Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

LuvNewcastle

(16,844 posts)
3. I didn't know that.
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 07:54 AM
Jan 2014

I've always thought posthumous awards were kind of sad, anyway, since the recipient will never know he/she won. Give the award to someone who can enjoy the recognition. My granddad used to say, "Don't send flowers to my funeral. Give me my flowers while I'm living."

66 dmhlt

(1,941 posts)
5. They have always prohibited posthumous NOMINATIONS & further tightened rules in 1974 ...
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 09:56 AM
Jan 2014

So that no posthumous awards were allowed unless a laureate dies AFTER the winner's announcement but BEFORE the award ceremony.

There have been four posthumous awards:
Erik Axel Karlfeldt (Literature); Dag Hammarskjöld (Peace); William Vickrey (Economics) and Ralph Steinman (Medicine)

Vickrey and Steinman were both still awarded the Prize because they died after the announcement. Steinman was actually probably dead BEFORE the announcement, but the Committee was not aware of that, and so they proceeded to give him the award.

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/44755546/ns/health-health_care/t/dead-nobel-medicine-winner-keep-prize/#.UuezQLDnZEY

caraher

(6,278 posts)
6. It's pretty clear he can't be nominated any longer
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 10:04 AM
Jan 2014

so he can't win.

Yes, there have been some flukes of timing, but the intention has always been for the award to go to a living honoree.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pete Seeger deserves a No...