Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,063 posts)
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 01:48 PM Jan 2014

Dana Milbank: Did GOP read bill?

Read the bill! This was a rallying cry of the tea party in 2010 and of Republicans bitter about a 906-page healthcare law that few proponents had read.

Republicans made a “read the bill” pledge and vowed that they would put the text of bills online at least 72 hours before votes. But a very different Republican Party rushed a massive spending bill through the House last week — just 44 hours after it was posted.

The bill was 1,582 pages and accompanying explanatory statements added another 1,278, which means lawmakers had less than a minute to read each page, even if they didn’t sleep.

This was an ugly and gargantuan $1.1 trillion spending bill, cutting vital programs while sending goodies to well-connected industries. And yet there was some good news in the swift and easy passage through the House, followed quickly by the Senate and signed Friday by President Barack Obama: It means business-as-usual is returning to the Capitol.

More at http://www.themonitor.com/opinion/columnists/article_725fa61e-82f2-11e3-b3a9-001a4bcf6878.html .

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dana Milbank: Did GOP read bill? (Original Post) TexasTowelie Jan 2014 OP
typical republican hypocrisy leftyohiolib Jan 2014 #1
A few of the sordid details pscot Jan 2014 #2
They have worked so little, they may have forgotten how to read... Frustratedlady Jan 2014 #3
While it cuts social safety net programs and climate change efforts. If this bunch of hippocrits jwirr Jan 2014 #4

pscot

(21,024 posts)
2. A few of the sordid details
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 01:55 PM
Jan 2014

The bill gives at least $62 million, and possibly as much as $119 million, to the United States Enrichment Corp., a government spinoff that last month announced plans to file for bankruptcy.

— The bill blocks the Navy from retiring seven cruisers and two amphibious ships. It gave the Pentagon $950 million more than it wanted for one class of attack submarines. But the measure denied the Pentagon $8 million it sought to study more base closures.

— The bill awards the Pentagon $666 million to study illnesses and afflictions ranging from Lou Gehrig’s disease to breast cancer — activities not closely related to war-fighting.

— The bill gives the oil and nuclear industries a bonanza: $154 million more than the Department of Energy requested for nuclear energy and $141 million more than requested for fossil-fuel development, despite enormous oil profits.

— The bill provides more than $44 million for the Army Corps of Engineers that the administration had not requested. Lawmakers have been issuing press releases bragging about pet projects that are earmarks in everything but name.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
4. While it cuts social safety net programs and climate change efforts. If this bunch of hippocrits
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 02:29 PM
Jan 2014

live to see the results of this kind of governing I hope they are in the worst of it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dana Milbank: Did GOP rea...