthestorm Jan 2014 #1
The thing that gets me is hootinholler Jan 2014 #3
It's going to cost us billions to fix what Ted Cruz did. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2014 #2
I missed this. What did Cruz do wrt to NSA? 2banon Jan 2014 #10
I wasn't referring specifically to Cruz and NSA, just Cruz on his own. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2014 #13
Ted Cruz and the Rethugs government shut-down stunt is estimated to have cost $24billion riderinthestorm Jan 2014 #14
Ah.. Yes THAT... notice how it's all but a dim memory in the minds of the Public thanks to the M$M? 2banon Jan 2014 #17
To be fair, Snowden supporters often make money a salient point. randome Jan 2014 #4
What do you expect from corporate autobots? Rex Jan 2014 #5
I love the contradiction: rgbecker Jan 2014 #6
Snowden wasn't able to steal any personal data. Only internal NSA documents. randome Jan 2014 #9
I guess you know for sure he didn't get any personal info because....? rgbecker Jan 2014 #12
I don't 'know' anything. Except that Snowden has not proved his claims. randome Jan 2014 #15
So basically you're saying Snowden didn't leak anything we didn't know and hasn't given us rgbecker Jan 2014 #18
From our standpoint, no, Snowden told us nothing substantially new. randome Jan 2014 #19
That we had heard rumors about since 2007ish hootinholler Jan 2014 #21
Just like climate change. Problems that cost the wrong people money can't exist! n/t DirkGently Jan 2014 #7
It was just phone numbers, nt Progressive dog Jan 2014 #8
Anyone on the Panel talk about the cost for the facility in Utah? 2banon Jan 2014 #11
For the first time on NPR this morning a reporter referenced the "Libertarian Left" : ACLU 2banon Jan 2014 #16
Calling us Reds and Commies is sooooo 1950's. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2014 #22
Wrong verb. We can fix that. 'It's going to cost us billions to fix what Snowden EXPOSED'. sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #20
What happens if we don't "fix it"? Do we become like the rest of the world? Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2014 #23
I guess destroying evidence is expensive. nt woo me with science Jan 2014 #24
What was Ollie North's secretary's name? hootinholler Jan 2014 #25
 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
1. "Billions" of TAXPAYER money to "fix it up" for our global corporate economic imperialists
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 12:44 PM
Jan 2014

so they can continue their race to the top .5%... or something.

What a crock.

What needs to happen is that its DEFUNDED by several billions - now THAT would be a fix.

hootinholler

(26,449 posts)
3. The thing that gets me is
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 12:46 PM
Jan 2014

How they imply that if Snowden hadn't done anything things would be just peachy.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
2. It's going to cost us billions to fix what Ted Cruz did.
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 12:46 PM
Jan 2014

And he wasn't doing a great service for the citizens of the world like Ed Snowden was.

 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
14. Ted Cruz and the Rethugs government shut-down stunt is estimated to have cost $24billion
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 01:32 PM
Jan 2014

But of course there's no peep about that REAL money down the drain...

Now we have some mythical "billions of dollars" price tag affixed to Snowden's actions (where's the proof anyway).

Its just the latest stupid talking point that's all. The Cruz analogy was simply to point out the hypocrisy I believe.


 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
17. Ah.. Yes THAT... notice how it's all but a dim memory in the minds of the Public thanks to the M$M?
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 01:37 PM
Jan 2014
 

randome

(34,845 posts)
4. To be fair, Snowden supporters often make money a salient point.
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 01:03 PM
Jan 2014

Neither 'side' should bring that type of argument onto the field unless and until there is nothing more to debate.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]“If you're not committed to anything, you're just taking up space.”
Gregory Peck, Mirage (1965)
[/center][/font][hr]

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
5. What do you expect from corporate autobots?
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 01:05 PM
Jan 2014

It cost us 24 billion dollars when the idiot party shutdown the government...don't hear people complaining about THAT too much. The NSA is perfect to some people and can do no wrong. Many of them are called employees.

rgbecker

(4,820 posts)
6. I love the contradiction:
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 01:11 PM
Jan 2014

1. You have nothing to worry about. The data is the professional's hands...only 22 professionals can get to it.

2. OMG! Snowden, Satan himself, on the government contractor's payroll, has taken all our information and given it to KBG agents in Russia costing the tax payers billions of dollars. We don't know what information he has given out. The guy should be killed on the spot to save the nation.

3. You shouldn't worry, all the data is safe and sound. Only professional's have access.



WTF?



 

randome

(34,845 posts)
9. Snowden wasn't able to steal any personal data. Only internal NSA documents.
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 01:22 PM
Jan 2014

As much as he claimed to have "seen things", you'd think he'd have done something to prove that.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]“If you're not committed to anything, you're just taking up space.”
Gregory Peck, Mirage (1965)
[/center][/font][hr]

rgbecker

(4,820 posts)
12. I guess you know for sure he didn't get any personal info because....?
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 01:30 PM
Jan 2014

The NSA told you? I'd like to see that link.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
15. I don't 'know' anything. Except that Snowden has not proved his claims.
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 01:33 PM
Jan 2014

Remember, he and Greenwald led off with the metadata, a legal warrant relating to a practice we've known about since 2007.

Followed by a Powerpoint slide that showed the opposite of what he claimed.

Tepid stuff, other than revealing details of how the NSA spies on other countries. Something we also have known about since forever.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]“If you're not committed to anything, you're just taking up space.”
Gregory Peck, Mirage (1965)
[/center][/font][hr]

rgbecker

(4,820 posts)
18. So basically you're saying Snowden didn't leak anything we didn't know and hasn't given us
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 01:37 PM
Jan 2014

proof that what he says is true? And so that's why the NSA and the entire federal government is after him?

Am I missing something in what you are claiming?

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
19. From our standpoint, no, Snowden told us nothing substantially new.
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 01:47 PM
Jan 2014

But from the standpoint of international relations, he revealed how the NSA goes about its spying mandate, likely putting agents' lives at risk and roiling international relations.

What was the point of that? He thinks he's smart enough to decide diplomacy on our behalf?

It works both ways, you know. If Snowden was only trying to 'save us', what is the point of handing over tens of thousands of documents to multiple news organizations? It's not like he read them all or has any idea of the repercussions they might contain.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]“If you're not committed to anything, you're just taking up space.”
Gregory Peck, Mirage (1965)
[/center][/font][hr]

hootinholler

(26,449 posts)
21. That we had heard rumors about since 2007ish
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 06:13 PM
Jan 2014

There were lawsuits that were rejected due to lack of standing that were reopened after the metadata revelations. If all that was happening under a 'legal warrant' there would still be no standing for those suits.

That doesn't even get to the latest program to be exposed DishFire or something like that where all txt traffic is collected.

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
11. Anyone on the Panel talk about the cost for the facility in Utah?
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 01:28 PM
Jan 2014

I love the "Press the Meat" moniker, btw.

 

2banon

(7,321 posts)
16. For the first time on NPR this morning a reporter referenced the "Libertarian Left" : ACLU
Sun Jan 19, 2014, 01:33 PM
Jan 2014

actually using the term "libertarian left". almost coughed up my coffee when I heard it.

Up until now, we've largely been ignored or referred to in quite pejorative terms, i.e. "The Far Left".

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
23. What happens if we don't "fix it"? Do we become like the rest of the world?
Mon Jan 20, 2014, 02:51 AM
Jan 2014

Just another 2nd rate power that doesn't spend a massive chunk of its wealth on the military?


EEEEK!!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The new talking point abo...