General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRequest to all "pro-Israel" Democrats...please repudiate AIPAC once and for all now.
The attack on Debbie Wasserman Schultz, one of the most "pro-Israel" Democrats in Congress, is the step too far. Rep. Wasserman-Schultz had done everything AIPAC ever asked of her, and they STILL went after her.
With that attack, AIPAC has branded itself, once and for all, as an organ of the right wing of the Republican Party.
This, coupled with AIPAC's support of the most hawkish and dangerous anti-peace factions in Israeli politics, makes AIPAC effectively an enemy of both Democrats AND Israel itself.
Time to break with AIPAC once and for all...before it damages the party you support and does irreparable damage to the cause of the country you are trying to support.
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)Haven't heard of this.
lostincalifornia
(3,639 posts)joshcryer
(62,269 posts)Responding personally so you get the notification. Appreciate it, I just signed on and didn't see it.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)joshcryer
(62,269 posts)kristopher
(29,798 posts)BY JOHN HUDSON JANUARY 23, 2014 - 07:52 PM
A recent letter attacking Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz is causing an internal brouhaha at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, The Cable has learned. The powerful lobbying outfit, known for its disciplined non-partisan advocacy for Israel, recently issued an action alert about the Florida congresswoman's waffling on Iran sanctions legislation. The letter urged members to contact Wasserman Schultz and cited a disparaging article about her in a conservative website founded by a prominent Republican political operative.
That AIPAC was driving hard for new Iran sanctions legislation surprised no one. But its use of a right-wing blog to target a well-connected Jewish Democrat with a long history of support for Israel raised eyebrows among some current and former AIPAC officials. It also raised concerns that AIPAC's open revolt against the White House's Iran diplomacy could fray its relations with liberal Democrats on the Hill.
"In the 40 years I've been involved with AIPAC, this is the first time I've seen such a blatant departure from bipartisanship," said Doug Bloomfield, AIPAC's former chief lobbyist. Bloomfield was referring to an AIPAC letter scrutinizing Wasserman Schultz's silence on sanctions. The letter relied on the Washington Free Beacon's reporting, which (irony alert) happened to be the first news outlet to report on the existence of the letter.
"We are asking you, our leaders in the pro-Israel community, to reach out to Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz's office," read the letter. "The [Free Beacon] article included below about Debbie Wasserman Schultz blocking bipartisan Iran sanctions came out yesterday and, simply put, we need to know if the story is true."
Bruce Levy, a member of AIPAC's National Council who supports new sanctions legislation, said the group made a mistake by using the partisan news site in its official alert to members. "It probably...
http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2014/01/23/one_of_congress_s_most_pro_israel_lawmakers_isn_t_pro_israel_enough_for_aipac
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)ReRe
(10,597 posts)... agree. And I'm no Debbie Wasserman-Schultz fan.
notemason
(299 posts)Rep. Wasserman-Schultz had done everything AIPAC ever asked of her,
Why?
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)At least she's finally beginning to see the light.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)I think you may have identified the problem right there.
- Just a thought.....
K&R
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)BTW...interesting smilie you posted there. What would I type in to put it in my posts?