Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,964 posts)
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 04:53 PM Jan 2014

'Bridgegate' The monitor closest to the bridge shut down at the height of the traffic jams

Talk about disappearing into thin air.

One night before local access lanes to New Jersey's George Washington Bridge were closed last fall in an apparent act of political retribution that sparked miles-long traffic jams for four straight days, an air quality monitor run by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection in Trenton abruptly ceased collecting data.

The closest state-run monitor to the bridge with its data posted online, the monitor started measuring air pollution again more than two days later – just as a key pollution indicator was starting to decline.

"They're missing data for 2 1/2 days – that's weird," says Ann Marie Carlton, an assistant professor at Rutgers University who studies air quality.

"I was really, really shocked when I saw there was no data. You might see a monitor go offline for a day because they're cleaning it or doing maintenance or calibration, but for it go down for this many days is intriguing."

http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2014/01/22/air-monitors-see-spike-in-pollution-during-bridgegate
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Bridgegate' The monitor closest to the bridge shut down at the height of the traffic jams (Original Post) kpete Jan 2014 OP
Such a coincidence!! MH1 Jan 2014 #1
They were being soooo sneaky .. I bet they Cha Jan 2014 #2
A New Jersey government department monitors the air... truebluegreen Jan 2014 #3
Oh, what bad luck! rocktivity Jan 2014 #4

Cha

(296,868 posts)
2. They were being soooo sneaky .. I bet they
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 05:19 PM
Jan 2014

crapped their collective pants when they had to turn over the incriminating emails.

Thanks to all the intrepid reporters, Rachel, et al who worked on this so diligently without let up.

rocktivity

(44,572 posts)
4. Oh, what bad luck!
Fri Jan 24, 2014, 05:51 PM
Jan 2014

Last edited Fri Jan 24, 2014, 08:34 PM - Edit history (1)



If that monitor had been working the pollution readings would have gone up high enough to trigger a response that could have culminated in Christie being notified and the lanes being re-opened. Unless...

Unless the shutdown of the air quality monitor was deliberately engineered by those evil, secretive minions of his, and precisely because they KNEW that a high reading would probably result in the lane closures being interrupted. Is there no end to their underhanded chicanery, and their ruthless soiling of poor, innocent Christie's spotless virtue?

Now, cue the DU "Cry Me A River" String Quartet!


rocktivity
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'Bridgegate' The monitor ...